1,683 results for 'nos:"Other Contract - Contract"'.
J. Novak denies Mercedes' motion to dismiss breach of warranty claims. A consumer purchased a van that, despite seven visits to three agents of the manufacturer, still does not function properly. The manufacturer wrongly claims the van doesn't fall under the federal warranty law because it is a commercial vehicle, but the consumer uses it as his personal vehicle.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Virginia, Judge: Novak, Filed On: April 18, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv755, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Vehicle, Warranty, Contract
J. Hurd partially denies Hamilton College’s motion for summary judgment and preserves a male college student’s Title IX and breach of contract claims alleging the college’s decision to expel him on charges of sexual assault was motivated by anti-male bias. The court finds a jury could conclude the college exhibited gender bias due to several irregularities in his hearing, as well as external pressures from the U.S. Department of Education to aggressively pursue complaints of sexual misconduct.
Court: USDC Northern District of New York, Judge: Hurd, Filed On: April 18, 2024, Case #: 6:22cv214, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Education
J. Cain grants summary judgment to a salvage business on its breach of contract claim against a maritime company that refused to pay its $207,000 bill for the successful recovery of its sunken river barge. The company unsuccessfully argued the fee was excessive, adding it expected its insurer to pay for the barge recovery and would not have allowed the salvage to proceed if it had known its insurer would deny the claim. The failure of the barge owner to pay any portion of the undisputed amount is a breach of the marine contract. A factual dispute remains as to whether the salvage business performed all of the services listed in its invoices and whether the barge owner was overcharged for divers, materials or transport days.
Court: USDC Western District of Louisiana , Judge: Cain, Filed On: April 17, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv626, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Damages, Business Practices, Business Expectancy
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Fitzwater finds that a tobacco store did not breach its lease for advertising CBD and other products because they are legal and commonly found in tobacco stores. But the store did breach its lease for selling bongs and pipes which are specifically prohibited in the terms of the contract. Summary judgment is granted to the tobacco store on the CBD claims, as well as to the property owner on the bong and pipe claims. The court grants the tobacco store leave to file an opposition response to summary judgment granted to the owner.
Court: USDC Northern District of Texas , Judge: Fitzwater, Filed On: April 17, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv781, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Property, Contract
J. Gilliam allows some class false advertising claims to proceed against Bob’s Red Mill Natural Food over the presence of cadmium in its flaxseed products, despite claims on the packaging that the products are healthy. Several of the claims are tossed for not being able to show that the trace amounts found in the products pose any kind of health risk, but some proceed on the grounds that the alleged misrepresentations still resulted in consumers overpaying for them.
Court: USDC Northern District of California, Judge: Gilliam, Filed On: April 16, 2024, Case #: 4:23cv3862, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Class Action, False Advertising
J. Hansen finds that partners in a business that broke up during a mortgage default are still liable for the remaining debt after foreclosure per the clear, enforceable language of the mortgage agreement. One of the partners in the business break-up, who controlled the mortgage, is liable for indemnification of the other partners under the applicable laws. An issue of fact as to which partner signed the mortgage shall be resolved at trial.
Court: USDC Southern District of Texas, Judge: Hansen, Filed On: April 16, 2024, Case #: 4:22cv3901, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Bankruptcy, Corporations, Debt Collection
J. Vitter finds for a two-member limited liability corporation in Louisiana, holding two Texas-based LLCs jointly liable for the outstanding balance of a $4 million loan. Although the obligation was vested to one LLC by operation of a merger, the original borrower-LLC was never released from its obligation under the promissory note. Furthermore, while the original borrower validly allocated its obligation under the promissory note to the other Texas LLC in the merger, thereby making it the primary obligor of the note under Texas law, nothing in Texas law supports that original borrowing LLC extinguished all liability via the merger.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Louisiana , Judge: Vitter, Filed On: April 16, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv1707, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Corporations, Banking / Lending, Contract
J. Cole mostly denies a class of truck drivers’ motion for more discovery in this long-running case over a railroad operator potentially violating biometric privacy law. The court broadly sides with the railroad operator in its assertion that it has already provided the class of drivers with all the discovery documents they are entitled to, but nevertheless orders the operator to compile a privilege log regarding its communications with a third-party software company.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Cole, Filed On: April 15, 2024, Case #: 1:20cv390, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Privacy, Discovery, Class Action
J. Snyder denies a company's motion to dismiss a business founder's allegations that after acquiring his business, the company violated the put agreement by failing to pay his retention bonus or fund the purchase of his remaining shares. Diversity jurisdiction has been established. The founder has sufficiently alleged his promissory fraud claim. The put agreement does not waive the founder's right to a jury trial. A stay is not warranted, as the arbitration proceedings are limited to employment agreement disputes, while this matter is regarding a put agreement dispute.
Court: USDC Central District of California, Judge: Snyder, Filed On: April 15, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv9055, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Fraud, Jurisdiction, Contract
J. Hall trims a class action against an energy services broker that was sued by a group of property owners who say it charged them exorbitant variable monthly rates for gas services following the automatic renewal of their respective agreements. The only claim to survive is one for implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, finding the property owners reasonably expected their rates to be based on current market prices or, at the very least, not double the initial rate after their contracts were renewed.
Court: USDC Eastern District of New York, Judge: Hall, Filed On: April 15, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv3664, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Energy, Class Action
J. Immergut denies summary judgment to the owner, the ranch and the livestock company for their counterclaim alleging that the cattle company sold 9,900 cattle as part of a partnership, but wrongfully withheld the sales proceeds. There is a genuine dispute as to whether the cattle company improperly kept the cattle sale proceeds from the sale of the partnership cattle.
Court: USDC Oregon, Judge: Immergut, Filed On: April 15, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv768, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Fraud, Partnerships, Contract
J. Nye grants a company's motion to quash portions of a subpoena during the discovery process of a contract dispute. An attorney has been acting as an agent for the company, sharing litigation strategy, so although the attorney does not represent the company, his communications qualify for work-product protection. As a witness-attorney, the attorney is forbidden "from acting as an advocate at trial, but not in pre-trial activities."
Court: USDC Idaho, Judge: Nye, Filed On: April 12, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv399, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Contract
J. Martinez denies summary judgment to the logistics company for an unjust enrichment claim in the sporting goods company's complaint alleging that the logistics company did not take reasonable precautions to protect the sporting goods company and other customers from a February 2022 cyberattack. The sporting goods company plausibly alleges that the logistics company benefited from charging the sporting goods company for its business when the logistics company shut down following the cyberattack.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Martinez, Filed On: April 11, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv1816, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Contract
J. Kahn declines to dismiss on jurisdictional grounds a breach of contract complaint against a California-based security services company, who was sued by a consultant for allegedly failing to pay him his 5% commission fee for helping with the sale of its company. The company waived its right to challenge the consultancy agreement’s forum selection clause designating New York courts as the preferred venue.
Court: USDC Northern District of New York, Judge: Kahn, Filed On: April 11, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv1408, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Jurisdiction, Venue, Contract
J. Guzman finds a company director did not breach her fiduciary duties when she cut off her brother, the company creator’s, access to company accounts. The company creator is not a company shareholder or officer.
Court: USDC Massachusetts, Judge: Guzman, Filed On: April 11, 2024, Case #: 4:21cv40060, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Fiduciary Duty, Defamation, Contract
J. Sippel finds for the subcontractor in a contract dispute with a general contractor seeking to recover costs after it terminated the subcontractor from a construction project. The general contractor is not entitled to recover any excess costs under the contract because it did not provide written notice to the subcontractor of why it was being kicked off the project as required by the contract.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Missouri, Judge: Sippel, Filed On: April 11, 2024, Case #: 4:22cv1105, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Construction, Contract
J. Rochon affirms a magistrate judge's order to transfer venue of this breach of contract suit to New Jersey. The plaintiff supermarket alleges the defendant supermarket used its influence as a member of a grocery co-op to induce the co-op to breach its agreement to supply the plaintiff supermarket with private-label groceries. The supply agreement contains a New Jersey choice-of-forum clause, and a non-signatory may enforce that agreement given that the co-op is an integral party to resolution of this dispute.
Court: USDC Southern District of New York, Judge: Rochon, Filed On: April 11, 2024, Case #: 1:22cv7996, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Interference With Contract, Venue, Contract