2,816 results for 'cat:"Civil Rights"'.
J. Dishman dismisses the individual plaintiff's negligence and malicious prosecution claims against the government based on a lack of jurisdiction. The claims arise from an incident at a medical center that allegedly resulted in the plaintiff's arrest. He was later "acquitted of the conduct" and brought the current claims as a result. The conduct alleged against the law enforcement officers does not support a negligent arrest claim, however, and the plaintiff fails to cite "an appropriate private party analogue for his negligent delay of medical care claim." His excessive force claim remains for trial.
Court: USDC Western District of Oklahoma , Judge: Dishman, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 5:19cv1102, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Procedure, civil Rights, Negligence
J. Parker grants the school system's summary judgment motion in this lawsuit brought by a teacher asserting claims under Title VII and the Tennessee Human Rights Act for discrimination, sexual harassment and retaliation. Certain discrete claims of harassment are time-barred, and her hostile work environment claim is not supported by the allegations.
Court: USDC Western District of Tennessee , Judge: Parker, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv2346, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, Education, Employment Discrimination
J. Auld partially strikes certain witnesses and evidence from being brought by the NAACP against North Carolina and its Board of Elections, whose photo ID requirements for voters are allegedly racially discriminatory. The court says the NAACP failed to properly identify certain witnesses, such as some people who are said to have assisted voters with provisional votes due to the photo ID laws, so those witnesses may not be brought to testify at trial, nor may some of the documents relating to the implementation of those laws.
Court: USDC Middle District of North Carolina, Judge: Auld, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 1:18cv1034, NOS: Voting - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, Elections, Evidence
Per curiam, the circuit finds the district court properly denied the parents' motion to amend or correct the dismissal of their claims against a school district after their son, who suffers from cerebral palsy, was allegedly injured by a district employee who helped him use the bathroom on a school trip. The education and disability claims were dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The parents fail to show the court made a cognizable “mistake” of law under the cited rule of civil procedure. Affirmed.
Court: 5th Circuit, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 23-40474, Categories: civil Rights, Education, Negligence
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
Per curiam, the circuit finds the district court properly dismissed civil rights claims filed by the individual against whom criminal trespass warnings were issued. He asserts more than 100 civil claims seeking millions of dollars in damages. Qualified immunity shields officials performing discretionary functions from civil liability. Affirmed.
Court: 5th Circuit, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 23-11190, Categories: civil Rights, Government, Damages
J. Chutkan denies a motion to reconsider a determination that a search warrant, which led officers to search a house where the suspect they were seeking did not live, was valid. The court's decision not to grant the searched civilians' request for an adverse inference based on the absence of a report from the database a detective said he searched before seeking the warrant was not "outcome determinative," a school employee's statement to the detective has not been shown to be inadmissible hearsay, a form used to confirm the address was not inadmissible by reason of being unauthenticated, and the searched civilians did not timely raise issues with testimony that another officer conducted a second database search, the admission of which would have been harmless error if it was error at all.
Court: USDC District of Columbia, Judge: Chutkan, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 1:17cv1046, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, Constitution
J. Copenhaver grants the Board of Education's motion to dismiss the elementary school counselor’s suit claiming the Board violated her right to freedom of speech and the West Virginia Whistleblower Act. The counselor alleged the Board and school officials took retaliatory action against her by, among other things, formally reprimanding her and removing her as the coordinator of the standardized test after she expressed concerns to school officials as well as gave an interview to a Charleston television station about the resumption of a national standardized test to occur on school premises in April 2021 during the Covid-19 pandemic. The court finds since her pleading is grounded in her capacity as a public employee and not a private citizen, she has failed to state a claim on which relief can be granted, and the Board's interest in effectively and efficiently administering the standardized test outweigh the counselor's public airing of her concerns.
Court: USDC Southern District of West Virginia, Judge: Copenhaver, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv314, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, Education, Covid-19
J. Peterson grants the resident partial summary judgment for her Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) claim in her complaint accusing the housing authority of evicting her from its Alderwood Apartments without notice after her abusive husband, a veteran who obtained housing with a Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing voucher, removed her as a beneficiary of his VASH voucher with the housing authority's help but without notifying the resident. The housing authority claims that it had no obligation to give the resident notice of its actions because she was not the head of the household or the VASH voucher holder, but the VAWA requires that all adult tenants are sent notice of such actions.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Peterson, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv1757, NOS: Housing/Accommodations - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, Housing
J. Cogburn denies a food production company’s motion for summary judgment following allegations of retaliation brought by a former delivery driver. After several work-related injuries and complaints about being pushed to work beyond the accommodations recommended by her doctor, the driver unbuckled her seat belt to roll a window down to talk to another driver who was yelling at her. She then replaced her seat belt. Not long after, the company fired her, citing her violation of their strict seat belt policy. Based on the timing, the driver has sufficient evidence to proceed on the argument that her violation was pretext to her being fired for requesting accommodations.
Court: USDC Western District of North Carolina, Judge: Cogburn, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 3:21cv655, NOS: Other Labor Litigation - Labor, Categories: civil Rights, Employment, Employment Retaliation
J. Brown finds that a school district, a principal and a teacher are not liable for the actions of an older student who touched younger female students inappropriately in the context of a student tutoring program. The district’s training of the teacher and principal is adequate and did not lead to the violations of the female students’ rights. The teacher and the principal are entitled to qualified immunity in that a reasonable person would not suspect that a mentoring program would lead to constitutional violations. Although the offending student violated the constitutional rights of the female students, he is not a state actor because mentorship is not considered a governmental function under Texas law, and the plaintiffs have not provided an authority that would support such a conclusion. The motions of the district, principal and teacher to dismiss are granted.
Court: USDC Northern District of Texas , Judge: Brown, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv1243, NOS: Other Personal Injury - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: civil Rights, Immunity, Negligence
J. Pyle finds that the trial court properly found for prison employees in a prisoner's civil rights claims contending an employee was loud, disruptive, and disrespectful. Meanwhile, the prisoner was properly temporarily removed from employment in the law library since the prisoner's comments on the restroom policy did not constitute speech protected under the first amendment. Affirmed.
Court: Indiana Court Of Appeals, Judge: Pyle, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 23A-CT-201, Categories: civil Rights, Constitution, Prisoners' Rights
J. Aiken dismisses without prejudice the homeowner's complaint that the detective wrongfully arrested him for unlawful possession of heroin and methamphetamine without probable cause. The detective had reason to believe that the homeowner had a usable quantity of heroin because the detective found what he believed was evidence of methamphetamines in the homeowner's bedroom, including used syringes, empty baggies and a piece of foil with a burnt substance.
Court: USDC Oregon, Judge: Aiken, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 6:21cv1648, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, Evidence, Police Misconduct
J. Holmes finds that the lower court properly granted qualified immunity to a handful of police officials after a person who was convicted and then later declared innocent of burglary sued them with claims that they doctored up evidence to wrongfully convict him. It is recognized that our "system’s imperfection" resulted in the man being imprisoned for a crime he did not commit, but he has not gone so far as to show that the officers violated his rights or acted with blatant disregard towards his well-being during their investigation.
Court: 10th Circuit, Judge: Holmes , Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 22-8015, Categories: civil Rights, Immunity
J. Dick grants a request by the state to dismiss as moot a voting rights suit by black litigants that preceded legislative enactment of a new congressional map containing two first-ever majority-black districts. The litigants do not oppose the new congressional map but argue their case is not moot due to pending legislation in the Western District of Louisiana. State officials have sufficiently shown the earlier redistricting conduct challenged by litigants will not recur with the state’s voluntary enactment of a new congressional map with two black-majority districts.
Court: USDC Middle District of Louisiana, Judge: Dick, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv211, NOS: Voting - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, Constitution, Government
J. Hanen finds that evidence does not support an employee’s claims that his prior employer retaliated against him by investigating his conduct after he made complaints about discrimination. There is evidence that the employer initiated the investigation into personal expenditures charged by the employee to the company credit card before the employee made complaints of discrimination so the investigation could not have arisen as a retaliatory action. The employer’s request for summary judgment is granted.
Court: USDC Southern District of Texas, Judge: Hanen, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 4:22cv3454, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, Employment Discrimination
J. Lum finds the lower court erroneously dismissed excessive force claims filed by a suspect shot with specialty impact munitions and a rifle. The suspect was not required to prove the police officer acted with "malice" or that his actions "shocked the conscience;" rather, the standard governing excessive force claims requires only that the force used was objectively unreasonable and started a series of events that led to other officers using excessive force. The officer who fired the nonlethal round without any warning knew the officer with the rifle mistakenly believed the suspect had a gun and knew the nonlethal round would sound like a gunshot; therefore, his actions could be considered excessive and the case will be remanded for the proper analysis. Reversed.
Court: Colorado Court Of Appeals, Judge: Lum, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 2024COA42, Categories: Civil Procedure, civil Rights, Evidence
J. Rodriguez denies an organization’s motion for an injunction and temporary restraining order after it sued the city of Kerrville, arguing local ordinances on “peddlers and solicitors” and “electioneering” violate the First Amendment. Despite expressing “generalized” concerns about the ordinances, the suing parties have not shown specific plans to engage in proscribed conduct and therefore lack standing for a restraining order.
Court: USDC Western District of Texas , Judge: Rodriguez, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 5:24cv403, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, Government, First Amendment
J. Trauger grants the restaurant defendants' motion for summary judgment in this lawsuit brought by a former employee alleging age discrimination in connection with his termination. The former employee, who worked as a general manager, fails to show that his termination was due to his age. The defendants cited "his restaurant's culture, as evidenced by the complaints," and he does not establish that the reason was pretext for discrimination.
Court: USDC Middle District of Tennessee , Judge: Trauger, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv885, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, Evidence, Employment Discrimination
J. Easterbrook finds that the lower court improperly found for the school in a Title IX sex discrimination suit filed by a male medical student who was found to have physically abused a female student off-campus. The medical student was not expelled until he applied to the university's business school and described his mere suspension as an "exoneration," which the dean of the medical school found to be a falsification. The male student should have been given notice and an opportunity to defend himself before summary expulsion. However, in order to continue with this suit, the male student must disclose his full name, as he is neither a minor nor at risk of improper retaliation. Vacated.
Court: 7th Circuit, Judge: Easterbrook, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 22-1576, Categories: civil Rights, Education
J. Bloom approves a state commission’s motion to dismiss employment discrimination claim by a former employee who alleged he was harassed and fired due to a disability that made him fall asleep on the job. Because the former employee took no action for more than two years after initiating the case, he did not make a good faith effort to serve notice, as required.
Court: USDC Middle District of Pennsylvania, Judge: Bloom, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv1820, NOS: Civil Rights - Habeas Corpus, Categories: civil Rights, Employment Discrimination, Employment Retaliation