168 results for 'court:"Court of Federal Claims"'.
J. Tapp denies the parties summary judgment in claims concerning the method with which damages were assessed in this rails-to-trails takings claim. Property owners may offer expert testimony concerning how future ease of the easement would effect market value.
Court: Court of Federal Claims, Judge: Tapp, Filed On: August 2, 2023, Case #: 16-912, Categories: Property, Damages
J. Tapp denies the parties summary judgment in takings claims because genuine issues remain in dispute as to whether the railroad would have abandoned the property had the U.S. not intervened.
Court: Court of Federal Claims, Judge: Tapp, Filed On: July 21, 2023, Case #: 19-875L, Categories: Property
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Davis finds for the bidding company in this pre-award bid protest for a contract for shelf stocking and custodial services at the Dover air force base commissary because the defense commissary agency abused its discretion by removing the bid from consideration without giving the company an opportunity to clarify an error.
Court: Court of Federal Claims, Judge: Davis, Filed On: June 13, 2023, Case #: 23-253, Categories: Contract
J. Kaplan denies a shipbuilder's motion to supplement the record in a post-award bid protest concerning a contract to provide the Coast Guard with Offshore Patrol Cutter 2. The indictment and the SEC complaint both derive from unrelated contract claims filed six years earlier and do not indicate that the procurement decision had been made unfairly.
Court: Court of Federal Claims, Judge: Kaplan, Filed On: June 12, 2023, Case #: 22-1571C, Categories: Civil Procedure, Contract
J. Tapp finds for the U.S. in this post-award bid protest for a contract to provide office administrative services at Kirkland Air Force Base because the U.S. properly reviewed the proposals and fairly considered all candidates.
Court: Court of Federal Claims, Judge: Tapp, Filed On: June 8, 2023, Case #: 22-1811, Categories: Contract
J. Davis finds for the U.S. in this post-award bid protest concerning a contract agreement for agile salesforce portal development and support services because the decision awarding the contract was not arbitrary or capricious.
Court: Court of Federal Claims, Judge: Davis, Filed On: June 7, 2023, Case #: 22-1913, Categories: Contract
J. Roumel grants the U.S. dismissal of breach contract claims brought after the small business association denied an entertainment company a grant because the company failed to state a claim for breach of contract as a matter of law.
Court: Court of Federal Claims, Judge: Roumel, Filed On: June 7, 2023, Case #: 22cv1453, Categories: Contract
[Consolidated.] J. Meyers finds in favor of the bidding companies in part in this post-award bid protest for contracts to provide IT support services. There is sufficient evidence the evaluation process was capricious and arbitrary against four of the bidding companies. The motion for injunctive relief is granted to allow the agency to re-evaluate the proposals.
Court: Court of Federal Claims, Judge: Meyers, Filed On: June 2, 2023, Case #: 22-1380C, Categories: Government, Contract
J. Futey allows a shuttle company to continue claims alleging beach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing related to a contract to provide shuttle services because the company sufficiently pleaded facts supporting the claims.
Court: Court of Federal Claims, Judge: Futey, Filed On: May 26, 2023, Case #: 20-123C, Categories: Contract
J. Bruggink declines to dismiss this pre-award bid protest for a contract to provide medical services to illegal immigrants held in ICE facilities because one of the disqualified companies had been excluded from competing for the bid despite registering properly.
Court: Court of Federal Claims, Judge: Bruggink, Filed On: May 24, 2023, Case #: 23-47C, Categories: Contract
J. Tapp grants a company a preliminary injunction to prevent the U.S. from awarding a contract to a competitor that failed to meet the requirements of the solicitation clause federal acquisition regulation.
Court: Court of Federal Claims, Judge: Tapp, Filed On: May 23, 2023, Case #: 23-443, Categories: Contract