189 results for 'cat:"Civil Procedure" AND cat:"Civil Rights"'.
J. Larimer rules in part for a company accused of reducing cashiers' hours and rescheduling them for complaining that a manager drew sexually explicit pictures of them. The right to sue letter from the equal employment opportunity commission was not conclusively received by a certain date, so the complaint is not time-barred, but evidence does not indicate a second manager took part in any harassment.
Court: USDC Western District of New York, Judge: Larimer , Filed On: June 1, 2023, Case #: 6:23cv6053, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Procedure, civil Rights, Employment
J. Ray stays all discovery-related deadlines in two civil rights actions and recommends that the individual's motion to set aside default should be granted and that the cases should be consolidated. The individual's delay in filing a timely responsive pleading was due to his mistaken belief that he had been served with two copies of the same action. The other individual is directed to show cause as to why he should not be sanctioned for multiple miscitations to legal authority in his response to an earlier order.
Court: USDC Southern District of Georgia, Judge: Ray, Filed On: May 30, 2023, Case #: 4:23cv47, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Procedure, civil Rights
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Treadwell denies the employee's motion for reconsideration of an earlier order partially granting the employer's motions to dismiss a civil rights and race discrimination action arising from the employer's alleged failure to reclassify the employee, an appraiser, to a higher position. The employee failed to follow the court's instructions in amending her complaint, therefore her allegations with regard to liability for pay discrimination based on events that happened years before she filed her charge of discrimination with the EEOC were properly struck from the second amended complaint.
Court: USDC Middle District of Georgia, Judge: Treadwell, Filed On: May 30, 2023, Case #: 5:21cv239, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Procedure, civil Rights, Employment Discrimination
J. Miller finds the juvenile court improperly terminated “transition jurisdiction” of the non-minor ward by which he may continue to receive benefits after termination of the wardship. The autistic ward’s childhood was characterized by neglect, abuse, criminal behaviors and homelessness while within the foster care system. Findings in the written order provide that his remaining under juvenile court jurisdiction is not in his best interests, continuing, “facts supporting this determination were stated on the record.” Yet, there was no discussion of any best interest findings. Reversed and remanded.
Court: California Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Miller, Filed On: May 23, 2023, Case #: A165931, Categories: civil Procedure, civil Rights, Guardianship