144 results for 'filedAt:"2024-04-26"'.
J. Standridge finds a lower court properly convicted and sentenced a defendant for first- degree felony murder, aggravated kidnapping, and aggravated battery. The defendant, who serves a hard 25 life sentence and consecutive 13 months in prison, argued that the lower court erred in allowing the State to submit alternative means of aggravated kidnapping, and that evidence of was insufficient to support his conviction. However, the State presented sufficient evidence in court that "taking or confining" does not support alternative means of kidnapping or aggravated kidnapping. Affirmed.
Court: Kansas Supreme Court, Judge: Standridge, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 125685, Categories: Murder, Sentencing, Kidnapping
Per curiam, the court of civil appeals finds that the lower court properly determined the child to be dependent and awarded sole custody to the maternal grandparents. The father contends that the lower court erred by "finding the child dependent as to him." However, the record shows that the mother abandoned the child by relinquishing her rights to the grandparents, meaning the dependency ruling was appropriate. Also, there was no abuse of discretion with the custodial ruling. Affirmed.
Court: Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: CL-2023-0616, Categories: Evidence, Family Law
J. Reiss denies, in part, a police officer’s motion for summary judgment in this case where he was accused of excessive force and failure to intervene when a physical altercation between a resident and a sergeant happened while the resident was detained inside the police department. She filed claims of assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligence and violations of her Fourth and 14th Amendment rights. There is a dispute of facts as to the officer’s failure to intervene involvement in the sergeant’s takedown, a reasonable jury could find that the alleged use of force was extreme, outrageous and intolerable. The claims regarding the officer’s failure to intervene as to the sergeant shoving and punching the woman are granted.
Court: USDC Vermont, Judge: Reiss, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 2:21cv291, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Negligence, Police Misconduct
J. Wood partially rules in favor of the employee and the executive in a breach of contract and fiduciary duty action brought by the insurance brokerage firm for violating their employment agreements. The employee's motion for summary judgment is granted as to the firm's claims for breach of non-compete covenant and breach of confidentiality and non-disclosure covenants regarding all clients except one. However, the employee's motion is denied with respect to claims for breach of fiduciary duty, breach of non-solicitation, employee non-interference and confidentiality covenants for information on one client. Genuine issues of fact exist as to whether the employee breached his non-solicitation covenant but undisputed evidence shows that the executive did not breach hers. There is a factual dispute as to whether the executive violated her confidentiality and non-disclosure covenants.
Court: USDC Southern District of Georgia, Judge: Wood, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 4:23cv54, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Employment, Fiduciary Duty, Contract
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Pyle finds that the trial court properly found for prison employees in a prisoner's civil rights claims contending an employee was loud, disruptive, and disrespectful. Meanwhile, the prisoner was properly temporarily removed from employment in the law library since the prisoner's comments on the restroom policy did not constitute speech protected under the first amendment. Affirmed.
Court: Indiana Court Of Appeals, Judge: Pyle, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 23A-CT-201, Categories: Civil Rights, Constitution, Prisoners' Rights
J. AliKhan grants summary judgment to the FBI in the information seekers' Freedom of Information Act suit related to the 2012 attacks on the U.S. Embassy in Benghazi, Libya. The FBI has adequately established that withheld records are part of an ongoing investigation of the attacks, and existing public accounts of the attacks do not undermine the agency's concerns about interference with that investigation.
Court: USDC District of Columbia, Judge: AliKhan, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 1:14cv1589, NOS: Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) - Other Suits, Categories: Administrative Law, Public Record, Agency
J. Traver finds the trial court improperly denied the tenants’ motion to reconsider and entered a final judgment in favor of the landlord in this eviction lawsuit. The tenants argue the total amount of rent due was wrong and they were entitled to a hearing on their motion to reconsider. The judgment of eviction is vacated and remanded to determine the correct amount of rent due. Reversed.
Court: Florida Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Traver, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 6D23-2223, Categories: Civil Procedure, Landlord Tenant, Damages
J. St. Eve finds that the lower court properly convicted singer R. Kelly of sexually abusing underage girls, and of child pornography for videotaping his sex acts with his victims. Under current law, there is no statute of limitations for sex crimes against children. Although R. Kelly's abuse of his victims took place in the 1990s and 2000s, he is not entitled to the application of an earlier version of the statute with a shorter limitations period. The PROTECT Act of 2003 unambiguously applies retroactively to R. Kelly's crimes. Affirmed.
Court: 7th Circuit, Judge: St. Eve, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 23-1449, Categories: Criminal Procedure, Sex Offender, Child Victims
J. Prescott grants the majority owner's motion to dismiss the appeal filed by the minority owners, ruling his motion to confirm an arbitration award was not stayed upon the filing of this appeal.That motion was separate from the underlying civil complaint and did not seek to "enforce or carry out a judgment," as required under the rules of civil procedure.
Court: Connecticut Court Of Appeals, Judge: Prescott, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: AC56348, Categories: Arbitration, Civil Procedure, Fiduciary Duty
[Consolidated.] J. Moll finds the lower court erroneously sustained the adjacent property owner's appeal of the township's approval of a subdivision redevelopment without an environmental impact assessment. The relevant zoning procedures require only a developer submit a request for such an assessment, not that one be completed. The assessment company failed to complete the assessment as it was developing new procedures, and because the zoning laws allow the zoning commission to act without a submitted assessment, it was not improper to approve the redevelopment project. Reversed in part.
Court: Connecticut Court Of Appeals, Judge: Moll, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: AC46146, Categories: Environment, Property, Zoning
J. Elgo finds that while the Connecticut Supreme Court's decision in a prior case changed the implications of due process claims regarding in-court identifications, the lower court properly dismissed the inmate's habeas claim for ineffective assistance because the prior ruling did not apply retroactively and, therefore, his attorney could not raise the issue on appeal. Affirmed.
Court: Connecticut Court Of Appeals, Judge: Elgo, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: AC46059, Categories: Habeas, Due Process, Identification
J. Westbrook finds the lower court erroneously denied a portion of the hospital's motion to dismiss because claims made in relation to its disclosure of the patient's private medical records at his trial on a drunk driving charge were covered by litigation privilege. However, the lower court properly denied the motion to dismiss in relation to claims brought for information disclosed to the prosecution prior to trial. The hospital failed to provide any evidence to dispute the patient's claim that information in excess of that compelled through a subpoena was disclosed. Affirmed in part.
Court: Connecticut Court Of Appeals, Judge: Westbrook, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: AC46339, Categories: Evidence, Privacy, Privilege
J. Aiken dismisses without prejudice the homeowner's complaint that the detective wrongfully arrested him for unlawful possession of heroin and methamphetamine without probable cause. The detective had reason to believe that the homeowner had a usable quantity of heroin because the detective found what he believed was evidence of methamphetamines in the homeowner's bedroom, including used syringes, empty baggies and a piece of foil with a burnt substance.
Court: USDC Oregon, Judge: Aiken, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 6:21cv1648, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, Evidence, Police Misconduct
J. Welbaum finds legislation to legalize recreational marijuana and allow individuals to cultivate marijuana plants at their homes did not de-criminalize conduct that occurred before it was put into effect and, in any case, defendant's conviction for possession of several plants was based on plants visible from the outside of his home, conduct still prohibited under the new laws. Meanwhile, defendant's consent to allow police to search his home negates any claim for ineffective assistance of counsel because a motion to suppress the results of the search would have been unsuccessful. Affirmed.
Court: Ohio Court Of Appeals, Judge: Welbaum, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 2024-Ohio-1609, Categories: Drug Offender, Ineffective Assistance, Search
[Consolidated.] J. Duhart finds the trial court properly struck portions of an expert witness's affidavit provided on behalf of the injured employee. The witness specifically claimed the employer knew the dangerous nature of an asphalt mixing tank and acted with deliberate intent to injure the employee, which exceeded the scope of his knowledge. Meanwhile, even though OSHA had instructed the employer to put a safety cover on the mixer, the employee failed to prove deliberate intent to injure, considering his testimony that he had worked on the machine for over eight years and did not consider it unsafe; therefore, the court properly granted the employer's motion for summary judgment. Affirmed.
Court: Ohio Court Of Appeals, Judge: Duhart, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 2024-Ohio-1617, Categories: Employment, Tort, Experts
J. McKeague finds the trial court properly applied a career offender enhancement to defendant's sentence because his previous Ohio robbery conviction qualifies as a crime of violence. Under this court's previous ruling, Ohio robbery is not considered "generic" robbery under federal sentencing guidelines, but meets the criteria for generic extortion, which always involves the use of force; therefore, the enhancement was properly applied. Affirmed.
Court: 6th Circuit, Judge: McKeague, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 23-3466, Categories: Criminal Procedure, Robbery, Sentencing
J. Holmes finds that the lower court properly granted qualified immunity to a handful of police officials after a person who was convicted and then later declared innocent of burglary sued them with claims that they doctored up evidence to wrongfully convict him. It is recognized that our "system’s imperfection" resulted in the man being imprisoned for a crime he did not commit, but he has not gone so far as to show that the officers violated his rights or acted with blatant disregard towards his well-being during their investigation.
Court: 10th Circuit, Judge: Holmes , Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 22-8015, Categories: Civil Rights, Immunity
J. Dick grants a request by the state department of corrections, dismissing on procedural grounds the Title VII complaint of a fired black prison lieutenant, a 20-year veteran. He alleges he was fired for his use of force on an inmate, but a white captain who allegedly committed equal or greater violations of department police in the same incident, got to keep his job. The lieutenant’s claims of racial bias favoring the white captain fail because employees of different rank or status cannot be similarly situated.
Court: USDC Middle District of Louisiana, Judge: Dick, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv897, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Procedure, Employment Discrimination, Employment Retaliation
J. Eyester denies the contractor's claim for price increases. Contracted for tree removal, pruning and roadside trimming at Lake O’ the Pines, Texas, the contractor claims the Army Corps of Engineers misclassified certain services causing a $7,117 increase in performance. While certain pruning services were removed from the contract and tree removal was increased due to a deep freeze, this does not establish a prior course of dealing eliminating performance on other task orders. There is no prior course of dealing evidencing the waiver of performance.
Court: Armed Services Board Of Contract Appeals, Judge: Eyester, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 63768, Categories: Environment, Government, Contract