1,029 results for 'nos:"Insurance - Contract"'.
J. Morgan denies a request by an Illinois-based insurer to compel arbitration of a dispute with a New Orleans-based law firm for its defense and indemnity from a lawsuit in the state of California. That the underlying litigation is in California is an insufficient reason to trigger the application of California law. Louisiana’s policy interests would be most seriously impaired if its law were not applied.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Louisiana , Judge: Morgan, Filed On: April 16, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv6235, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Arbitration, Choice Of Law
J. Pascal allows insurers to file an amended answer in an action contending total loss claims stemming from car collisions had been undervalued because the counterclaims are based on new sets of facts and plausibly allege one of the drivers had not entered a valid contract with an insurer.
Court: USDC New Jersey, Judge: Pascal , Filed On: April 15, 2024, Case #: 1:21cv20510, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Insurance, Contract
J. Bennett grants cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings in favor of Under Armour brought by the insurer in this insurance dispute from a consolidated class action over securities, derivative matters and a government investigation. The parties reached an agreement, and they no longer dispute the insurance coverage during the relevant times.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Bennett, Filed On: April 15, 2024, Case #: 1:22cv2481, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Insurance, Securities, Class Action
J. Fallon grants a policyholder’s request for default judgment against an insurer for liability in connection with its alleged failure to provide sufficient funds to cover hurricane damage to her two properties. Although the insurer received service in October 2023, it did not engage in the litigation by February 2024. The insurer also did not participate in a March 2024 hearing in which the property owner took the stand and testified to “the saga she has experienced in the years following Hurricane Ida [2021] attempting to work with various State Farm adjusters, inspectors and representatives." Citing an incomplete evidentiary record as to the more than $4.5 million sought, a separate proceeding must be held on the damages to which the property owner is entitled.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Louisiana , Judge: Fallon, Filed On: April 12, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv4618, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Evidence, Insurance, Damages
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Schroeder grants an agricultural insurance company’s motion to dismiss allegations of breach of contract, deceptive trade practices and bad faith brought by a policy holder. Specifically, the policy holder claims the company wrongfully refused to pay under its crop insurance policy. However, because the policy holder did not respond to the company’s motion, and the time to do so has passed, the motion is granted and the case dismissed.
Court: USDC Middle District of North Carolina, Judge: Schroeder, Filed On: April 12, 2024, Case #: 1:24cv116, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Agriculture, Insurance, Contract
J. Du grants an insurer's motion to dismiss this breach of contract claim. The homeowners sued the insurer for refusing to pay for more than 12 months of loss of use coverage after a tree fell on their house. The loss of use provision in the policy has been replaced with a "special provisions—Nevada endorsement" that requires the insurer pay additional living expenses for 12 months from the date of loss. There is no allegation or dispute it did not do this.
Court: USDC Nevada, Judge: Du, Filed On: April 11, 2024, Case #: 3:24cv60, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Insurance, Contract
J. Godbey finds that a property owner that submitted an insurance claim for damages after discovering that an easement for a gas line on a recently purchased property may continue litigation on the claim that the insurance company breached a contract by not fully compensating plaintiff for damages related to the adverse interest in the property. The insurance company failed to adequately show that it met all contract obligations to the property owner. Summary judgment is granted to the insurance company on three other claims by the property owner, but breach of contract survives.
Court: USDC Northern District of Texas , Judge: Godbey, Filed On: April 11, 2024, Case #: 3:21cv2837, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Insurance, Real Estate, Contract
J. Lemelle denies a request by an insurer to dismiss two homeowners’ breach of contract and bad faith claims related to their insurer’s alleged failure to compensate them for hurricane-related property damage. The insurer mistakenly contends the property owners’ insurance suit is time-barred for failure to provide notice of their claim within 365 days of the event. State law prohibits insurance policies from limiting its insured's right to sue to a period of less than two years.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Louisiana , Judge: Lemelle, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv5396, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Insurance, Damages
J. Kocoras partially grants and partially denies both groups of window and curtain companies’ motions for summary judgment on the plaintiff companies’ patent claims against the defendants. The plaintiff companies alleges the defendant companies are infringing on their patents for a curtain wall system used for facades in high-rise buildings, which the defendants contest. The court splits the opposing motions for summary judgment; finding the defendants have not infringed on certain elements of the system but have infringed on others.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Kocoras, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: 1:21cv6618, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Construction, Patent, Technology
J. Pulliam mostly grants an insurer’s motion for summary judgment in a dispute with policyholders over payout for roof damage, which the insurer contends was largely uncovered wear-and-tear. While the policyholders have not shown bad faith, and the insurer is therefore entitled to summary judgement on most of their claims, the insurer has conversely presented “no specific argument” for dismissing the remainder of the case, including for alleged violations of the Texas Prompt Payment Act.
Court: USDC Western District of Texas , Judge: Pulliam, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: 5:23cv411, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Insurance, Contract
J. Rakoff denies summary judgment to both parties in this insurance coverage dispute. Water pipes burst in two units of two contiguous commercial properties during a winter storm, and the insured filed a claim for resulting water damage. The insurer denied the claim citing an exclusion to the insurance contract that stipulates the insured must make “best efforts to maintain heat.” The insured argues every effort was made to maintain heat in the buildings, but the insurer claims one unit used no gas for a three month period implying heat was not maintained. Both parties argue the ambiguity of the contract language, which the instant court finds should be sorted out at trial. Because no overwhelming evidence was presented in favor of either party, summary judgment is denied.
Court: USDC Southern District of New York, Judge: Rakoff, Filed On: April 8, 2024, Case #: 23cv6437, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Insurance, Contract
J. Lioi grants, in part, State Farm's motion for judgment on the pleadings, ruling any cause of action limited by the one-year filing limitation in the homeowners' insurance policy must be dismissed for the homeowners' failure to file suit within one year of the storm that caused water intrusion and property damage, as State Farm did not waive the limitation.
Court: USDC Northern District of Ohio, Judge: Lioi, Filed On: April 8, 2024, Case #: 5:23cv1124, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Civil Procedure, Insurance, Contract
J. Engelmayer appoints a neutral arbitrator per the dispute resolution terms of the parties’ commercial insurance contract. A Texas school district filed claims under its commercial insurance policy after school district property incurred damage during a hurricane. A dispute resulted regarding the extent of the school district’s coverage and the matter was submitted to arbitration. They were unable to agree on a single arbitrator, and after each appointing an arbitrator, the arbitrators were unable to agree on an umpire, therefore the matter was submitted to the instant court for selection of a qualified neutral arbitrator to oversee the matter. Having done so the case is ordered closed.
Court: USDC Southern District of New York, Judge: Engelmayer, Filed On: April 8, 2024, Case #: 23cv8957, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Arbitration, Civil Procedure, Insurance
J. Russell denies the defendant insurance company's motion to exclude certain expert testimony in this breach of contract lawsuit involving damage to a boat dock. The court finds that the expert is "qualified and his methodology is reliable." However, the court will partially grant the company's motions in limine. Specifically, the expert cannot define the company's "duty of good faith and fair dealing" or provide an opinion "on the ultimate conclusions" as to whether the company acted in bad faith.
Court: USDC Northern District of Oklahoma , Judge: Russell, Filed On: April 4, 2024, Case #: 4:18cv504, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Insurance, Experts, Contract
J. McCalla determines how the funds should be paid in this interpleader case arising from an alleged arson fire and alleged theft at the House of Blues recording studio. One of the individual defendants, who leased a studio and certain equipment from the owner, should receive $2,066,217 of the Business Personal Property award, as his lease "did not terminate with the fire."
Court: USDC Western District of Tennessee , Judge: McCalla, Filed On: April 4, 2024, Case #: 2:20cv2834, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Insurance, Property, Damages
J. Cain denies a request by a surplus line insurance company to dismiss a parish sheriff’s suit for damages to a public building caused by two hurricanes and a winter storm. The insurer argues coverage of the damaged building should be voided to the sheriff’s “misrepresentations” on ownership. The insurer has not shown how certain statements by the sheriff’s office are material to the insurer’s claims, “let alone pointed to any circumstances that they were made with the intent to deceive.”
Court: USDC Western District of Louisiana , Judge: Cain, Filed On: April 3, 2024, Case #: 2:21cv3947, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Fraud, Government, Insurance