2,408 results for 'nos:"Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights"'.
J. Milazzo grants a preliminary injunction to a 71-year-old widow with a medical condition and sole custody of her 6-year-old granddaughter. The Louisiana Department of Health is ordered to continue paying the woman’s Medicaid health premium while she challenges the state’s termination of her benefit based on its “size of the family” criteria that does not include children or grandchildren. Louisiana stopped paying the grandmother’s monthly Medicaid premium in early April 2024, based on its conclusion she lived in a one-person home, a finding that does not include the child, who is dependent upon her for financial support. Louisiana’s Medicaid manual limits the state’s family size criteria to a household of two - an applicant and an eligible spouse.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Louisiana , Judge: Milazzo, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 2:24cv728, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Government, Health Care, Medicaid
J. Pepper grants the nail salon owner's motion to proceed without prepaying the filing fee in her lawsuit alleging a former friend maliciously slandered her and her business on social media. In part because there is a lack of clarity in the complaint regarding jurisdiction, the owner is given until June 7, 2024, to file an amended complaint. If she does not, her lawsuit will be dismissed.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Wisconsin, Judge: Pepper, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 2:24cv8, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, Defamation
J. Vilardo rules in part for county officials in claims contending an inmate died from acute respiratory failure for lack of proper supervision because evidence did not indicate that anyone other than a single nurse ordered any actions, that the nurse had a prior track record of failing to follow procedure, or that the county trained medical staff at the holding center with deliberate indifference.
Court: USDC Western District of New York, Judge: Vilardo , Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 1:20cv1689, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, Negligence, Wrongful Death
J. Watson dismisses a complaint, filed by the owner of a controversial vanity license plate reading “FCKBLM,” against Honolulu for attempting to revoke the plate. Vanity license plates are a form of government speech that are subject to rules about profanity that are not too vague. Those regulations do not restrict messages based on viewpoint, as the owner suggested, and the letters FCK can be interpreted as an expletive and are not in themselves a protected viewpoint.
Court: USDC Hawaii, Judge: Watson, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 1:22cv407, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Government, First Amendment
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Nye grants in part the Sierra Club's motion for preliminary injunction regarding a city ordinance that prohibits the use of megaphones and gathering in parks. A group of high school and junior high student members of the Sierra Club planned to participate in a Global Climate Strike, including marching to city hall while chanting. The group challenges the megaphone and park gathering restrictions. The Sierra Club has shown that the megaphone restriction has led to self-censorship, and has cited multiple instances when the megaphone restriction was enforced. The park restriction is content-neutral and the Sierra Club has ample alternatives to share its message. The city is enjoined from enforcing the ordinance prohibiting the use of sound amplification devices in the downtown area while this lawsuit is pending.
Court: USDC Idaho, Judge: Nye, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 1:24cv169, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights
J. Lin denies in part summary judgment to an officer seeking qualified immunity regarding excessive force claims from a woman who was bitten by a police dog while hiding, unarmed, in some bushes after stealing from an Ulta Beauty store. The women has abandoned her claim that the initial bite from the dog was excessive, but her claims that the officer allowed the bite to go on for too long will proceed. The woman alleges that the officer allowed the dog to continue biting the top of her scalp after she stated that she would surrender and pleaded for the officer to get the dog off of her.
Court: USDC Northern District of California, Judge: Lin, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv1097, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, Police Misconduct
J. Ellison finds that FBI employees who were required to take regular Covid-19 tests, as part of an accommodation policy for those that requested a religious exemption to vaccine mandates, cannot sue Attorney General Merrick Garland and FBI Director Christopher Wray in their individual and official capacities for violations of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because sovereign immunity prevents the plaintiffs’ claim under the Act, and the defendants’ location in Washington D.C. and their roles enforcing U.S. policy prevent the court from having personal jurisdiction. The suit is dismissed.
Court: USDC Southern District of Texas, Judge: Ellison, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 4:23cv1817, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Equal Protection, Jurisdiction, Employment Discrimination
J. Seabright refuses to dismiss part of a fired employee’s complaint against state deputy attorneys general for informing his Japanese employer about his previous litigation history. One of these attorneys general does not have qualified immunity as there is evidence of the deputy attorney general contacting his former employer. There is also evidence of malice and that she would have known about the employee’s employment contract at the Japanese company. Emotional distress claims are dismissed, however, as the act was not “outrageous.”
Court: USDC Hawaii, Judge: Seabright, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv359, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Government, Interference With Contract, Employment Retaliation
J. Robertson grants the city defendants' motions for summary judgment in this lawsuit arising from a traffic stop that allegedly ended with the driver's arrest. The driver, who was initially stopped for an alleged headlight violation, brings claims for false arrest, excessive force and failure to train. The arresting officer is entitled to qualified immunity, as the evidence does not show excessive force in the use of the handcuffs. The officer was also authorized to arrest the driver after the driver refused to sign the citation.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Oklahoma, Judge: Robertson, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 6:22cv146, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, Immunity
J. Brailsford denies in part a police officer's motion for summary judgment regarding a car passenger's allegations of excessive force, unlawful arrest and unlawful seizure of car following a traffic stop. The passenger's motion for partial summary judgment for unlawful arrest and unlawful seizure of car is granted. The officer does not dispute that he broke the passenger's arm while performing a joint lock technique on her after arresting her husband, the driver. The passenger was charged with resisting or obstructing law enforcement for refusing to vacate the car. The charge was later dismissed. Undisputed facts show that the officer did not have authority to impound the car. The officer arrested the passenger without probable cause. The officer is not entitled to qualified immunity for unlawfully arresting the passenger and issues of material fact exist regarding her claim of excessive force.
Court: USDC Idaho, Judge: Brailsford, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 1:22cv281, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights
J. Hernandez dismisses the parents' claims alleging that the county and its officers instigated an unfounded criminal prosecution of the father for child abuse, and then wrongfully initiated custody proceedings regarding the parents' two children. The parents do not present a constitutional violation.
Court: USDC Oregon, Judge: Hernandez, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv650, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights
J. Dishman dismisses the individual plaintiff's negligence and malicious prosecution claims against the government based on a lack of jurisdiction. The claims arise from an incident at a medical center that allegedly resulted in the plaintiff's arrest. He was later "acquitted of the conduct" and brought the current claims as a result. The conduct alleged against the law enforcement officers does not support a negligent arrest claim, however, and the plaintiff fails to cite "an appropriate private party analogue for his negligent delay of medical care claim." His excessive force claim remains for trial.
Court: USDC Western District of Oklahoma , Judge: Dishman, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 5:19cv1102, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Procedure, Civil Rights, Negligence
J. Chutkan denies a motion to reconsider a determination that a search warrant, which led officers to search a house where the suspect they were seeking did not live, was valid. The court's decision not to grant the searched civilians' request for an adverse inference based on the absence of a report from the database a detective said he searched before seeking the warrant was not "outcome determinative," a school employee's statement to the detective has not been shown to be inadmissible hearsay, a form used to confirm the address was not inadmissible by reason of being unauthenticated, and the searched civilians did not timely raise issues with testimony that another officer conducted a second database search, the admission of which would have been harmless error if it was error at all.
Court: USDC District of Columbia, Judge: Chutkan, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 1:17cv1046, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, Constitution
J. Copenhaver grants the Board of Education's motion to dismiss the elementary school counselor’s suit claiming the Board violated her right to freedom of speech and the West Virginia Whistleblower Act. The counselor alleged the Board and school officials took retaliatory action against her by, among other things, formally reprimanding her and removing her as the coordinator of the standardized test after she expressed concerns to school officials as well as gave an interview to a Charleston television station about the resumption of a national standardized test to occur on school premises in April 2021 during the Covid-19 pandemic. The court finds since her pleading is grounded in her capacity as a public employee and not a private citizen, she has failed to state a claim on which relief can be granted, and the Board's interest in effectively and efficiently administering the standardized test outweigh the counselor's public airing of her concerns.
Court: USDC Southern District of West Virginia, Judge: Copenhaver, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv314, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, Education, Covid-19
J. Reiss denies, in part, a police officer’s motion for summary judgment in this case where he was accused of excessive force and failure to intervene when a physical altercation between a resident and a sergeant happened while the resident was detained inside the police department. She filed claims of assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligence and violations of her Fourth and 14th Amendment rights. There is a dispute of facts as to the officer’s failure to intervene involvement in the sergeant’s takedown, a reasonable jury could find that the alleged use of force was extreme, outrageous and intolerable. The claims regarding the officer’s failure to intervene as to the sergeant shoving and punching the woman are granted.
Court: USDC Vermont, Judge: Reiss, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 2:21cv291, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Negligence, Police Misconduct
J. Aiken dismisses without prejudice the homeowner's complaint that the detective wrongfully arrested him for unlawful possession of heroin and methamphetamine without probable cause. The detective had reason to believe that the homeowner had a usable quantity of heroin because the detective found what he believed was evidence of methamphetamines in the homeowner's bedroom, including used syringes, empty baggies and a piece of foil with a burnt substance.
Court: USDC Oregon, Judge: Aiken, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 6:21cv1648, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, Evidence, Police Misconduct
J. Dick grants a request by the state department of corrections, dismissing on procedural grounds the Title VII complaint of a fired black prison lieutenant, a 20-year veteran. He alleges he was fired for his use of force on an inmate, but a white captain who allegedly committed equal or greater violations of department police in the same incident, got to keep his job. The lieutenant’s claims of racial bias favoring the white captain fail because employees of different rank or status cannot be similarly situated.
Court: USDC Middle District of Louisiana, Judge: Dick, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv897, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Procedure, Employment Discrimination, Employment Retaliation
J. Cummings partially grants an auto body shop’s motion for summary judgment on a former employee’s discrimination claims. The former employee claims she faced discrimination at work on the basis of her pregnancy, and was eventually fired. The court finds the former employee has abandoned her hostile work environment claim, as she did not respond to the auto shop’s argument against it, but allows the rest of her allegations to go forward.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Cummings, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 1:21cv2524, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Employment, Vehicle, Employment Discrimination
J. Hanen finds that evidence does not support an employee’s claims that his prior employer retaliated against him by investigating his conduct after he made complaints about discrimination. There is evidence that the employer initiated the investigation into personal expenditures charged by the employee to the company credit card before the employee made complaints of discrimination so the investigation could not have arisen as a retaliatory action. The employer’s request for summary judgment is granted.
Court: USDC Southern District of Texas, Judge: Hanen, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 4:22cv3454, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, Employment Discrimination
J. Nivison grants in part a behavioral health and education company’s motion for the exclusion of certain expert testimony and the reimbursement of attorney fees after they were sued by the parents of an adult who defendant allegedly failed to provide appropriate care for. The parents’ expert witness designations are adequate but it is inappropriate that counsel attempted to influence the expert testimony.
Court: USDC Maine, Judge: Nivison, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv54, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Experts, Discovery, Attorney Fees