119 results for 'court:"Federal Circuit"'.
J. Stark finds that the court of international trade improperly overturned the president's modification of a proclamation related to imported solar panels because the modification did not violate regulations contained in the trade act. Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Stark, Filed On: November 13, 2023, Case #: 22-1392, Categories: Trade
J. Moore dismisses an appeal from the finding that a biotherapeutics company failed to prove that claims for "compositions and methods for treating pterygium" were unpatentable because the company failed to establish injury.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Moore, Filed On: November 7, 2023, Case #: 2022-1706, Categories: Patent
J. Hughes finds that the veterans' court properly denied an extra-schedular rating for plaintiff's lumbar spine injury since the director properly considered recommendations from agency officials. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Hughes, Filed On: November 7, 2023, Case #: 2022-1670, Categories: Veterans
J. Stoll finds that the district court improperly ruled in this patent dispute concerning the drug epoprostenol because the court adopted the wrong claim construction as to the meaning of "a pH of 13 or higher." Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Stoll, Filed On: November 6, 2023, Case #: 2022-1889, Categories: Patent
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Prost finds that the trial court improperly construed the definition of "pipette guiding mechanism" in claims concerning a patent for "machines that measure the amount of energy absorbed or released during a chemical reaction between two compounds."
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Prost, Filed On: November 1, 2023, Case #: 2022-1439, Categories: Patent
J. Chen finds that the patent trial and appeal board properly ruled in claims concerning the patent for a "method for adaptive bitrate streaming of content on a playback device" because arguments Netflix raised on appeal had not been raised in the original proceedings.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Chen, Filed On: October 25, 2023, Case #: 2022-1203, Categories: Patent
J. Stark finds that the trademark trial and appeal board improperly canceled a registered trademark held by a steak and seafood restaurant because the board lacked authority to cancel a fraudulently obtained mark. Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Stark, Filed On: October 18, 2023, Case #: 2022-1212, Categories: Fraud, Trademark
[Consolidated.] J. Stark finds that the trial court improperly ruled in patent claims concerning dual-aperture camera systems because issues of overall obviousness remain in dispute.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Stark, Filed On: October 16, 2023, Case #: 2022-1340, Categories: Patent
J. Stoll finds that the district court should have granted a company's motion to exclude an expert witness in patent claims concerning a method for manufacturing molded chokes. Reversed in part.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Stoll, Filed On: October 16, 2023, Case #: 2022-1873, Categories: Patent, Experts
J. Cunningham finds that the trial court improperly ruled in claims concerning a patent for methods of protecting network connectable devices because the decision was improperly based on a collateral estoppel decision that has since been vacated. Reversed in part.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Cunningham, Filed On: October 13, 2023, Case #: 22-1048, Categories: Civil Procedure, Patent
J. Clevenger finds that the patent trial and appeal board properly ruled in claims concerning a method for transferring images onto dark-colored fabric on grounds that the claims were unpatentable as obvious. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Clevenger, Filed On: October 6, 2023, Case #: 2022-1333, Categories: Patent
J. Chen finds that the patent trial and appeal board improperly ruled in this dispute over a patent for "methods of channel coding when transmitting data in radio systems" without including in the written determination whether the claim was indefinite or whether such rendered the claim "impossible."
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Chen, Filed On: October 6, 2023, Case #: 2022-1493, Categories: Patent
J. Reyna finds that the patent trial and appeal board properly ruled in this dispute over a "method and apparatus for treatment by ionizing radiation" because evidence supported findings regarding the motivation to combine and the reasonable expectation of success. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Reyna, Filed On: September 21, 2023, Case #: 2021-1985, Categories: Patent
J. Moore finds that the district court properly ruled in patent claims concerning a method for treating blood clots because the patent does not "teach skilled artisans how to make and use the full scope of claimed antibodies without unreasonable experimentation."
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Moore, Filed On: September 20, 2023, Case #: 2022-1461, Categories: Patent
J. Prost finds that the district court improperly ruled in patent claims concerning the design of heat reflective material because genuine issues remain in dispute as to whether summary judgment was appropriate. Revered.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Prost, Filed On: September 15, 2023, Case #: 2021-2299, Categories: Patent, Trademark
J. Stoll finds that the patent trial and appeal board improperly ruled against Apple in claims concerning a digital camera zoom feature because the board departed from the law by adopting a construction not raised by any party to the action. Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Stoll, Filed On: September 11, 2023, Case #: 2022-1350, Categories: Patent
J. Stoll finds that the patent trial and appeal board improperly ruled in claims concerning an invention related to the encoding, transmission, and decoding of multimedia files, as the board improperly determined Netflix failed to identify the field of endeavor for the patent and the prior art. Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Stoll, Filed On: September 11, 2023, Case #: 22-1138, Categories: Patent
J. Reyna finds that the trade commission properly ruled in an antidumping duty investigation concerning a steel company because the determination was supported by reasonable and substantial evidence. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Reyna, Filed On: September 7, 2023, Case #: 2022-1176, Categories: Trade
J. Stark finds the board properly denied the company’s motion to amend, concluding that the substitute claim is broader than original claim impermissibly. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Stark, Filed On: September 1, 2023, Case #: 2022-1387, Categories: Patent
[Consolidated.] J. Loruie finds that the patent trial and appeal board properly ruled in this dispute over unpatentable image sensors and cell phone devices because substantial evidence supports the ruling. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Loruie, Filed On: August 28, 2023, Case #: 22-1293, Categories: Patent, Technology
J. Lourie find that the patent and trademark office improperly ruled in this dispute because the office improperly determined that a steerable tractor-type drive design for boats is unpatentable as obvious. Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Lourie, Filed On: August 24, 2023, Case #: 2022-1765, Categories: Patent
J. Prost finds that the board of contract appeals improperly dismissed this contract dispute over government delays in connection with construction of a military compound in Afghanistan. Because the "sum-certain requirement is nonjurisdictional" for claims submitted under the Contract Disputes Act, the case is remanded to determine if the government has forfeited its right to challenge the satisfaction of the requirement. Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Prost, Filed On: August 22, 2023, Case #: 21-2323, Categories: Administrative Law, Government, Contract
J. Schall finds that methods for treating prostate cancer using radiation were properly found to be unpatentable as anticipated by the asserted prior art. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Schall, Filed On: August 16, 2023, Case #: 21-2063, Categories: Patent
J. Reyna finds that the patent trial and appeal board properly ruled in this dispute over methods for testing assay devices and biological fluids because substantial evidence supports the ruling. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Reyna, Filed On: August 11, 2023, Case #: 21-1796, Categories: Patent
[Consolidated.] J. Dyk finds that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ruled improperly in this patent dispute. The board erred in refusing new arguments and evidence as to the patents for transcutaneous charging of implanted medical devices. Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Dyk, Filed On: August 7, 2023, Case #: 2022-1532, Categories: Patent