71 results for 'judge:"Kamins"'.
J. Kamins finds the trial court properly entered an SPO against defendant. “The record was legally sufficient to support the trial court’s conclusion that respondent had engaged in repeated and unwanted contacts that caused petitioner to experience objectively reasonable harm.” Affirmed.
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals, Judge: Kamins, Filed On: July 6, 2023, Case #: A178718, Categories: Assault
J. Kamins finds the juvenile court properly changed two children’s permanency plans from reunification to adoption. The evidence “includes psychological reports, expert testimony, and testimony from both children.” Affirmed.
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals, Judge: Kamins, Filed On: June 22, 2023, Case #: A179775, Categories: Evidence, Family Law
J. Kamins finds the trial court erred by denying an acquittal motion by defendant, convicted of unlawfully purchasing a firearm. The state concedes the record lacked evidence that defendant knew she could not buy a gun. Reversed.
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals, Judge: Kamins, Filed On: June 22, 2023, Case #: A176594, Categories: Evidence, Firearms
J. Kamins finds the trial court erred in convicting defendant of assaulting a public safety officer. “The evidence indicated that defendant did not use enough force to cause pain where he impacted the officer.” Reversed.
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals, Judge: Kamins, Filed On: June 22, 2023, Case #: A176984, Categories: Evidence, Assault
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Kamins finds the trial court properly convicted defendant of violating a speed limit. “A lack of additional calibration tests is not enough to raise authenticity questions.” Affirmed.
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals, Judge: Kamins, Filed On: June 22, 2023, Case #: A177167, Categories: Experts
J. Kamins finds the juvenile court erred by ruling in favor of the state regarding evidence. “Once the police executed the search warrant for D’s phones, the state’s failure to disclose its possession of the phones during the factfinding proceeding violated due process, because they likely contained content that was material to youth’s self-defense claim.” Reversed.
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals, Judge: Kamins, Filed On: June 7, 2023, Case #: A175772, Categories: Evidence, Juvenile Law, Due Process
J. Kamins finds the trial court erred by accepting improper prosecutorial statements. “Because the presumption of innocence is ‘fundamental to the American justice system,’ the misstatements were made at the end of rebuttal, and the prosecutor compounded the error by arguing that the state is also entitled to due process.” Reversed.
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals, Judge: Kamins, Filed On: June 7, 2023, Case #: A175803, Categories: Prosecutorial Misconduct