3,456 results for 'cat:"Evidence"'.
J. Worthen finds the trial court properly terminated the divorce proceedings. Though the couple were previously in a romantic relationship for more than 20 years, they agree that no ceremonial marriage ever occurred, nor did they ever file a declaration and registration of an informal marriage. General, conclusory statements from a witness with whom the couple socialized are not sufficient to raise a fact issue as to whether they represented to others they were married. No evidence presented raises a fact issue as to a formal or informal marriage existing. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Worthen , Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 12-23-00230-CV, Categories: evidence, Family Law
J. Gannam finds the trial court improperly applied the correct legal standards when finding the father contributed to the children’s dependency status after basing the decision on the belief the father's corporal discipline was abusive. There is not enough evidence to prove the father “engaged in conduct placing [the kids] at substantial risk of imminent abuse.” Therefore, this case is remanded for the children’s placement with the appropriate proceedings. Reversed.
Court: Florida Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Gannam, Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 6D24-105, Categories: evidence, Family Law
J. Hixson finds the trial court properly convicted defendant for the first-degree murder of his 3-year-old son. Defendant's girlfriend testified defendant punished the child by whipping him on his back with a belt and wooden spoon for peeing on himself and cussing, also saying this instance was more violent than previous punishments. After leaving the room, the girlfriend returned when things got quiet to see the child lying motionless on the floor. The child died later that day after receiving medical attention. Sufficient evidence, including forensic/medical photographs, the belt, an extension cord and the broken wooden spoon demonstrate defendant knew his conduct of repeated blunt-force trauma to the child's head and torso was deadly. Affirmed.
Court: Arkansas Court Of Appeals, Judge: Hixson , Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: CR-23-196, Categories: evidence, Murder, Child Victims
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Thyer finds the trial court properly convicted defendant for sexual assault. Defendant's charge of rape against his 9-year-old daughter was reduced to second-degree sexual assault on the victim's testimony that she was petting her dog after a bad dream when defendant entered the room, pulled her off the bed and put his penis between her "butt cheeks." The mother witnessed the assault, and friends and other family were told about it before police were called. The testimony does not need to be corroborated and sufficient evidence supports the conviction. Affirmed.
Court: Arkansas Court Of Appeals, Judge: Thyer , Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: CR-23-410, Categories: evidence, Sex Offender, Child Victims
J. Johnson finds that defendant was properly convicted of first degree rape of a juvenile under the age of 13. The victim testified that defendant, his mother's ex-boyfriend, sexually abused him when he was seven or eight years old, and that the abuse occurred when his mother was at work. Further, defendant did not challenge the state's intent to call a nurse as an expert to specifically address the issues of “general child sexual abuse, specifically addressing issues of delayed disclosure and the affect sexual abuse may have on children concerning delayed and partial disclosure." Affirmed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Johnson , Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 23-KA-375, Categories: evidence, Sex Offender, Experts
[Consolidated.] J. Herman finds that the trial court should not have denied a truck driver's motion to continue trial after he claimed that the car driver concealed telephone calls with “an indicted conspirator in over 50 staged accidents.” In this case, the possibility of fraud being perpetrated on the judicial system constitutes good cause for a continuance. The record shows that the car driver placed or received approximately 30 calls to and from the indicted conspirator on the day of the accident, both before and after the collision. Vacated.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Herman , Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 2023-CA-0480, Categories: evidence, Negligence
J. Moore affirms the defendant's second-degree murder conviction, finding that while the district court abused its discretion in admitting evidence that a witness received threatening phone calls from an unknown caller, the defendant has not demonstrated that there was a reasonable possibility that this evidence significantly impacted the verdict. Affirmed.
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court, Judge: Moore, Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: A22-0316, Categories: evidence, Murder, Witnesses
J. Greer finds that defendant was properly convicted of first-degree murder for killing his girlfriend's aunt in light of the mountain of circumstantial evidence supporting his conviction. Affirmed.
Court: Iowa Court Of Appeals, Judge: Greer, Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 22-1711, Categories: evidence, Murder
J. Aoyagi finds the trial court properly ruled that defendant broke the law by moving his phone from the dash to his lap while driving. Officer’s testimony established that defendant “used” his cellphone within the meaning of the statute. Affirmed.
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals, Judge: Aoyagi, Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: A180213, Categories: evidence
J. Miller finds the trial court properly convicted defendant of criminal mischief following a non-jury trial over a road rage incident. Defendant's challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction fail, as the record shows defendant intentionally swung a golf club at another motorist's car three times after the motorist retreated. Affirmed.
Court: Florida Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Miller, Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 22-2140, Categories: evidence, Vehicle
J. Abramson finds the county court properly quieted title to the property in favor of the residents. The property owner filed an unlawful-detainer complaint against the mobile home residents, alleging they had detained possession after he had attempted to gain possession by civil notice. The owner argues the residents failed to establish their curtilage is contiguous to their own property, conceding the contested property and the residents' property are contiguous. This satisfies for adverse possession. Affirmed.
Court: Arkansas Court Of Appeals, Judge: Abramson , Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: CV-22-585, Categories: evidence, Property
J. Lawrence finds the lower court properly named the wife sole residential parent of the child. Although both parents were actively involved in the child's life, the husband's short temper and history of excessive spanking made the wife's home a safer and more suitable environment. Meanwhile, the award of child support over the statutorily required amount was supported by evidence in the record, including a joint decision to send the child to private school and the fact the husband was not working to his full earning capacity at the time of the separation. Affirmed.
Court: Mississippi Court Of Appeals, Judge: Lawrence, Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 2022-CA-804, Categories: evidence, Family Law
C.J. Hudson partially affirms the defendant's convictions stemming from a 1993 cold-case murder. The district court did not err in finding that the defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in DNA found on a discarded napkin at a hockey game and that analysis of the DNA was therefore not a search. Any error in precluding the defendant from presenting evidence of an alternative perpetrator at trial was harmless, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding expert testimony as late discovery. Prosecutors' statements in closing arguments did not constitute error, circumstantial evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict that the defendant was guilty of first-degree murder, and the defendant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel. It was, however, error to convict the defendant of both first-degree felony murder and second-degree intentional murder, a lesser-included offense. Affirmed in part.
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court, Judge: Hudson, Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: A22-1679, Categories: Dna, evidence, Murder
J. Marcel finds that defendant was properly convicted of eight counts of simple burglary of an inhabited dwelling, theft, and aggravated flight from an officer. In this case, there was testimony from an accomplice that he committed the burglaries with defendant. Further, items from two of the burgled homes were found in defendant's home. Also, there was surveillance footage that connected a truck stolen by defendant to several of the burglaries. Multiple witnesses testified that defendant drove at excessive speeds while disregarding stop signs as he fled from an officer with his lights activated. Affirmed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Marcel, Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 22-KA-373, Categories: Burglary, evidence, Theft
[Consolidated.] J. Ervin-Knott finds that the trial court properly found for the medical provider on a patient's claim that his mental disorder was misdiagnosed, and he was overprescribed Adderall. In this case, the medical provider admitted the medical review panel's unanimous opinion that the medical provider did not breach the applicable standard of care. Further, the patient admitted that he did not retain an expert to support his case. Affirmed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Ervin-Knott, Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 2024-CA-0010, Categories: evidence, Medical Malpractice
J. Badding finds that defendant was improperly convicted of drug offenses after police found mushrooms inside his residence because drug tests did not confirm the presence of psilocybin in mushrooms confiscated from the scene. Reversed in part.
Court: Iowa Court Of Appeals, Judge: Badding, Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 22-1988, Categories: Drug Offender, evidence
J. Worthen finds the trial court properly granted the city's motion for summary judgment. The probationary patrol officer, who was prescribed Percocet for pain management of pancreatitis, was terminated for failure to perform his duties. Sufficient evidence shows the officer was unable to satisfactorily perform the duties of his job. No error is found in the court's exclusion of evidence of the city's background check on the officer. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Worthen , Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 12-23-00289-CV, Categories: Employment, evidence, Municipal Law
J. Hoyle finds the trial court properly convicted defendant for murder. Testimony from neighbors shows defendant and his girlfriend were experiencing tension in the relationship after their daughter was born, and that this was exacerbated by defendant's recent wreck in his truck and a winter storm. A female witness with whom defendant had flirted in the past testified the girlfriend retrieved a gun when defendant taunted her with the flirtation. Defendant shot and killed the girlfriend when attempting to take the gun from her. His version of how the shooting occurred was inconsistent with the blood spatter evidence and other forensic evidence, such as the fact that the bullet did not exit the girlfriend's skull. A rational factfinder reasonably could infer that defendant intentionally or knowingly shot the victim. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Hoyle , Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 12-23-00208-CR, Categories: evidence, Firearms, Murder
J. Fowlkes dismisses this legal malpractice lawsuit for failure to state a claim and denies the pro se plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend, calling such an effort futile. The malpractice claim allegedly stems from the defendant attorney’s legal representation in an underlying criminal case. However, the plaintiff has failed to show “that he has obtained post-conviction relief,” and his amended complaint also fails to show why the case should not be dismissed.
Court: USDC Western District of Tennessee , Judge: Fowlkes, Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 2:20cv2174, NOS: Mandamus & Other - Habeas Corpus, Categories: Civil Procedure, evidence, Legal Malpractice
J. Wicker finds that the trial court should not have found for the defendant driver in this car collision action because the trial court admitted the defendant driver's out-of-court statements that she had the green light. The plaintiff driver's undisputed testimony stated that he had the green light and did not see the defendant driver's car when he entered the intersection, which supports that the accident was solely caused by the defendant driver. Reversed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Wicker, Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 23-CA-298, Categories: evidence, Negligence