276 results for 'filedAt:"2024-03-27"'.
J. Pickett finds that the trial court properly granted sole custody of the child to the biological mother, who was in a custody dispute with her former partner from a same-sex relationship. The biological mother showed there was a material change in circumstances, and the evidence shows it is in the child's best interest for the biological mother to have sole custody. Affirmed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Pickett, Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: CA-23-548, Categories: Evidence, Family Law
J. Kyzar finds that the trial court improperly granted partial summary judgment and dismissed the family members' wrongful death claims over the death of their father from a heart attack following a rear-end auto accident with a truck. There are issues of material fact as to whether the father's heart attack "was caused by or at least precipitated by the accident and injuries he suffered therefrom." Reversed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Kyzar, Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: CW-23-750, Categories: Tort, Wrongful Death
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Rios reverses, in part, the trial court's grant of partial summary judgment to a worker on his claim the company that provides employer services to the cafeteria where he works is his employer for purposes of his discrimination action. It is unclear whether the worker has shown the existence of an employment relationship that would make the company liable for the actions of covered employees. Reversed in part.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Rios, Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: 04-22-00280-CV , Categories: Employment, Employment Discrimination
J. Aenlle-Rocha finds in favor of Home Depot against the customer's complaint that it sold him Graco Magnum X5 paint sprayer that “sparked” and caught on fire, causing serious burns to the customer's right hand, wrist and forearm. The customer does not provide any admissible evidence of a manufacturing defect about the sprayer. His only expect does not affirmatively state that the sprayer had a manufacturing defect, only that it possibly had one.
Court: USDC Central District of California, Judge: Aenlle-Rocha, Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: 8:20cv2127, NOS: Personal Injury - Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Evidence, Product Liability, Experts
J. Bernal finds in favor of the animal control officers against the animal rescue leader's claim that they issued a search warrant against her and the home owner, falsely accusing the latter two of stealing about 63 German shepherd dogs from an uninhabitable property. The fact that one of the animal control officers omitted how the animal rescue leader communicated with a San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department officer about receiving the 63 dogs does not impact that the animal control officers had probable cause to search the home owner's phone records or that the animal control officers authored a reasonable search warrant.
Court: USDC Central District of California, Judge: Bernal, Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: 5:22cv1600, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights
J. DeGravelles grants a request by foreign and domestic insurers, ordering a stay of a nonprofit condominium owners’ suit for recovery of repairs for wind and hailstorm damage, pending arbitration of claims. The condo owners fail to support their argument the arbitration provision is unenforceable.
Court: USDC Middle District of Louisiana, Judge: DeGravelles, Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv279, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Arbitration, Damages, Contract
J. Greer finds that defendant was improperly sentenced for OWI because the district court relied on unproven information, namely that defendant operated a vehicle with alcohol and cocaine in his system.
Court: Iowa Court Of Appeals, Judge: Greer, Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: 23-1099, Categories: Sentencing, Dui
J. Mendez grants $8,600 in attorney fees and costs to an event distributor following its successful case against a sports bar. The requested $12,000 in fees is reduced based, in part, on a reduction in hourly rates and the elimination of administrative assistant's fees.
Court: USDC Eastern District of California, Judge: Mendez, Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv1059, NOS: Cable/Sat TV - Other Suits, Categories: Communications, Attorney Fees
[Modified.] J. Streeter makes two minor wording changes with no change in judgment. One of nine claims defendant made in his kidnapping, robbery and murder case, which led to a death sentence, is entitled to a certificate of appealability. Reasonable jurists could find that the trial court improperly excused a juror who said she was "neutral" on the death penalty and said she did not want to make a life-or-death decision, but did not say she could not impose the death penalty. Also, the statutory 10-day deadline for granting or denying requests for certificates of appealability is directory, not mandatory. A substantial claim to relief is strong enough for a certificate to issue if jurists could debate whether the trial court erred. And a request must come with a record that is adequate for appellate review.
Court: California Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Streeter, Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: A169146, Categories: Death Penalty, Habeas, Murder
Per curiam, the Northern District of Florida grants judgment to the Secretary of State in a suit alleging that congressional districting maps in North Florida intentionally dilute the votes of voters of color. At a bench trial, the voting-rights groups failed to prove that the Legislature ratified racial animus, whether it existed or not in the map's creation by the Governor, by failing to preserve a majority-Black district in North Florida.
Court: USDC Northern District of Florida, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: 4:22cv109, NOS: State Reapportionment - Other Suits, Categories: Civil Rights, Constitution, Elections
J. Bower finds that the parties' parental rights were properly terminated since they failed to respond to treatment for methamphetamine use and had a history of domestic violence. Affirmed.
Court: Iowa Court Of Appeals, Judge: Bower, Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: 24-0089, Categories: Family Law
J. Buller finds that a father's parental rights were properly terminated since he used methamphetamine while caring for his daughter, who was afraid of him, and became aggressive and violent toward staff while his daughter was removed from him. Affirmed.
Court: Iowa Court Of Appeals, Judge: Buller, Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: 24-0093, Categories: Family Law
J. Tabor finds that a minimum mandatory sentence of life in prison with the possibility of parole in 50 years was properly imposed after defendant pleaded guilty to first-degree murder, which he committed at age 17, as the lower court performed a thorough analysis before handing down sentence. Affirmed.
Court: Iowa Court Of Appeals, Judge: Tabor, Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: 22-2079, Categories: Juvenile Law, Murder, Sentencing
J. Bower finds that a child's guardians were improperly denied termination of the mother's parental rights because the mother had little contact with her child and suffered ongoing substance abuse issues, and she caused the child distress upon spending time with her. Reversed.
Court: Iowa Court Of Appeals, Judge: Bower, Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: 23-0579, Categories: Family Law
[Consolidated.] J. Poochigian finds that the trial court improperly granted anti-SLAPP motions to a group of doctors and hospital staff who were sued by a doctor who claimed they interfered with his right to provide care to his patients after admission to the hospital. The actions by hospital doctors and staff that form the basis of his claims did not involve protected activity. Also, issue preclusion does not apply since an earlier lawsuit dismissed by the doctor did not result in any judicial admissions. Reversed.
Court: California Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Poochigian, Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: F084700, Categories: Anti-slapp, Health Care
J. Wilson finds that the trial court properly sustained the exception of no right of action in the estate's breach of contract claim involving the lack of insurance provided to a doctor who was sued for medical malpractice by the decedent's husband, who won a $2.8 million judgment but has yet to collect on it. The husband has no right of action since he was not a third-party beneficiary to the contract between the doctor and physicians group. Affirmed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Wilson, Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: CA-23-527, Categories: Medical Malpractice, Contract