124 results for 'filedAt:"2024-04-23"'.
J. Cullen grants the foundation repair company's motion to dismiss in an employment discrimination suit. The salesman claims his manager engaged in favoritism, publicly criticized him, manipulated the distribution of leads, and pressured him to use unethical sales tactics, which the salesman refused to carry out. The salesman later disclosed his mental health struggles, including suicidal ideations and poor mental health. The manager claimed to fire him for poor sales numbers, but the salesman felt his termination was pretextual. The salesman failed to provide any facts that would support his theory that he was discriminated against because of his mental health issues.
Court: USDC Western District of Virginia, Judge: Cullen, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 7:23cv638, Categories: Ada / Rehabilitation Act, Employment, Employment Discrimination
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
Per curiam, the appellate division finds that the lower court improperly dismissed an employee's race discrimination claims against the city. The employee raised an inference of racial animus through allegations of differential treatment of similarly situated white officers. Reversed.
Court: New York Appellate Divisions, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 02156, Categories: Employment Discrimination
Per curiam, the appellate division finds that the lower court properly granted the university's motion to dismiss a former student's petition to reinstate her to an occupational therapy master's program. The student was dismissed based on her failing grade in a required course, and was reasonably provided accommodations for her multiple health and learning disabilities. Affirmed.
Court: New York Appellate Divisions, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 02159, Categories: Education, Due Process
J. Self grants the product seller's motion to dismiss a trademark infringement action brought by the ammunition design company arising from the seller's alleged sale of a product infringing on the "Quik-Shok" mark. The company failed to present evidence supporting the exercise of personal jurisdiction over the Virginia-based seller and has not shown that the seller regularly conducts business in or derives substantial revenue from Georgia. Only two of the seller's 5,300 orders were sold to Georgia residents and neither order was for the allegedly infringing product. The company also failed to show that any transaction occurred between the seller and the manufacturer of the infringing product at a Georgia trade show.
Court: USDC Middle District of Georgia, Judge: Self, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 5:23cv512, NOS: Trademark - Property Rights, Categories: Trademark, Jurisdiction
J. Martin finds that the lower court properly declared the state board's decision to revoke the school's charter unlawful. The school has standing to pursue judicial review of the board's determination because 2012 amendments to the law did not signal legislative intent to prohibit judicial review pursuant to the Missouri Administrative Protection Act after revocation of a charter. Affirmed.
Court: Missouri Court Of Appeals, Judge: Martin, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: WD86457, Categories: Administrative Law, Education, Jurisdiction
J. Young grants the insurance company's motion to dismiss an indemnification suit. The transport manager hired to haul construction equipment suffered an injury offloading when the site supervisor improperly used a Bobcat to take heavy amounts of rebar off a truck bed. The improper use, failing to lower the hydraulic lift cylinder to balance the weight of the load, caused the Bobcat to tip over, releasing the stack of rebar onto the manager. This caused a fractured left ankle, a fractured arm requiring surgery and permanent crush injuries to his left foot. The manager's insurance policy covered incidents from the insured tractor-trailer, not the Bobcat.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Virginia, Judge: Young, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv67, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Construction, Insurance, Indemnification
J. Ledet finds that the trial court properly dismissed a borrower's reconventional demand against the lender on the lender's petition for executory process to foreclose on the mortgage loan. In this case, the borrower did not provide a written agreement to base her claims that the mortgage servicer advised her not to take action as the fraud investigation was ongoing. Further, the borrower did not properly state a cause of action under the Louisiana Unfair Trade Practices Act because the Act exempts federally insured financial institutions, their subsidiaries, and their affiliates from its jurisdiction. Affirmed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Ledet, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 2023-CA-0747, Categories: Banking / Lending, Contract
J. Ebel finds that the lower court properly convicted defendant of sexual abuse against a minor. Defendant claims on appeal that the lower court improperly allowed a 50-minute video recording of a forensic interview with the child victim, which defendant says violated the rules regarding hearsay. The interview in question, however, was supported by "sufficient guarantees of trustworthiness" and had enough value to the proceedings to outweigh any evidence-related issues. Affirmed.
Court: 10th Circuit, Judge: Ebel, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 22-7033, Categories: Evidence, Sex Offender, Child Victims
J. Martin finds that the lower court properly granted defendant's motion to suppress statements he made during a police interrogation while he was being treated in the emergency room for a self-inflicted gunshot wound. The statements were subject to suppression because police did not advise defendant of his Miranda rights before questioning him. Affirmed.
Court: Missouri Court Of Appeals, Judge: Martin, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: WD86602, Categories: Firearms, Miranda
J. Singh finds that the lower court improperly found defendant does not suffer from a mental abnormality that predisposes him to commit sexual offenses by conflating legal standards in its assessments of the state's case. Further, the court improperly relied upon extra-record psychological research on several important issues, such as the effect of opioid use on sexual offending without notifying the parties. Reversed.
Court: New York Appellate Divisions, Judge: Singh, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 02158, Categories: Sex Offender, Commitment
J. Rivera finds that the appellate division improperly held that changes to for-profit nursing homes' Medicaid rates could not be made retroactively because legislation authorizing the changes to help close a state budget gap specified an April 1 effective date, and new rates were not made retroactive when homes were notified months after federal approval. Meanwhile, the usual 60-day advance notice requirement was not applicable due to the urgency of the fiscal crisis. Reversed in part.
Court: New York Court Of Appeals, Judge: Rivera, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 31, Categories: Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Medicaid
[Consolidated.] J. Cannataro finds that the tax appeals tribunal properly denied corporate tax deductions to Walt Disney and IBM based on their foreign affiliates' royalty payments on licensed intellectual property. For a decade, New York allowed companies that paid franchise taxes to deduct income received as royalty payments if the affiliates already paid a state tax on the same income, as long as companies included the royalty payments when calculating their own taxable income. However, the affiliates operate overseas and thus are not subject to that provision, and royalty deductions do not apply. Affirmed.
Court: New York Court Of Appeals, Judge: Cannataro, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 34, Categories: Corporations, Commerce, Tax
J. Campbell enters a default judgment against a transitional home staffing service in the amount of $90,000 for unpaid wages and overtime. The staffing service failed to respond to an employee's allegations that it misclassified her as an independent contractor and failed to pay her for overtime when she worked 16 hours a day, 7 days a week as a sober home manager.
Court: USDC Arizona, Judge: Campbell, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv1882, NOS: Fair Labor Standards Act - Labor, Categories: Employment, Damages
J. Parker denies the appellants' motions for rehearing and en banc reconsideration, withdraws the court's prior opinion, and substitutes the current memorandum opinion, holding that the lower court properly denied their dismissal motion pursuant the Texas Citizens Participation Act. The court concludes that the claims at issue in this case, involving allegations of fraudulent transfer, are not based on the exercise of the right to petition. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Parker, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 07-23-00271-CV, Categories: Civil Procedure, Fraud
J. Pittman finds that a litigant of a previous divorce proceeding does not have standing to sue judges and attorneys involved in the divorce case because both are immune from such actions. Furthermore, the litigant has produced no evidence to support their RICO claims that involve a scheme between judges, attorneys and the litigant’s bank to launder money through attorney fees to pay for property purchases. The litigant’s case is dismissed.
Court: USDC Northern District of Texas , Judge: Pittman, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 4:23cv758, NOS: Other Statutory Actions - Other Suits, Categories: Immunity, Jurisdiction, Racketeering
J. Rodriguez partially grants a subcontractor’s motion to dismiss after it was sued by a company that had contracted it for IT work, which said that the subcontractor did not have “the specialized knowledge to develop the IT system” as it claimed and had other irregularities in its work, including double billing and improper installation. While the hiring company can proceed with its lawsuit, it cannot bring claims under the Computer Fraud Abuse Act, as even under the suing company's version of events, the subcontractor “had at least some authorization to access the IT system at issue.”
Court: USDC Western District of Texas , Judge: Rodriguez, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 5:23cv1038, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Negligence, Contract, Technology
J. Yegan finds that defendant's bid for resentencing on a provocative act murder conviction failed because it is still a valid theory of murder. The legislature had the opportunity but chose not to eliminate provocative act murder when it eliminated the natural and probable consequences theory of murder. Affirmed.
Court: California Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Yegan, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: B323640, Categories: Murder, Sentencing
J. Valderrama partially grants an American medical technology company’s motion for summary judgment for non-willfulness as to a Chinese medical technology company’s patent infringement claims. The Chinese company claims the U.S. company deliberately infringed on its patent for a fingertip pulse oximeter and an associated display. The court grants the U.S. company’s motion as to its pre-suit activities, but finds that factual disputes mean judgment on its post-suit activities inappropriate.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Valderrama, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 1:18cv825, NOS: Patent - Property Rights, Categories: Health Care, Patent, Technology