1,945 results for 'nos:"Employment - Civil Rights"'.
J. Bennett grants the commission’s motion to dismiss this employment dispute brought by a former employee alleging wrongful termination and retaliation after she complained that an external speaker used the word “negro” during a presentation. She claims retaliation in violation of the Maryland Fair Employment Practices Act and Title VII, but fails to plausibly allege she was engaged in a protected activity or an adverse action. The court finds she cannot cure her defects by amending her complaint. Therefore, the clerk shall close this case and it is dismissed with prejudice.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Bennett, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv2492, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, Employment Retaliation
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Hollander grants the university’s motion to dismiss this employment dispute brought by a former Black assistant professor alleging retaliation, race discrimination and hostile work environment claims. Her teaching contract was not renewed after making a complaint to human resources regarding a supervisor directing her to work five days a week, but she could not because of a daycare situation. She fails to include allegations related to the retaliation claims, making it inconsistent with the discrimination claims for the exhaustion requirement.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Hollander, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv2272, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Employment Discrimination, Employment Retaliation
J. Thompson approves a consent decree settling an employment lawsuit alleging unlawful sexual harassment and a hostile work environment based on gender by a former employee against Chipotle. The consent decree governs two Chipotle locations and will be in effect for two years, ensuring compliance and enforcement for a discrimination-free workplace. Chipotle shall pay the employee $50,000 and this case is dismissed with prejudice, but the court retains jurisdiction over this matter for enforcement purposes.
Court: USDC Middle District of Alabama, Judge: Thompson, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv326, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Corporations, Employment, Settlements
J. Rothstein dismisses the job applicant's class action alleging that the furniture company violated Washington law by not posting the wage scale or salary of its job opening. The job applicant fails to state his claim because while intangible injuries like the omission of statutorily required information can be concrete, the job applicant actually alleges a technical violation because the job posting's lack of information does not harm or create a material risk of harm to any single person's concrete interest.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Rothstein, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv1742, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, Employment, Class Action
J. Bumb finds for a law firm in claims contending a paralegal had been treated differently than younger employees and laid off due to a reduction-in-force because evidence indicated the paralegal entered an associate's office and took a file without permission, and that she had worked remotely without permission. Meanwhile, she failed to present evidence of racial discrimination, that she had applied for positions that had been filled by other employees, or that she had been replaced by a younger worker after being laid off.
Court: USDC New Jersey, Judge: Bumb , Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 1:15cv8083, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Employment, Employment Discrimination
J. Oliver grants the employer's motion to dismiss, ruling the employee failed to establish a prima facie case for either disparate treatment or hostile work environment. She did not suffer an adverse employment action, but rather resigned of her own accord. The employee was not demoted or fired, and although she claims her resignation was a constructive discharge, the coworker who harassed her repeatedly was not working for the employer at the time and, therefore, she cannot satisfy pleading requirements.
Court: USDC Connecticut, Judge: Oliver, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv1069, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Employment, Evidence
J. Drozd awards $355,000 in attorney fees and costs to a carhop who won her sexual harassment and discrimination against Sonic. The requested $405,000 in fees is reduced, in part, based on a reduction in certain billed hours.
Court: USDC Eastern District of California, Judge: Drozd, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 2:16cv740, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Employment Discrimination, Attorney Fees
J. Thurston denies, in part, Amazon’s motion to dismiss a former worker’s discrimination action. The worker sufficiently alleges claims for failure to provide a timely, good faith interactive process and unfair business practices.
Court: USDC Eastern District of California, Judge: Thurston, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 1:21cv1804, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Business Practices, Employment Discrimination
J. Rowland partially grants a health care analytics company’s motion for summary judgment on one of its former employees’ discrimination claims. The former employee says the company refused to accommodate her depression, anxiety and Sjögren’s Syndrome, then fired her in retaliation for taking FMLA leave. The court finds the former employee has sufficiently alleged her disability discrimination, failure to accommodate and retaliation claims, but grants the company judgment on her FMLA interference claim. The court also denies the company’s motion for sanctions.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Rowland, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 1:22cv1612, NOS: Amer w/Disabilities-Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Ada / Rehabilitation Act, Employment Discrimination, Employment Retaliation
J. Bennett grants Sherwin-Williams’ motion to compel arbitration and stay of the proceedings in this employment dispute brought by a former paint mixer who alleges race discrimination based on a failure to rehire claim. The paint mixer argues that the arbitration agreement was outside of the scope of his claims and not valid. The court found the arbitration agreement to be valid and enforceable, delegating the threshold issue of arbitrability to the arbitrator.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Bennett, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv3190, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Arbitration, Employment Discrimination, Employment Retaliation
J. Ericksen grants the employer's motion for summary judgment in the former employee's suit alleging discrimination based on race and national origin. A number of the employee's claims are time-barred, and he has not established a prima facie case of discrimination for his claims involving denied overtime opportunities, a suspension and emergency placement and alleged retaliation. He has similarly failed to plead a hostile-work-environment claim.
Court: USDC Minnesota, Judge: Ericksen, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 0:21cv1318, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Employment, Employment Discrimination
J. Parker grants the school system's summary judgment motion in this lawsuit brought by a teacher asserting claims under Title VII and the Tennessee Human Rights Act for discrimination, sexual harassment and retaliation. Certain discrete claims of harassment are time-barred, and her hostile work environment claim is not supported by the allegations.
Court: USDC Western District of Tennessee , Judge: Parker, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv2346, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, Education, Employment Discrimination
J. Lasnik dismisses a lawsuit in which the former chief of inventory management for King County Metro Transit accuses the county of not accommodating her religious exemption to the Covid-19 vaccine mandate, placing her on administrative leave and then firing her. The former chief did not give the county timely notice of a religious conflict, because she makes no attempt to explain how a Covid-19 vaccine injection qualifies as a defilement of God's temple while vaccine injections for other illnesses do not, and she acknowledges that neither injections nor vaccines are forbidden in her belief system.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Lasnik, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv823, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, Employment, Covid-19
J. Hunt partially grants the Chicago Board of Education’s motion to dismiss multiple civil rights claims brought by a former employee. The former employee claims the board fired him in retaliation for prior charges he brought, over the board not accommodating his disabilities. The court mostly dismisses his retaliation and ADA discrimination claims, as he had pulled a girl out of class by her wrist and school officials overheard him speaking unprofessionally about a suicidal student, but allows a portion of his claim under the Illinois Whistleblower Act to proceed.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Hunt, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 1:20cv73, NOS: Amer w/Disabilities-Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Ada / Rehabilitation Act, Whistleblowers, Employment Retaliation