358 results for 'court:"USDC Northern District of Texas "'.
J. Fitzwater denies, in part, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's motion for a protective order quashing subpoenas served on four non-party witnesses in its case against an airline. Although the individuals need not produce the requested text messages, which would be duplicative of information already provided by the EEOC, the airline will be able to depose the individuals, as the depositions are not outside the scope of discovery.
Court: USDC Northern District of Texas , Judge: Fitzwater, Filed On: January 8, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv1807, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Employment, Discovery
J. Kacsmaryk finds for a nonprofit on its Freedom of Information Act case seeking 7.8 million text responses to the government's call for information from those who received a Covid-19 vaccine, including symptoms, adverse events, hospitalization or treatment, and safety issues. Production of the data, which will include the registrant number but redact personal identifying information, is not unreasonably burdensome.
Court: USDC Northern District of Texas , Judge: Kacsmaryk, Filed On: January 5, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv102, NOS: Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) - Other Suits, Categories: Health Care, Public Record, Covid-19
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Horan denies a trustee's motion for summary judgment in its foreclosure case against the homeowners due, in part, to inconsistencies in the payment transaction history.
Court: USDC Northern District of Texas , Judge: Horan, Filed On: December 29, 2023, Case #: 3:23cv237, NOS: Foreclosure - Real Property, Categories: Property, Banking / Lending, Contract
J. Pittman dismisses a couple's pro se foreclosure-related action against a lender. The couple fails to sufficiently allege their claims for slander of title and credit, nor can they support their breach of contract claim, as they have admitted default.
Court: USDC Northern District of Texas , Judge: Pittman, Filed On: December 19, 2023, Case #: 4:23cv534, NOS: Consumer Credit - Other Suits, Categories: Property, Banking / Lending, Contract
J. Pittman denies, in part, United Airlines motion to dismiss employees' challenge to the airlines now-rescinded Covid-19 vaccine mandate. The employees may pursue their claim for a permanent injunction because, although the airline voluntarily ended its mandate, there is no guarantee it will not impose the vaccine again.
Court: USDC Northern District of Texas , Judge: Pittman, Filed On: December 18, 2023, Case #: 4:21cv1074, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Employment, Covid-19, Injunction
J. O'Connor denies the government a new trial after a jury awarded more than $23 million to a man who became a quadriplegic following a car collision with a postal truck. The damages award, which includes consideration of his past and future physical impairment and his current amputations and expected lifespan, is reasonable.
Court: USDC Northern District of Texas , Judge: O'Connor, Filed On: December 15, 2023, Case #: 4:22cv147, NOS: Motor Vehicle - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Tort, Vehicle, Damages
J. Boyle grants, in part, a healthcare billing company's motion to seal or redact certain exhibits in a false claims case regarding its alleged failure to timely bill liable third-parties, costing Medicaid agency clients millions. Certain exhibits, such as those concerning industry-specific business processes, warrant redaction.
Court: USDC Northern District of Texas , Judge: Boyle, Filed On: December 13, 2023, Case #: 3:19cv920, NOS: Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)) - Torts - Personal Property, Categories: Civil Procedure, Health Care, False Claims
J. Lindsay grants, in part, a group of businesses' motion for reconsideration of the admissibility of expert testimony in an insurance coverage dispute concerning a roof. Although one of the experts is not qualified to testify whether the roof needs to be replaced rather than repaired, he can testify as to the damage to the roof and the causes of damage.
Court: USDC Northern District of Texas , Judge: Lindsay, Filed On: December 12, 2023, Case #: 3:16cv2255, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Insurance, Experts