119 results for 'court:"Federal Circuit"'.
J. Hughes finds that the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims properly denied the veteran’s claim for service connection for several conditions, including PTSD and a psychiatric disorder. There was insufficient evidence to confirm a link between his conditions and his service. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Hughes, Filed On: August 3, 2023, Case #: 2022-1089, Categories: Government, Veterans
J. Lourie finds that the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims properly denied the veteran's application for attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act. There was no evidence the government acted inappropriately to support the award of costs. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Lourie, Filed On: August 3, 2023, Case #: 2022-1531, Categories: Government, Veterans, Attorney Fees
J. Dyk finds that customs and border patrol improperly ruled that an importer had transshipped pencils to avoid antidumping duties because declining to allow the importer to rebut evidence denied due process.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Dyk, Filed On: July 27, 2023, Case #: 22-1226, Categories: Trade, Due Process
J. Lourie finds that the district court properly ruled in claims concerning a patent for an "inhaled solution formulation of treprostinil approved for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension" because the court properly determined valid claims were being infringed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Lourie, Filed On: July 24, 2023, Case #: 2022-2217, Categories: Patent
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Stark finds that the veterans court properly denied benefits based on evidence of the veteran's "willful and persistent misconduct." Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Stark, Filed On: July 14, 2023, Case #: 22-1607, Categories: Veterans
J. Chen finds that the patent board improperly ruled in claims concerning a method for killing bacteria with "clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats gene editing" because the application was not subjected to interference in light of the filing date of the company's patent. Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Chen, Filed On: July 14, 2023, Case #: 22-1260, Categories: Civil Procedure, Patent
J. Cunningham finds that the district court properly dismissed claims concerning a patent for a poll based networking system because the asserted claim is patent ineligible. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Cunningham, Filed On: July 14, 2023, Case #: 2022-1308, Categories: Patent
J. Linn finds that a company was properly denied a request to reissue a patent for a floating grill design because the reissue claim did not cover "the invention disclosed in the original patent." Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Linn, Filed On: July 12, 2023, Case #: 22-1438, Categories: Patent
J. Taranto finds that the patent trial and appeal board improperly ruled in claims concerning a method for implanting and anchoring neurostimulation leads since the board improperly analyzed obviousness. Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Taranto, Filed On: July 10, 2023, Case #: 2022-1451, Categories: Patent
J. Moore finds that the arbitrator improperly upheld a correction officer's dismissal based on her personal relationship with a former inmate because the arbitrator failed to analyze relevant facts and relied on the warden's analysis. Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Moore, Filed On: July 6, 2023, Case #: 22-1575, Categories: Employment
J. Reyna finds that the district court improperly ruled in this patent infringement dispute over a "photo-damage method for sorting particles" because the court misinterpreted the scope of a prior judgment and improperly determined that the current claim was precluded by res judicata. Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Reyna, Filed On: July 5, 2023, Case #: 22-1385, Categories: Civil Procedure, Patent
J. Stoll finds that the board of veterans' appeals improperly ruled regarding a disability rating by misinterpreting the requirements of the regulation. Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Stoll, Filed On: June 29, 2023, Case #: 2022-1243, Categories: Veterans
J. Dyk finds that the district court improperly ruled for the government in fifth amendment claims contending vehicles taken during a criminal investigation had not been returned to defendant because issues remain in dispute as to whether defendant abandoned the vehicles. Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Dyk, Filed On: June 28, 2023, Case #: 22-1378, Categories: Property, Due Process
J. Reyna finds that the patent trial and appeal board properly ruled in this dispute over "use of animal-protein-free botulinum toxin composition that exhibits a longer lasting effect in the patient" because the claim construction was reasonable and supported by evidence. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Reyna, Filed On: June 27, 2023, Case #: 22-1165, Categories: Patent
J. Dyk finds that the trademark trial and appeal board improperly ruled in this trademark dispute because evidence indicated the "FL FLEX" mark would cause customer confusion concerning the "FLEX" mark.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Dyk, Filed On: June 26, 2023, Case #: 2022-1578, Categories: Trademark
J. Moore finds that the court of federal claims improperly ruled in takings claims brought by farmers stemming from recurrent flooding because the farmers were improperly denied damages for lost crops. Reversed in part.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: June 16, 2023, Case #: 21-1849, Categories: Property, Damages
J. Taranto finds that the veteran's court improperly declined to change the disability effective date because the veteran would have applied for disability sooner but for threats of court-martial should he reveal information regarding secret testing performed on him with chemical warfare agents. Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Taranto, Filed On: June 15, 2023, Case #: 2019-2211, Categories: Veterans, Military
J. Lourie finds that the patent board properly rejected an application for methods of "increasing prostacyclin release in the systemic blood vessels of a human with essential hypertension to improve vasodilation" on the grounds of obviousness in view of the asserted prior art. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Lourie, Filed On: June 14, 2023, Case #: 2022-1489, Categories: Patent
J. Lourie finds that the Patent Board ruled properly in this patent dispute over technological patents for a voice system that allows users to request information using a web browser. The patents are unpatentable as obvious. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Lourie, Filed On: June 12, 2023, Case #: 2022-1269, Categories: Patent, Technology
J. Prost finds that the district court properly ruled in this patent dispute over an expandable hose design because the competing company properly pleaded to correct the patents and add co-inventors. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Prost, Filed On: June 9, 2023, Case #: 2021-2316, Categories: Patent
J. Taranto finds that the board of contract appeals improperly ruled for the construction company in a dispute over a contract to perform work in Yellowstone National Park because the board did not rely on facts in the record. Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Taranto, Filed On: June 6, 2023, Case #: 2021-1837, Categories: Construction, Contract
J. Taranto finds that the patent trial and appeal board improperly ruled in a dispute over "vehicle floor trays" because plaintiff sufficiently pleaded obviousness. Reversed in part.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Taranto, Filed On: June 6, 2023, Case #: 22-1373, Categories: Patent
J. Moore finds that the patent trial and appeal board properly ruled in this dispute over a heart catheter guide because the competitor failed to demonstrate catheter guides are unpatentable. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Moore, Filed On: June 5, 2023, Case #: 2021-2359, Categories: Patent
J. Lourie finds that the patent trial and appeal board properly held that a guide extension catheter was not unpatentable on grounds that the Itou patent does not constitute prior art because the product at issue was reduced to practice "prior to the critical date." Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Lourie, Filed On: May 24, 2023, Case #: 2021-2356, Categories: Patent
J. Dyk finds that the court of international trade properly deemed a solar appliance company ineligible for a separate rate in an antidumping administrative review because the company failed to establish subject merchandise had not been entered during the period of review. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Dyk, Filed On: May 19, 2023, Case #: 20-2162, Categories: Commerce, Trade