41 results for 'cat:"Harassment"'.
J. Foley finds the lower court properly convicted defendant of invasion of privacy for his second violation of a protective order and sentenced him to one year in prison with all but 120 days suspended to probation. While defendant alleges false statements were made regarding probable cause for his original charges, the instant court finds his argument is without merit, and his appellate brief failed to fully develop a legal argument. Affirmed.
Court: Indiana Court Of Appeals, Judge: Foley, Filed On: August 3, 2023, Case #: 23ACR832, Categories: Evidence, Restraining Order, harassment
J. Ayers finds the lower court properly convicted defendant of three counts of aggravated stalking and one count of stalking for multiple incidents of following a woman and her daughters, attempts to enter their home, and threatening them. Evidence is sufficient to support his convictions and effective eight-year sentence as a multiple offender to be served in a local warehouse. Affirmed.
Court: Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals, Judge: Ayers, Filed On: July 31, 2023, Case #: W2022-01204-CCA-R3-CD, Categories: Evidence, harassment
Per curiam, the appellate division finds the trial court improperly convicted defendant of aggravated harassment and family offense. While the victim testified she was bitten on the arm by defendant, she sustained only a bruise without broken skin and there was no evidence of significant pain. Reversed in part.
Court: New York Appellate Divisions, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: July 28, 2023, Case #: KA 21-00198, Categories: Burglary, Theft, harassment
J. Hellman finds the trial court erred in judging defendant, who was convicted of menacing constituting domestic violence and harassment constituting domestic violence, was prohibited from possessing firearms or ammunition because neither crime is a “qualifying misdemeanor.” The state concedes the error. Reversed.
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals, Judge: Hellman, Filed On: July 26, 2023, Case #: A174750, Categories: Firearms, Domestic Violence, harassment
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Christopher finds, on remand from the Court of Criminal Appeals, that the 2017 version of the state's electronic harassment statute is not unconstitutional on its face and that defendant was properly denied habeas relief. Defendant, who was accused of sending harassing text messages to someone, did not show that the statute "implicates the First Amendment." Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Christopher, Filed On: July 25, 2023, Case #: 14-19-01005-CR, Categories: Constitution, Habeas, harassment
J. Bassett supports a finding of delinquency against a juvenile defendant for harassment. Even though the defendant and victim only had one encounter, the defendant repeatedly swore at the victim with the intent to annoy or alarm him and sent him over 22 messages within a four-minute span. Even though the communications were over the course of one in-person interaction, that does not prevent the communications from being considered repeated. Affirmed.
Court: New Hampshire Supreme Court, Judge: Bassett, Filed On: July 13, 2023, Case #: 2021-0560, Categories: Juvenile Law, harassment
J. Bower finds that defendant was properly convicted of harassment because sexual intent was proven by the fact that he posted a video of himself having sex with his ex-girlfriend online, without consent. Affirmed.
Court: Iowa Court Of Appeals, Judge: Bower, Filed On: July 13, 2023, Case #: 22-0903, Categories: Evidence, harassment
J. Christiansen Forster finds that defendant failed to meet her burden to show that the trial court's admission of other-acts evidence resulted in any prejudice in the jury's conclusion that she violated a civil stalking injunction. However, her waiver of counsel at sentencing was not knowingly and intelligently made, as the trial court failed to hold an adequate colloquy. Vacated in part.
Court: Utah Court Of Appeals, Judge: Christiansen Forster, Filed On: June 2, 2023, Case #: 20210335-CA, Categories: Evidence, harassment