2,825 results for 'cat:"Civil Rights"'.
J. Barrett denies the student's motion for a preliminary injunction, ruling the university provided him notice of the sexual assault allegations within a month of the victim's submission of her final report and did not rely on any absent witness testimony when it expelled him; therefore, no due process rights were violated during disciplinary proceedings and the student is not entitled to an injunction.
Court: USDC Southern District of Ohio, Judge: Barrett, Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv284, NOS: Education - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, Education, Due Process
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Bennett grants the commission’s motion to dismiss this employment dispute brought by a former employee alleging wrongful termination and retaliation after she complained that an external speaker used the word “negro” during a presentation. She claims retaliation in violation of the Maryland Fair Employment Practices Act and Title VII, but fails to plausibly allege she was engaged in a protected activity or an adverse action. The court finds she cannot cure her defects by amending her complaint. Therefore, the clerk shall close this case and it is dismissed with prejudice.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Bennett, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv2492, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, Employment Retaliation
J. Singh grants a motion to file a third amended complaint in claims alleging police harassed plaintiff, a Black man who lives in Pennsylvania, whenever he drove into New Jersey, and claims contending police interrogated his mother, because details about additional police officers came to light during discovery, and the pleading would not be barred by any statute of limitations.
Court: USDC New Jersey, Judge: Singh, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 3:19cv21164, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Procedure, civil Rights, Discovery
J. Mehalchick denies a nursing home’s motion for summary judgment concerning a former employee’s Fair Labor Standards Act claim alleging a failure to pay overtime compensation. There is a question of material fact as to whether the former employee’s primary duty was managerial and thus exempt from overtime compensation. The former employee’s motion for partial summary judgement for liquidated damages was also denied since the decision would be merely advisory.
Court: USDC Middle District of Pennsylvania, Judge: Mehalchick, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv828, NOS: Fair Labor Standards Act - Labor, Categories: civil Rights, Employment, Erisa
J. Reidinger dismisses an incarcerated man’s complaint that the wires holding his rib cage together following triple bypass surgery broke and are causing him pain. The surgery occurred before he was incarcerated, and the man brings the complaint against his surgeon under a federal legal code. However, the code can only be used against state or federal officials, which the surgeon is not. The man is allowed to amend his complaint within 30 days.
Court: USDC Western District of North Carolina, Judge: Reidinger, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 1:24cv132, NOS: Mandamus & Other - Habeas Corpus, Categories: civil Rights, Health Care, Prisoners' Rights
J. Rothstein dismisses the job applicant's class action alleging that the furniture company violated Washington law by not posting the wage scale or salary of its job opening. The job applicant fails to state his claim because while intangible injuries like the omission of statutorily required information can be concrete, the job applicant actually alleges a technical violation because the job posting's lack of information does not harm or create a material risk of harm to any single person's concrete interest.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Rothstein, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv1742, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, Employment, Class Action
J. Jackson-Akiwumi finds that the lower court improperly granted qualified immunity to two probation officers who failed to release a man jailed for a probation violation months after his probation should have been over. The officers' jobs involved correcting unlawfully long probation terms, but they did nothing when they discovered the error, not even tell someone about the problem. Their decision to do nothing about the mistake was egregious and unreasonable. Reversed.
Court: 7th Circuit, Judge: Jackson-Akiwumi, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 21-3332, Categories: civil Rights, Immunity
J. Eagles partially grants a medical doctor’s motion for summary judgment in her suit against the state for its strict regulatory laws regarding Mifeprex, an abortion-inducing drug. While the FDA eased restrictions on the drug in 2007, North Carolina kept the same restrictions and added more to its own legislation, which now conflict with federal law. However, federal law in this case trumps state law. Thus, the state provisions requiring physician-only prescribing; in-person prescribing, dispensing and administering; scheduling of an in-person follow-up appointment; and non-fatal adverse event reporting are unconstitutional.
Court: USDC Middle District of North Carolina, Judge: Eagles, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv77, NOS: Constitutionality of State Statutes - Other Suits, Categories: civil Rights, Constitution, Health Care
J. Mehalchick denies a borough’s motion to dismiss an age and disability discrimination claim brought by a former police officer who says he was forced to retire. The former police officer’s allegations were plausible because he was over 40, qualified for his job, hearing-impaired and replaced by a younger employee.
Court: USDC Middle District of Pennsylvania, Judge: Mehalchick, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv912, NOS: Civil Rights - Habeas Corpus, Categories: civil Rights, Employment Discrimination, Employment Retaliation
J. Pepper grants the nail salon owner's motion to proceed without prepaying the filing fee in her lawsuit alleging a former friend maliciously slandered her and her business on social media. In part because there is a lack of clarity in the complaint regarding jurisdiction, the owner is given until June 7, 2024, to file an amended complaint. If she does not, her lawsuit will be dismissed.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Wisconsin, Judge: Pepper, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 2:24cv8, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, Defamation
J. Sykes finds that the lower court properly found for the village on a developer's claims that it was singled out for unfavorable treatment. The developer failed to show that the village's decisions lacked any conceivable rational basis. Rather, the village's imposed development conditions were rationally related to its interests in promoting its land-use objectives. Affirmed.
Court: 7th Circuit, Judge: Sykes, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 21-3237, Categories: civil Rights, Real Estate
J. Vilardo rules in part for county officials in claims contending an inmate died from acute respiratory failure for lack of proper supervision because evidence did not indicate that anyone other than a single nurse ordered any actions, that the nurse had a prior track record of failing to follow procedure, or that the county trained medical staff at the holding center with deliberate indifference.
Court: USDC Western District of New York, Judge: Vilardo , Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 1:20cv1689, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, Negligence, Wrongful Death