686 results for 'cat:"Education"'.
J. Papillion grants a university's motion to dismiss the age discrimination complaint against the president-chancellor and other college officials by an 82-year-old white, formerly tenured associate professor. The professor alleges the reasons for his firing - student complaints of allegedly racist and sexually inappropriate comments in class - are a pretext for age bias. Supervisors cannot be held individually liable under federal age discrimination law, and he has not exhausted his administrative remedies for his claims against the school.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Louisiana , Judge: Papillion, Filed On: March 21, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv1423, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Procedure, education, Employment Discrimination
J. Seybert trims a 60-year-old disabled veteran’s employment discrimination complaint against a Long Island-based law school and allows a single claim for age discrimination to proceed to discovery. The court finds comments made by one of the interviewers, who said the university wanted someone to remain in the position for several years, could suggest that age was a consideration not to hire the applicant and instead hire a younger, less qualified employee.
Court: USDC Eastern District of New York, Judge: Seybert, Filed On: March 20, 2024, Case #: 2:21cv1345, NOS: Amer w/Disabilities-Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: education, Employment, Employment Discrimination
J. D’Agostino dismisses with prejudice an employment discrimination and retaliation complaint brought against Hamilton College by a university professor, who says he was targeted for being a Black immigrant from the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Many of his allegations involve actions that occurred prior to 2018, including the university’s decision not to appoint him to chair of the French and Franco Studies Department in 2012, which the court finds are untimely.
Court: USDC Northern District of New York, Judge: D’Agostino, Filed On: March 20, 2024, Case #: 6:22cv1395, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: education, Employment Discrimination, Employment Retaliation
J. Meyer denies, in part, the board of education's motion for summary judgment, ruling that while the teacher being summoned to disciplinary meetings and having a negative comment on her performance review are not typical examples of adverse employment actions, they are sufficient to create an issue of fact and allow the First Amendment retaliation claim to proceed for the board's actions in the wake of critical comments made by the teacher regarding the district's Covid-19 policies.
Court: USDC Connecticut, Judge: Meyer, Filed On: March 19, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv425, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: education, Covid-19, First Amendment
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
[Consolidated.] J. Osteen defers consideration of a Silicon Carbide fabrication facility’s argument that its high-voltage power semiconductor patent claim term is indefinite at this stage, and so no claim construction can happen. The Purdue University Board of Trustees says construction of patent claim terms must proceed, but since the term is currently indefinite, consideration must be deferred.
Court: USDC Middle District of North Carolina, Judge: Osteen, Filed On: March 19, 2024, Case #: 1:21cv840, NOS: Patent - Property Rights, Categories: education, Patent, Technology
J. Dever grants North Carolina State University’s motion to dismiss allegations of disability discrimination brought by a Ph.D. candidate who claims the university did not accommodate his ADHD, depression and anxiety diagnoses. He requested multiple leaves of absence during his program to attend mental health appointments, which the university afforded him. An advisor gave a research assistantship to a different student because the candidate was “a liability.” However, the candidate’s hostile work environment and failure to accommodate claims are not sufficient or time-barred under the ADA.
Court: USDC Eastern District of North Carolina, Judge: Dever, Filed On: March 19, 2024, Case #: 5:23cv331, NOS: Amer w/Disabilities-Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, education, Employment Discrimination
J. Daniel partially grants Loyola University’s motion to dismiss a Title IX suit brought by a group of students who say the university mishandled and underreported their claims of sexual harassment on campus. The students’ complaint also accuses the university of failing to prevent sexual assault by repeat offenders and publishing false campus sexual assault statistics, and brings claims for fraud, premises liability, contract breach, negligence, emotional distress and violations of the Illinois Preventing Sexual Violence in Higher Education Act. The court dismisses all of these counts as well as a Jane Doe’s Title IX claims, citing, among other arguments, a lack of evidence and failure to state a claim. The remaining plaintiffs’ Title IX claims survive.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Daniel, Filed On: March 18, 2024, Case #: 1:22cv6476, NOS: Education - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, education, Emotional Distress
J. Piersol grants a motion for attorneys fees, costs and taxes awarded to parents in an Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) claim. Parents of a minor child filed a due process complaint with the South Dakota Office of Hearing Examiners alleging that the School District violated the IDEA, and that their child placement at an academy in Utah for therapy and a standard education should be paid for by the School District. As the prevailing party, the parents were entitled to fees and costs.
Court: USDC South Dakota, Judge: Piersol , Filed On: March 18, 2024, Case #: 4:21cv4147, NOS: Education - Civil Rights, Categories: education, Attorney Fees
J. Simon denies the adoptive parents' motion for a preliminary injunction seeking to have the hearing officer's dismissal of their complaint vacated. The complaint alleged the school denied their psychologically challenged child a free and appropriate education when the child's patterns of self-injury and abuse re-emerged after treatment. The parents fail to show a need for the injunction, and the relief sought is neither preliminary nor injunctive in nature. Furthermore, they do not establish any likelihood of irreparable harm, nor a likelihood they will succeed on the merits.
Court: USDC Northern District of Indiana, Judge: Simon , Filed On: March 18, 2024, Case #: 4:23cv79, NOS: Amer w/Disabilities - Other - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, education, Injunction
J. Marbley denies the university's motion for summary judgment, ruling the black professor's EEOC complaints and internal communications about false allegations of sexual assault were protected activity under Title VII and establish a causal link to his termination that allows his retaliation claim to proceed. The university claims it fired the professor after the results of its investigation validated the sexual assault claims, but because the Faculty Senate Hearing Committee disputed this result on two occasions and found the investigation "troubling," the professor has made a prima facie showing of pretext.
Court: USDC Southern District of Ohio, Judge: Marbley, Filed On: March 18, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv2028, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: education, Evidence, Employment Retaliation
J. Biggs partially denies the University of North Carolina’s motion for summary judgment following claims of racial discrimination brought by a Ph.D. candidate. Specifically, the candidate, a Black man, claims his dissertation committee plagiarized his work and re-attributed it to another student and did not behave this way with other candidates of different races. There is enough evidence to call the university and committee into question such that qualified immunity is suspended at this time.
Court: USDC Middle District of North Carolina, Judge: Biggs, Filed On: March 15, 2024, Case #: 1:20cv1050, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, education, Immunity
J. Barker grants the school's motion for summary judgment on a high school student's constitutional challenge to the temporary revocation of his pro-life club. The student knew of the requirements of the Indiana Tort Claims Act under which certain claims were filed, and failed to satisfy form, timing and content requirements. No cogent argument has been made regarding claims of ineffective notice.
Court: USDC Southern District of Indiana, Judge: Barker , Filed On: March 15, 2024, Case #: 1:21cv3075, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, education, Municipal Law
J. Dimke partially denies summary judgment to the family for their complaint that the school district's employee did not prepare an adequate emergency care plan for their child's asthma, which allegedly led to his death after 18 days on life support following a severe asthma attack. While it is undisputed that the school district had some knowledge of the child's asthma from previous school years, a dispute remains as to the extent and timing of this knowledge.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Washington, Judge: Dimke, Filed On: March 15, 2024, Case #: 4:19cv5038, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: education, Negligence, Wrongful Death
J. Wooton reverses the lower court's Dec. 1 order granting the public library's and parks and recreation district's writ of mandamus compelling the Board to disburse funds withheld from fiscal years 2024 and 2025 from a 2018 excess levy. Since all other county boards of education can seek approval of excess levies without restrictions, the court finds the obligations to fund the library and district in the 1967 and 2011 legislative special acts violates the equal protection clause of the West Virginia Constitution. Reversed.
Court: West Virginia Supreme Court Of Appeals, Judge: Wooton , Filed On: March 15, 2024, Case #: 23-691, Categories: education, Government, Tax
J. Epley finds the lower court properly granted the school district's motion for summary judgment on race discrimination claims filed by a black employee. She failed to establish a prima facie case for discrimination, given that she was not replaced with an employee outside her protected class and the district had legitimate reasons not to renew her contract. Affirmed.
Court: Ohio Court Of Appeals, Judge: Epley, Filed On: March 15, 2024, Case #: 2024-Ohio-979, Categories: education, Evidence, Employment Discrimination
J. Haight grants the assistant superintendent's motion for judgment on the pleadings, ruling the parents' failure to cite any specific actions taken by the official as an individual that infringed or may have infringed on their constitutional rights is fatal to all of their constitutional claims related to the alleged discrimination their children suffered.
Court: USDC Connecticut, Judge: Haight, Filed On: March 14, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv1130, NOS: Education - Civil Rights, Categories: education, First Amendment
J. Osteen denies a male university student’s motion for preliminary injunction following an investigation into allegations of rape and sexual assault brought against him by a female student. The male student, found responsible for sexual misconduct, counters by saying that procedural irregularities in the investigation and hearing were committed against him based on gender bias. However, the male student provides no evidence of gender bias or violation of the university’s Title IX policy.
Court: USDC Middle District of North Carolina, Judge: Osteen, Filed On: March 14, 2024, Case #: 1:24cv41, NOS: Education - Civil Rights, Categories: education, Tort, Assault
J. Kafker reverses in part the granting of summary judgment in favor of a university against members of its tenured faculty suing it for requiring them to obtain 50% of their individual salaries from external research funding to avoid salary cuts and being reduced to part-time employees, and for requiring that their external funding maintain a specific cost recovery rate to avoid reductions in the size of their labs. While summary judgment is appropriate concerning lab sizes, because nothing in the faculty members’ tenure documents guarantees lab space, it is not appropriate where it concerns economic security, which is included in the tenure documents and could limit the university’s ability to reduce salary and full-time status.
Court: Massachusetts Supreme Court, Judge: Kafker, Filed On: March 14, 2024, Case #: SJC-13472, Categories: education, Employment, Contract
J. Sannes preserves claims for hostile work environment and Title IX gender discrimination against St. Lawrence University, who was sued by a sociology professor who claims she was drugged and raped by a fellow professor at his off-campus home. The court finds the complaint successfully imputes liability for the sexual assault onto the university under Title XI on the basis of deliberate indifference before and after the assault, and further sufficiently alleges that the alleged perpetrator’s actions after the sexual assault were threatening and constituted a hostile work environment. Additionally, the court trims a countercomplaint filed by the alleged perpetrator and preserves a single claim for defamation regarding Facebook posts she made alleging she was a victim of rape.
Court: USDC Southern District of New York, Judge: Sannes, Filed On: March 14, 2024, Case #: 8:23cv426, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: education, Defamation, Assault
J. Baylson denies Thomas Jefferson University’s motion for judgment on the pleadings over a female medical resident’s sex discrimination claim stemming from her allegedly being raped when at a party at the home of an attending male physician, but does order a new trial on on her Title IX claim. The jury’s verdict on the sex discrimination claim was not against the weight of evidence, however a new trial is warranted in part because the university’s counsel was not allowed to cross-examine important witnesses and because the court should not have excluded certain text messages that contradicted the medical resident’s testimony at trial.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Judge: Baylson, Filed On: March 14, 2024, Case #: 2:20cv2967, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: education, Employment, Evidence
J. Seabright partially denies summary judgment to the university in a dispute with its women’s softball head coach, who claims the school refused to pay her the full salary for head coaches, despite paying male coaches more. The coach established that she and the male coaches, including her predecessor, were similarly experienced and were classified as part-time, just as she was, despite the university claiming her lower pay was based on the job status. The coach’s retaliation claims, however, meet the burden for summary judgment as there is no evidence that she suffered negative consequences for reported the pay gap, as was even promoted to head coach after the initial complaints.
Court: USDC Hawaii, Judge: Seabright, Filed On: March 13, 2024, Case #: 1:22cv400, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: education, Evidence, Employment Discrimination
J. Toth denies the veteran's petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to prevent Veterans Affairs from limiting his continued entitlement to post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits while his administrative appeal proceeds. Though he said he will suffer irreparable harm if the issue was not resolved before the fall 2023 semester, he can still appeal any future adverse agency decision affecting the benefits, and so has an adequate alternative means of relief. Threat of irreparable harm has been removed by action that correctly calculated the veteran's eligibility for continued benefits before the semester began.
Court: Court Of Appeals For Veterans Claims, Judge: Toth , Filed On: March 13, 2024, Case #: 23-2589, Categories: education, Veterans, Due Process
J. Geraci rules in part against a college accused of disciplining a male student based on gender bias after he was accused of sexual assault by a female student. The student failed to identify express promises related to contract breaches, but a reasonable jury could find the college wrongfully flipped the burden of proof. Meanwhile, text messages from the female student cast doubts on her sexual assault allegations.
Court: USDC Western District of New York, Judge: Geraci , Filed On: March 11, 2024, Case #: 6:21cv6761, NOS: Education - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, education
J. Wolford dismisses claims contending the state wrongfully required Amish schoolchildren to receive vaccines against religious objections and issued non-compliance orders against Amish private schools because evidence does not indicate the state education commissioner had or will have any role in enforcing state public health laws. Meanwhile, the laws at issue do not contain hostility toward religious beliefs, and the fact that the state has not accomplished complete compliance among all students does not mean the law is not generally applicable.
Court: USDC Western District of New York, Judge: Wolford , Filed On: March 11, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv484, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, education
[Modified.] J. Stratton adds one sentence calling for appellant to pay costs on appeal with no change in judgment. Substantial evidence supported a university's decision to use a combined investigator-adjudicator procedure in proceedings that resulted in a student's expulsion for intimate partner violence. Neither the original proceedings nor the appellate process violated the student's due process rights. Affirmed.
Court: California Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Stratton, Filed On: March 8, 2024, Case #: B290675, Categories: Civil Rights, education, Due Process