426 results for 'nos:"Patent - Property Rights"'.
J. Wu strikes the printing services company’s untimely reasonable royalty theory and belated disclosures related to its lawsuit, as it sought a declaration that the printing services company and the inventor did not infringe on a patent entitled “Metal Child Resistant Container.” The printing services company raised the issue of non-infringement, but it did not cite any specific documents it produced that were relevant to non-infringing alternatives.
Court: USDC Central District of California, Judge: Wu, Filed On: May 23, 2023, Case #: 2:20cv6177, NOS: Patent - Property Rights, Categories: Evidence, Patent, Discovery
J. Chun denies the fabless semiconductor company's renewed motion for summary judgment as to the '092 patent, which describes "techniques for communicating between a 'communication station' (reader) and an RFID 'data carrier'," for the global semiconductor's patent lawsuit. The fabless semiconductor company asserts that the '092 patent's Electronic Product Code (EPC) is not an "identification data block" because it is not needed to uniquely identify the tag during "an inventorization-like procedure," but even if it was not, the EPC is still useful data which would satisfy elements of the claim.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Chun, Filed On: May 19, 2023, Case #: 2:20cv1503, NOS: Patent - Property Rights, Categories: Patent
J. Davila grants partial summary judgment to Samsung Electronics in its lawsuit against Blaze Media over several mobile device patents. The NFC security patents, which relate to security improvements in NFC enabled mobile devices and NFC point-of-sale terminals, do not recite an inventive concept and are thus patent-ineligible. However, Blaze Media plausibly alleges that the mobile payment patents, which are related to security processing product purchase transactions made by mobile devices, recite an inventive concept.
Court: USDC Northern District of California, Judge: Davila, Filed On: May 16, 2023, Case #: 5:21cv2989, NOS: Patent - Property Rights, Categories: Patent
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Gorton transfers three pharmaceutical companies' action seeking a declaration they are not infringing on another company's vaccine-related patents to the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. There is no proof the pharmaceutical companies filed their claims in bad faith, and the Eastern District of Virginia has personal jurisdiction.
Court: USDC Massachusetts, Judge: Gorton, Filed On: May 16, 2023, Case #: 1:22cv11202, NOS: Patent - Property Rights, Categories: Patent, Jurisdiction