161 results for 'filedAt:"2024-03-19"'.
J. Bishop finds the county court properly divided the unmarried couple's shared assets and debts. Though one party was required to pay the other $150,000 within 90 days and did not, the signed agreement includes the stipulation the payment be made upon the other's completion of the transfer of real estate and business asset interests, whichever is later. All aspects of the agreement were met and the party's motion for a finding of contempt is denied. Affirmed.
Court: Nebraska Court Of Appeals, Judge: Bishop , Filed On: March 19, 2024, Case #: A-23-160, Categories: Contempt, Property, Contract
J. Knapp denies, in part, the competitor's motion to compel discovery, ruling its requests for "all literature or other materials" related both to the patentholder's crossbows and any of its confidentiality agreements with third parties are overly broad and would pose an undue burden on the company.
Court: USDC Northern District of Ohio, Judge: Knapp, Filed On: March 19, 2024, Case #: 5:23cv598, NOS: Patent - Property Rights, Categories: Patent, Discovery
J. Dick orders a Louisiana corrections officer to pay $12,500 in attorney fees to a state prisoner who was burned and stabbed by another inmate as the guard watched “and did nothing.” The inmate was awarded $10,000 in compensatory damages following a bench trial, and is entitled to the maximum under the Prison Litigation Reform Act.
Court: USDC Middle District of Louisiana, Judge: Dick, Filed On: March 19, 2024, Case #: 3:19cv29, NOS: Prison Condition - Habeas Corpus, Categories: Evidence, Damages, Police Misconduct
J. Cartwright denies the video game developer's summary judgment against the video game company's unjust enrichment claim in his complaint alleging that the company refused to pay the developer royalties for the game "7 Days to Die." The unjust enrichment claim currently survives summary judgment, though the developer can address the summary judgment standard since the company clarifies the legal theory underlying its second counterclaim. Both parties are to submit a supplemental brief addressing if the video company presented enough evidence for unjust enrichment.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Cartwright, Filed On: March 19, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv5718, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Contract
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Wilson finds that the appellate division improperly rejected a third request to amend a complaint to cure a shortcoming that led to dismissal in an earlier appeal. Since requests to amend are generally granted, no abuse of discretion occurred in authorizing one, even on appellate division dismissal, because the lower court retained the power to allow amendment to cure the defect found on appeal. Reversed.
Court: New York Court Of Appeals, Judge: Wilson, Filed On: March 19, 2024, Case #: 17, Categories: Civil Procedure
J. Mosman denies the pharmaceutical trade group summary judgment for the commerce clause claim of its complaint alleging that Andrew Stolfi, Director of the Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services, allowed disclosure laws that unfairly require pharmaceutical manufacturers to hand over trade secrets and threaten to publicize that information if the manufacturers decide to increase their prices. Neither party is entitled to summary judgment on the commerce clause, because neither party can definitely say how House Bill 4005, which is a law providing for “drug-pricing transparency," will effect interstate commerce.
Court: USDC Oregon, Judge: Mosman, Filed On: March 19, 2024, Case #: 6:19cv1996, NOS: Constitutionality of State Statutes - Other Suits, Categories: Civil Rights, Commerce, Government
J. Moon grants the employee's motion for summary judgment. The employee initially stopped working after an extreme case of hyperthyroidism before his doctor said he was fit to go back to work. The hyperthyroidism caused cognitive decline to the point that he cannot perform simple tasks, remember what he is saying midsentence, or count. He successfully argued that his insurance company wrongly denied him long-term disability benefits for his cognitive issues. The insurance company never gave the independent reviewers hired to determine his disability status crucial affidavits submitted by him, his wife, his mother-in-law, and friends attesting to instances where his impaired cognition manifested.
Court: USDC Western District of Virginia, Judge: Moon, Filed On: March 19, 2024, Case #: 6:2cv6, NOS: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) - Labor, Categories: Erisa, Insurance, Labor