117 results for 'filedAt:"2024-04-09"'.
J. Trauger grants in part the third-party defendant's dismissal motion in this dispute involving alleged violations of the Fair Housing Act at an apartment complex. The third-party complaint, which was brought by the previous property owner and a developer, alleges that the architect had a duty to design the property in compliance "with all applicable codes, rules, and regulations" and asserts claims for indemnification and breach of contract. The state law claim for equitable indemnification is dismissed, as "it is preempted under the FHA." The equitable contribution claim is not preempted, however, and it survives dismissal.
Court: USDC Middle District of Tennessee , Judge: Trauger, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv297, NOS: Housing/Accommodations - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Procedure, Housing, Indemnification
J. Vaughan finds that the lower court properly revoked defendant's pretrial release based on his arrest for disorderly conduct while on release. The record shows that defendant has repeatedly been charged with domestic violence against family members, who are unable to control his mental health or substance abuse issues, and these incidents are escalating in severity making him a danger to others when released. Affirmed.
Court: Illinois Appellate Court, Judge: Vaughan, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: 240120, Categories: Bail, Domestic Violence
J. Kennedy finds that the lower court improperly found for the restaurant on a man's negligence claim alleging it failed to provide adequate protective barrier to prevent cars from crashing into the restaurant. The man was injured when another patron drove her car into a parking space and continued through the wall into the restaurant. This kind of vehicle crash was reasonably foreseeable and a jury would not need an expert to explain that providing parking elsewhere besides directly in front of the restaurant would have avoided the accident. Reversed.
Court: Illinois Appellate Court, Judge: Kennedy, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: 230026, Categories: Vehicle, Negligence, Experts
J. Albrecht finds that the lower court improperly found for the brokerage firm in a dispute over commissions it failed to pay to two real estate brokers. The brokers earned their commission when they procured fully executed contracts, all of which were "during the term" of their employment agreement. Reversed.
Court: Illinois Appellate Court, Judge: Albrecht, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: 220405, Categories: Employment, Contract
J. Crenshaw grants the company defendants' dismissal motion and remands the remaining claims in this employment dispute based on a lack of jurisdiction. The plaintiff, who worked as an account executive under an "at will employment arrangement," failed to file a timely response to the dismissal motion, and the court additionally finds that the claims "fail on the merits."
Court: USDC Middle District of Tennessee , Judge: Crenshaw, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: 2:24cv8, NOS: Other Labor Litigation - Labor, Categories: Employment, Jurisdiction
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Zahra finds that the airport zoning board was improperly required to grant variances for the construction of eight wind turbines near the airport because the variances were contrary to the public good by creating a risk for planes. Reversed.
Court: Michigan Supreme Court, Judge: Zahra, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: 164261, Categories: Transportation, Zoning
J. Pillard upholds defendant's conviction for demonstrating in the capitol building and his seven-month sentence. The law's prohibition on demonstrating, parading or picketing in the capitol building is not overbroad or vague, and the trial court did not increase his sentence because he exercised his right to trial. Affirmed.
Court: DC Circuit, Judge: Pillard, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: 23-3069 , Categories: Sentencing
J. Young enters judgment in favor of University of Massachusetts officials against an RA who acted sexually inappropriately towards female college students and then sued the university after it took disciplinary action against him, including requiring him to take a remedial behavior class, forbidding him from contacting the victims and banning him from campus housing. While sharing unpopular opinions is sometimes necessarily permitted in university settings for educational discourse, universities also have a duty to protect their students from the misconduct of other students. The RA also touched at least one female student in a way that was unwanted when he touched her feet without consent.
Court: USDC Massachusetts, Judge: Young, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv12077, NOS: Education - Civil Rights, Categories: Education, Housing, First Amendment
[Consolidated.] J. Edwards grants the National Labor Relations Board's application to enforce its order against a hotel requiring it to rescind the room-cleaning quotas demanded of housekeepers after it replaced half of the building's bathtubs with harder-to-clean, glass-walled showers. The hotel failed to give the housekeepers' union a meaningful chance to bargain before altering the workers' duties.
Court: DC Circuit, Judge: Edwards, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: 23-1029 , Categories: Labor / Unions
[Consolidated.] Per curiam, the circuit shuts down challenges made by 17 states and a group of liquid fuel entities to the Environmental Protection Agency's reinstatement of a waiver of federal preemption for two California rules that limit greenhouse gas emissions and require a certain percentage of new cars made in the state be zero-emissions vehicles. The entities and states lack standing to bring their respective statutory and preemption claims, while the states also fail to show the EPA's decision unconstitutionally infringed on states' sovereign authority.
Court: DC Circuit, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: 22-1081 , Categories: Constitution, Energy, Environment
J. Murray finds that the lower court improperly entered summary judgment in favor of a doctor in this medical malpractice suit in which a wife alleges her husband was discharged from a hospital without proper warning about the risk of clotting in the future, resulting in his subsequent death from a pulmonary embolism. The deceased patient’s estate presented sufficient evidence to allow a jury to assign liability against the involved physicians. Reversed.
Court: Pennsylvania Superior Court, Judge: Murray, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: J-A03032-24, Categories: Civil Procedure, Wrongful Death, Medical Malpractice
J. Broderick finds for the equine hospital on breach of contract and fraud claims in a suit over the attempted purchase of a CT scanner for $995,000. While the hospital made down payments on the machine, the defendant manufacturer actually lacked the capacity to make the technology it purported to sell. The manufacturer clearly breached the contract by failing to timely deliver the machine, its only obligation under the agreement, and the hospital incurred damages of $546,000 in down payments it made on a machine that was never delivered.
Court: USDC Southern District of New York, Judge: Broderick, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: 1:18cv6925, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Fraud, Contract
J. Pulliam mostly grants an insurer’s motion for summary judgment in a dispute with policyholders over payout for roof damage, which the insurer contends was largely uncovered wear-and-tear. While the policyholders have not shown bad faith, and the insurer is therefore entitled to summary judgement on most of their claims, the insurer has conversely presented “no specific argument” for dismissing the remainder of the case, including for alleged violations of the Texas Prompt Payment Act.
Court: USDC Western District of Texas , Judge: Pulliam, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: 5:23cv411, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Insurance, Contract
J. White allows a single claim to proceed against Proctor & Gamble from a consumer who say he was tricked into buying a NyQuil product that claimed to have a significant amount of real honey in it, when it had only a small amount of honey. The consumer did not bring forward any evidence that supports his contract and warranty claims, leaving all of them to fail, but there is a potential that some consumers could be misled in regards to what percentage of honey makes up the NyQuil.
Court: USDC Northern District of California, Judge: White, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: 4:23cv5061, NOS: Other Fraud - Torts - Personal Property, Categories: Consumer Law, False Advertising
J. Poissant finds that the mother's parental rights to her son were properly terminated based on sufficient evidence to support the best interest finding. The case worker testified that the mother was homeless and did not have "any type of residence." Also, the child's medical needs were neglected by the mother. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Poissant, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: 14-23-00499-CV, Categories: Evidence, Family Law
Per curiam, the appellate court conditionally grants a writ of mandamus to vacate an order to compel the relator entities to respond to pre-arbitration discovery requests for underlying tort claims. The trial court abused its discretion by delaying a ruling "on the merits of arbitrability until after discovery."
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: 14-23-00872-CV, Categories: Arbitration, Tort, Discovery
J. Mullins finds the hearing officer from the Commission of Motor Vehicles improperly admitted the incident report from the police officer regarding his arrest of the petitioner on DUI charges. The report was not completed within three days of the petitioner's request, as required under Connecticut law. Although the three-day filing requirement contains no prohibitory language, it is mandatory because it ensures the arresting officer's recollection of the incident is accurate and affords the arrested individual due process. Reversed.
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court, Judge: Mullins, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: SC20703, Categories: Civil Procedure, Licensing, Due Process
Per curiam, the appeals court finds the trial court partially erred in denying defendant's motion for postconviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel at his trial which ended in him being convicted of attempted first-degree murder and other charges. The trial court did not attach enough findings to totally refute defendant's claim it denied regarding unimpeached video testimony from the victim, so the case is remanded for the trial court to either hold an evidentiary hearing or attach the needed records. Reversed.
Court: Florida Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: 22-1055, Categories: Evidence, Ineffective Assistance, Murder
J. Brennan denies the consumer's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, ruling her failure to inform the court the amended complaint would include new factual allegations was misleading, while the eight month delay between the filing of the first amended complaint and her motion was not supported by good cause and unnecessarily delayed the litigation.
Court: USDC Southern District of Ohio, Judge: Brennan, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: 1:22cv1111, NOS: Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) - Other Suits, Categories: Civil Procedure, Consumer Law, Class Action
J. Moore finds the lower court erroneously denied the voters' request to convene a three-judge court. Their Fourteenth Amendment claim regarding racial gerrymandering in Ohio raised a federal question that established jurisdiction; therefore, the case will be reinstated to allow the lower court to initiate proceedings to convene a three-judge panel. Reversed.
Court: 6th Circuit, Judge: Moore, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: 23-3910, Categories: Constitution, Elections, Jurisdiction
J. Albregts denies both parties’ motions for summary judgment. The purchaser sues for unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duty, legal malpractice’ and fraud regarding an allegedly fraudulent real estate investment scheme. The seller represented herself as a realtor and was retained by the purchaser to purchase various Nevada properties under his name and to rent out and manage those properties for his benefit. The alleged realtor forged deeds and transferred legal title of the properties to and from entities she controlled, leaving the purchaser with one of 24 properties for which he has not received his investment money back. According to the evidence shown, multiple questions of material fact must be decided at trial.
Court: USDC Nevada, Judge: Albregts, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: 2:20cv1683, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Fraud, Real Estate, Legal Malpractice