147 results for 'court:"USDC Southern District of Indiana"'.
J. Magnus-Stinson rules in part for law enforcement, business defendants, and prosecutors in civil rights claims. The business defendant, a private corporation, cannot be sued for conspiring to violate plaintiff's civil rights related to a drug arrest, and prosecutors have immunity against claims contending they should have refrained from taking plaintiff to trial. However, malicious prosecution claims specifically based on the fourth amendment may proceed because plaintiff was acquitted of the criminal charges.
Court: USDC Southern District of Indiana, Judge: Magnus-Stinson, Filed On: February 21, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv2303, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, Malicious Prosecution, Immunity
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Pratt finds for patients regarding jurisdiction in privacy and contract claims because the hospital is a private hospital, not a federal actor, and the case concerns managing the patient portal.
Court: USDC Southern District of Indiana, Judge: Pratt, Filed On: February 6, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv1080, NOS: Other Statutory Actions - Other Suits, Categories: Privacy, Venue, Contract
J. Hanlon certifies the class in claims challenging a law that would prohibit physicians from providing gender transition procedures to minors because the proposed class of minors, parents, and medical providers would be affected by the law.
Court: USDC Southern District of Indiana, Judge: Hanlon, Filed On: January 23, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv595, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, Lgbtq, Class Action