1,138 results for 'cat:"Employment" AND cat:"Employment Retaliation"'.
J. Neeley finds the county court properly granted the dept's. plea to the jurisdiction. The female African American former employee filed suit after being denied employment for a position from which she had resigned. She was eventually rehired and filed civil rights charges with the Texas Workforce Commission, alleging she was retaliated against, and that the dept. did not comply with a settlement agreement. The court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because the negligence claim does not fall within the tort claims act's limited waiver of immunity, the state is immune from the claim for breach of the settlement agreement, no prima facie claim for retaliation was stated, and the state is not the employer pursuant to the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Neeley , Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 12-23-00204-CV, Categories: Jurisdiction, employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Neeley finds the county court properly granted the Department of Health and Human Services' plea to the jurisdiction. The black, female former employee filed suit after being denied employment for a position from which she had resigned. She was eventually rehired and filed civil rights charges with the Texas Workforce Commission, alleging she was retaliated against, and that the department did not comply with a settlement agreement. The court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because the negligence claim does not fall within the Texas Tort Claims Act's limited waiver of immunity, the state is immune from the claim for breach of the settlement agreement, no prima facie claim for retaliation was stated and the state is not the employer pursuant to the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Neeley , Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 12-23-00204-CV, Categories: Jurisdiction, employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Leinenweber denies the defendant behavioral therapy provider’s motion to dismiss ADA discrimination claims brought by an autistic former employee. The court finds the former employee has sufficiently alleged that she was demoted, and then pushed to quit, by the company’s unwillingness to accommodate her needs as a person with autism.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Leinenweber, Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv3707, NOS: Amer w/Disabilities - Other - Civil Rights, Categories: Ada / Rehabilitation Act, employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Bennett grants the police department’s motion to dismiss this employment dispute brought by a former Black police officer alleging race discrimination, hostile work environment, retaliation, Monell, and violations of civil rights and the Maryland Fair Employment Practice Act. The police department alleges the employee failed to exhaust her administrative remedies and her complaint is time-barred after an investigation was opened on her for a fight while off-duty. The court finds her EEOC charge was filed in timely manner, her Title VII claims appear to be time-barred. Her complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, but she has 15 days to file an amended complaint.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Bennett, Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv2215, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Kness partially grants the Illinois Department of Corrections’ motion for summary judgment on an older Black employee’s claims of age and race discrimination, and retaliation for union association. The employee, who oversees several parole officers, claims his spotty disciplinary record with the department is the result of systemic ageism and anti-Black racism and departmental retaliation for his efforts to unionize his office. The court finds most of the employee’s discrimination claims either untimely or lacking sufficient evidence, but also finds there is sufficient evidence to support his claim for union activity retaliation against several specific department personnel.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Kness, Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 1:18cv282, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation, Labor / Unions
J. Quereshi denies, in part, the United States Department of Treasury and a supervisor in this employment dispute brought by a former employee claiming national origin discrimination, retaliation, hostile work environment and constructive discharge. She alleges numerous times she was assigned more work than other coworkers, ignored, criticized, insulted by her supervisors and not selected for promotions before her forced retirement. The employee is granted leave to file an amended complaint with the appropriate details of her discrimination, hostile work environment and constructive discharge claims.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Quereshi, Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 8:23cv1699, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Rabner finds that the appellate division improperly held that a police officer violated the non-disparagement clause in her settlement with the township by stating in a television news interview that she had been abused for eight years and discussing allegedly retaliatory disciplinary charges because the non-disparagement clause would bar speech protected under state anti-discrimination laws, and thus was not enforceable. Further, "survivors of discrimination and harassment have the right to speak about their experiences in any number of ways, and they can no longer be restrained by confidentiality provisions in employment contracts or settlement agreements." Reversed in part.
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court, Judge: Rabner , Filed On: May 7, 2024, Case #: A-2-23, Categories: employment, Defamation, employment Retaliation
J. Moon grants the city's motion for summary judgment in an employment discrimination suit. A female firefighter sued the city, claiming she experienced discriminatory treatment from her superiors and that her superiors opened a retaliatory investigation into her conduct, resulting in her demotion. There is no evidence of her employers treating male coworkers differently; they, too, are required to provide a doctor's note if taking sick leave, and there is no evidence of them making statements about women not belonging in the fire service. A feeling of disrespect is not a substitute for evidence of discriminatory treatment.
Court: USDC Western District of Virginia, Judge: Moon, Filed On: May 7, 2024, Case #: 6:23cv32, Categories: employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Sessions denies a construction and excavation business, and its board members motion to dismiss in this Fair Labor Standards Act dispute brought by the Department of Labor alleging unlawful retaliation against employees that received back wages from a settlement. The employees alleges that the board members made false and retaliatory statements on the social media platform Facebook. The DoL plausibly alleged the conduct was a retaliation threat based on coercion making it plausibly unprotected. Discovery may proceed and the Labor Department’s motion to amend is also denied.
Court: USDC Vermont, Judge: Sessions, Filed On: May 7, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv560, NOS: Fair Labor Standards Act - Labor, Categories: employment Retaliation, Labor
J. Newman grants the police department's motion for summary judgment, ruling the police officer's age discrimination claim fails. The younger officer used as a comparator did not commit the same type of misconduct and, therefore, is not similarly situated, while a supervisor's single comment about "younger officers" during disciplinary proceedings does not constitute direct evidence of discrimination. Meanwhile, the retaliation claim also fails as a matter of law because the fitness for duty evaluation required before the officer could return to work was not an "adverse employment action," especially considering the officer blamed several mistakes that led to his suspension on the stress of his job.
Court: USDC Southern District of Ohio, Judge: Newman, Filed On: May 7, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv96, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Richardson grants the defendant company’s motion for summary judgment in this case brought by a former employee asserting certain state-law employment related claims, including retaliatory discharge under the Tennessee Workers’ Compensation Law and discriminatory discharge under the Tennessee Disability Act. As to the former employee’s two claims, which both stem from his termination, the court concludes that there are no issues of fact and that the employer is “entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
Court: USDC Middle District of Tennessee , Judge: Richardson, Filed On: May 7, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv87, NOS: Other Labor Litigation - Labor, Categories: employment, employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Chun declines to dismiss the school faculty member's retaliation claim in his complaint alleging that the university president wrongfully fired the faculty member for putting a statement in his class syllabus, emails and outside his faculty office door about the Coast Salish tribe's claim to land that read, "I acknowledge that by the labor theory of property the Coast Salish people can claim historical ownership of almost none of the land currently occupied by the University of Washington." The school faculty member plausibly alleges a First Amendment retaliation claim as his speech “related to scholarship or teaching." While the university and its president cite the "Johnson v. Poway Unified School District" decision that allows discipline of speech on school grounds, that case's analysis focuses on secondary school education, not college education.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Chun, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv964, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Education, employment Retaliation, First Amendment
J. Garcia denies all parties' motions for summary judgment, ruling the bus drivers' cited evidence fails to establish all necessary elements for their retaliation and discrimination claims and, therefore, precludes judgment in their favor. Meanwhile, the drivers' claims regarding the employer's failure to properly sanitize buses or use hypoallergenic sanitizers in the wake of Covid-19 are not preempted by the National Transit Systems Security Act because the complaint filed with OSHA before this suit was filed was dismissed by the agency.
Court: USDC Connecticut, Judge: Garcia, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv217, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Evidence, Preemption, employment Retaliation
J. AliKhan largely grants the employer's motion for summary judgment and denies the employee's cross-motion for partial summary judgment in her suit alleging that the employer failed to accommodate her disabilities and cut her hours and threatened to terminate her for taking medical leave. Summary judgment is denied to the employer as to claims related to failures to provide an ergonomic chair and desk and related to the employer's requirement that the employee recertify her FMLA leave. It is otherwise granted.
Court: USDC District of Columbia, Judge: AliKhan, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: 1:19cv1766, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: employment, employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Saylor denies in part several funds and their chairman’s motion for summary judgment against their former administrator who is being sued for breach of fiduciary duty and has asserted counterclaims for sexual harassment, creating a hostile work environment, retaliation for reporting harassment and failure to accommodate her Type 1 diabetes. The chairman repeatedly behaved inappropriately and made sexual comments to the administrator, such as telling her that he wanted her and had a crush on her and that his wife wasn’t taking care of him, attempting to kiss her against her will immediately after screaming and swearing at her after she gave told him his behavior made her uncomfortable, and if the breasts of an employee on medical leave for breast cancer were “any good.”
Court: USDC Massachusetts, Judge: Saylor, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: 1:21cv10163, NOS: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) - Labor, Categories: employment, employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Robbenhaar grants the city's motion for summary judgment, ruling that because the contract and due process claims brought by the police officer are identical to the ones litigated in disciplinary and administrative proceedings immediately after his termination, they are barred by res judicata.
Court: USDC New Mexico, Judge: Robbenhaar, Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: 1:21cv1113, NOS: Labor/Management Relations - Labor, Categories: Civil Procedure, Government, employment Retaliation
J. Fischer finds that the lower court properly declined to set aside a default judgment against the employer in a case filed by a worker alleging he was discriminated against for filing a workers' compensation claim following a fall that injured his back. The employer failed to prove good cause for its default and defaulted claims asserting the court wrongly awarded punitive damages. Affirmed.
Court: Missouri Supreme Court, Judge: Fischer, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: SC100193, Categories: employment Retaliation, Workers' Compensation
J. Bennett grants the commission’s motion to dismiss this employment dispute brought by a former employee alleging wrongful termination and retaliation after she complained that an external speaker used the word “negro” during a presentation. She claims retaliation in violation of the Maryland Fair Employment Practices Act and Title VII, but fails to plausibly allege she was engaged in a protected activity or an adverse action. The court finds she cannot cure her defects by amending her complaint. Therefore, the clerk shall close this case and it is dismissed with prejudice.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Bennett, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv2492, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, employment Retaliation
J. Hollander grants the university’s motion to dismiss this employment dispute brought by a former Black assistant professor alleging retaliation, race discrimination and hostile work environment claims. Her teaching contract was not renewed after making a complaint to human resources regarding a supervisor directing her to work five days a week, but she could not because of a daycare situation. She fails to include allegations related to the retaliation claims, making it inconsistent with the discrimination claims for the exhaustion requirement.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Hollander, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv2272, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation