335 results for 'cat:"Evidence" AND cat:"Sex Offender"'.
J. Hixson finds the trial court properly convicted defendant for the sexual assault of his 12-year-old daughter. A detective testified to interviewing the mother and daughter on allegations of the father's committing sexual assault. Sufficient evidence, including forensic interview and statements made by defendant involving keeping secrets supports the conviction. Defendant's challenge of evidence sufficiency is not preserved for review, and the trial court properly denied his request for directed verdict. The victim testified her father touched her "private area," which can be construed as having been done for sexual gratification. Affirmed.
Court: Arkansas Court Of Appeals, Judge: Hixson , Filed On: May 15, 2024, Case #: CR-23-611, Categories: evidence, sex Offender, Child Victims
J. Stabile finds that the lower court properly sentenced defendant to 15 to 30 years in prison for raping and sexually assaulting his two minor daughters. The court’s admission of one of the daughter’s out-of-court statements about how defendant bribed her sister to undress in a basement was appropriate. Affirmed.
Court: Pennsylvania Superior Court, Judge: Stabile, Filed On: May 13, 2024, Case #: J-S06013-23, Categories: evidence, Sentencing, sex Offender
J. Byrne finds the trial court properly admitted statements made by the victims to a social worker about defendant's sexual abuse. All of the statements were made for the purposes of a medical diagnosis and treatment. Meanwhile, the testimony from the social worker, when combined with the victim's testimony, was sufficient to establish all elements of the rape offenses and for the jury to convict defendant. Affirmed.
Court: Ohio Court Of Appeals, Judge: Byrne, Filed On: May 13, 2024, Case #: 2024-Ohio-1834, Categories: evidence, sex Offender
J. Webb finds the trial court properly convicted defendant for murder, rape and abuse of a corpse. The suffocated victim was found wrapped in a bedspread on the side of the road with injuries indicating the victim had been beaten and sexually assaulted. An investigation revealed the victim had been in a relationship with defendant, leading to a warrant to search the home where signs of a struggle and blood spatter were found, along with pillow shams matching the bedspread in which the victim was wrapped. Defendant's DNA found on a cigarette butt near the victim's body, as well as the victim's DNA found in the trunk of defendant's vehicle support the conviction. Affirmed.
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court, Judge: Webb , Filed On: May 9, 2024, Case #: CR-23-745, Categories: evidence, Murder, sex Offender
J. Thyer finds the trial court properly convicted defendant for sexual assault. Defendant's charge of rape against his 9-year-old daughter was reduced to second-degree sexual assault on the victim's testimony that she was petting her dog after a bad dream when defendant entered the room, pulled her off the bed and put his penis between her "butt cheeks." The mother witnessed the assault, and friends and other family were told about it before police were called. The testimony does not need to be corroborated and sufficient evidence supports the conviction. Affirmed.
Court: Arkansas Court Of Appeals, Judge: Thyer , Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: CR-23-410, Categories: evidence, sex Offender, Child Victims
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Johnson finds that defendant was properly convicted of first degree rape of a juvenile under the age of 13. The victim testified that defendant, his mother's ex-boyfriend, sexually abused him when he was seven or eight years old, and that the abuse occurred when his mother was at work. Further, defendant did not challenge the state's intent to call a nurse as an expert to specifically address the issues of “general child sexual abuse, specifically addressing issues of delayed disclosure and the affect sexual abuse may have on children concerning delayed and partial disclosure." Affirmed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Johnson , Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 23-KA-375, Categories: evidence, sex Offender, Experts
J. Welch finds the trial court properly convicted defendant, a psychiatrist, for third-degree sexual assault. The victims - his patients - testified to inappropriate touching, groping and kissing, with certain testimony corroborating other testimony. Evidence in a presentence report is not subject to admissibility standards used at trial and the court’s review of the report would not make a reasonable person question the judge’s impartiality. The motion to recuse is without merit and counsel cannot be found ineffective for failing to make a meritless argument. Affirmed.
Court: Nebraska Court Of Appeals, Judge: Welch , Filed On: May 7, 2024, Case #: A-23-577, Categories: evidence, Judiciary, sex Offender
J. Hardin-Tammons finds that the lower court properly denied defendant's motion for post-conviction relief alleging his counsel was ineffective for failing to call an independent DNA expert and an independent pharmacological expert. In light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilty, he cannot show he suffered any prejudice as a result of counsel's alleged failures. Further, defendant's proposed pharmacological testimony about the consequences of mixing Paxil and alcohol would not have provided defendant with a viable defense. Affirmed.
Court: Missouri Court Of Appeals, Judge: Hardin-Tammons, Filed On: May 7, 2024, Case #: ED111372, Categories: Dna, evidence, sex Offender
J. Boomgaarden finds that the lower court properly convicted defendant of sexual abuse and other sex crimes against a minor. Defendant claims there was not enough evidence entered on the record to convict him, but the state brought forward witnesses and other exhibits that all supported a jury being able to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that he acted knowingly and with intent. Affirmed.
Court: Wyoming Supreme Court, Judge: Boomgaarden, Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: S-23-0268, Categories: evidence, sex Offender, Child Victims
J. Wise finds the lack of physical evidence against defendant did not prevent the jury from finding him guilty of rape. The victim's uncontroverted testimony established all elements of the offense and was not contradicted by any of the testimony provided by her mother or defendant's daughter. Meanwhile, the mention of defendant's previous prison time by his daughter did not deprive him of a fair trial because the testimony was elicited by his own attorney during cross-examination and, in any case, was stricken from the record by the trial court. Affirmed.
Court: Ohio Court Of Appeals, Judge: Wise, Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: 2024-Ohio-1717, Categories: evidence, Fair Trial, sex Offender
J. Hudson finds the trial court properly convicted defendant for child sexual abuse and rape, sentencing him to 25 years in prison. Nothing in defendant's confession video suggests coercion or involuntariness, and he fails to show the court's decision to allow it into evidence was erroneous. All evidence supports the conviction and nothing in the record suggests the judge considered extraneous allegation when sentencing. Affirmed.
Court: Oklahoma Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Hudson , Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: F-2022-620, Categories: evidence, sex Offender, Child Victims
J. Connors finds that the lower court improperly convicted defendant on two of the sexual offenses but properly convicted him on the other. At issue is whether the evidence sufficiently established the age of the victim. The court concludes that the evidence proves the victim was under the age of 14 but not under the age of 12. Accordingly, the convictions on the Class A and B offenses are vacated, and the matter is remanded for resentencing as to the Class C offense of unlawful sexual contact. Vacated in part.
Court: Maine Supreme Court, Judge: Connors, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 2024ME31, Categories: evidence, Sentencing, sex Offender
J. Rivera finds that the appellate division improperly convicted Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein of sex crimes based on uncharged prior bad acts not germane to the case because cross-examining Weinstein about those allegations threatened to portray him in a highly prejudicial light, and a new trial should be held since both errors deprived him of a fair trial. Meanwhile, the court properly held that rape charges were not time-barred because the statute of limitations had been tolled for time during which Weinstein was continuously out-of-state. Reversed in part.
Court: New York Court Of Appeals, Judge: Rivera, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 24, Categories: evidence, Fair Trial, sex Offender
J. Powers finds that the lower court properly classified defendant as a risk level two sex offender after adding "points" to his assessment for sex crimes committed against a stranger when he grabbed the victim's buttocks and masturbated in front of her at a bus stop. Without direct evidence that defendant knew the victim, the inference that they were not acquainted was reasonable. Affirmed.
Court: New York Appellate Divisions, Judge: Powers, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: CV-23-1315, Categories: evidence, Sentencing, sex Offender
J. Mackey finds that the lower court properly classified defendant as a risk level two sex offender with a sexually violent offender designation. Defendant contends sworn statements from his then-13-year-old victim contained discrepancies concerning allegations that he used forcible compulsion and engaged in sexual intercourse with her, but the girl subsequently divulged other sexual abuse committed by defendant while she was in therapy.
Court: New York Appellate Divisions, Judge: Mackey, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 533009, Categories: evidence, sex Offender
J. Van Cleef uphold the trial court’s judgment of a life sentence for aggravated sexual assault and family violence “occlusion,” which requires enhanced penalties under Texas law for choking the victim, a mother of three young children. The trial court properly allowed the victim to testify about the defendant’s prior conviction and allowed a state witness to testify about the victim’s truthfulness. Furthermore, the conviction is supported by sufficient evidence, including the victim's detailed testimony that defendant would force her to brush his teeth and bathe him after he raped and sodomized. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Judge: Van Cleef, Filed On: April 24, 2024, Case #: 06-23-00128-CR , Categories: evidence, Ineffective Assistance, sex Offender
J. Hess finds that despite the lack of physical evidence, defendant's rape convictions were not against the weight of the evidence. The victim's testimony about several instances of both oral and vaginal sex, some of which included defendant choking her, established all the elements of the offenses and proved his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Affirmed.
Court: Ohio Court Of Appeals, Judge: Hess, Filed On: April 24, 2024, Case #: 2024-Ohio-1640, Categories: evidence, sex Offender
J. Dowd finds that the lower court properly convicted defendant of rape of a 17-year-old victim, and sentenced him to seven years in prison. The court did not err by allowing the victim to testify she felt intimidated at her deposition after defendant impeached her with her deposition testimony. Further, the prosecutor was permitted to highlight the age difference between defendant and the victim during closing arguments. Affirmed.
Court: Missouri Court Of Appeals, Judge: Dowd, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: ED111691, Categories: evidence, sex Offender, Child Victims
J. Pirtle finds the trial court properly dismissed defendant's petition for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The 9-year-old victim reported defendant had sexually abused her when she was 3 or 4 years old, saying her mother made her available to defendant in exchange for drugs. Though information shared by the victim over several forensic interviews was not entirely consistent, defendant was not prejudiced by his counsel's not interviewing a previous forensic interviewer or another individual the victim had mistaken for defendant. The information would have been cumulative. Affirmed.
Court: Nebraska Court Of Appeals, Judge: Pirtle, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: A-23-230, Categories: evidence, sex Offender, Child Victims
J. Ebel finds that the lower court properly convicted defendant of sexual abuse against a minor. Defendant claims on appeal that the lower court improperly allowed a 50-minute video recording of a forensic interview with the child victim, which defendant says violated the rules regarding hearsay. The interview in question, however, was supported by "sufficient guarantees of trustworthiness" and had enough value to the proceedings to outweigh any evidence-related issues. Affirmed.
Court: 10th Circuit, Judge: Ebel, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 22-7033, Categories: evidence, sex Offender, Child Victims
J. Smith finds the witnesses' close relationships to the victim and minor variations in their testimony does not render defendant's sexual imposition conviction against the weight of the evidence. The testimony established all elements of the offense, while the jury was in the best position to determine the witnesses' credibility. Meanwhile, because defendant's girlfriend was not present at the time of the assault, his attorney's failure to call the woman as a witness did not constitute ineffective assistance, as her testimony would not have included any relevant evidence. Affirmed.
Court: Ohio Court Of Appeals, Judge: Smith, Filed On: April 22, 2024, Case #: 2024-Ohio-1678, Categories: evidence, Ineffective Assistance, sex Offender
J. Welch finds that defendant was properly convicted of molestation of a juvenile, sexual battery and other charges relating to incidents involving his stepdaughter. The testimony of the victim and defendant's statement to police was sufficient evidence that he committed the offenses. Affirmed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Welch, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 2023KA0993, Categories: evidence, sex Offender
J. Alley finds a lower court erred in granting a defendant’s motion to suppress his confession to sexually abusing his daughter. While defendant referenced that he would get a lawyer while being questioned by detectives, he continued to speak to them regardless, and as he “was not in custody and was free to terminate the interrogation,” his confession should not have been suppressed. Reversed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Alley, Filed On: April 18, 2024, Case #: 08-23-00077-CR, Categories: evidence, sex Offender, Child Victims
J. Hixson finds the trial court properly convicted defendant for sexual assault and introducing benzodiazepine into the victim's body. Defendant's ex-wife testified that defendant was watching their children at her home while she worked. She returned home to find her 16-year-old niece, who was not expected to be there, asleep. She said defendant was acting erratically, and that she discovered a plastic bag containing drugs. After defendant left, the niece disclosed the assault, later testing positive for the drug. Substantial evidence supports the conviction. An exception cited by defendant is not applicable to prosecutorial errors involving closing discussion of evidence not presented at trial. No ineffective assistance or court error is found. Affirmed.
Court: Arkansas Court Of Appeals, Judge: Hixson , Filed On: April 17, 2024, Case #: CR-23-684, Categories: Drug Offender, evidence, sex Offender
J. Moore finds that although defendant was involved with his girlfriend in the scheme whereby she traded sexual favors for painkillers and used some of the drugs "purchased" through the setup, there was sufficient evidence to convict him of sex trafficking through force or coercion. The dealer routinely assaulted the victim and threatened her with guns on several occasions. Meanwhile, the trial court properly applied a "vulnerable victim" enhancement to defendant's sentence because his girlfriend's addiction to opioids and physical ailments placed her squarely in the category. Affirmed.
Court: 6th Circuit, Judge: Moore, Filed On: April 17, 2024, Case #: 23-3179, Categories: evidence, Sentencing, sex Offender