989 results for 'cat:"Attorney Fees"'.
J. Holmes partially grants the individual plaintiff's motion for attorney fees in connection with his motion to compel discovery. The court previously ordered the defendant company to produce certain documents and "to make a corporate representative available" to provide testimony on certain topics. The defendant company now argues that there was a conflict regarding its duties under Italian data privacy laws, but the court concludes that its failure to provide certain documents was not "substantially justified." Not all of the requested fees are reasonable, however, as a discovery sanction.
Court: USDC Middle District of Tennessee , Judge: Holmes, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 3:20cv1103, NOS: Personal Injury - Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Sanctions, Discovery, attorney Fees
J. Edwards finds that the lower court improperly assessed costs against the prospective adoptive parents in this case involving their adoption petition and the biological mother's withdrawal of consent. The amount of the award is not supported by the record. The case is remanded for the lower court "to itemize the costs it assessed against the prospective adoptive parents and to permit them, if necessary, to challenge any particular costs." Reversed in part.
Court: Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, Judge: Edwards, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: CL-2023-0572, Categories: Evidence, Family Law, attorney Fees
J. Immergut grants the insurance company's motion to compel arbitration in the insured's lawsuit alleging that the insurance company wrongfully disagreed with the value of the insured's claim for the injuries she sustained while pregnant during an accident with an at-fault, underinsured motorist. The insured implicitly agreed to arbitration when her demand letter stated that she “demands, consents, offers and commits to arbitration," so no new consideration is required. The insured also limited her ability her recovery attorney fees when she instituted arbitration proceedings.
Court: USDC Oregon, Judge: Immergut, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 3:24cv25, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Arbitration, Insurance, attorney Fees
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
Per curiam, the appellate division finds that the homeowner is entitled to nominal damages of $10 in a breach of contract action against her neighbor who completed their renovation using a cheaper brick that does not exactly match the homeowner's front façade. No evidence was admitted as to the cost of the bricks the defendant neighbor used, so it is not possible to determine the difference between that figure and the cost of matching bricks. However, the homeowner is entitled to attorney fees of $30,000, 10 percent of the amount she requested. Affirmed.
Court: New York Appellate Divisions, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 02253, Categories: attorney Fees, Contract
J. Nivison grants in part a behavioral health and education company’s motion for the exclusion of certain expert testimony and the reimbursement of attorney fees after they were sued by the parents of an adult who defendant allegedly failed to provide appropriate care for. The parents’ expert witness designations are adequate but it is inappropriate that counsel attempted to influence the expert testimony.
Court: USDC Maine, Judge: Nivison, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv54, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Experts, Discovery, attorney Fees
J. Hixon finds the district court improperly entered summary judgment in favor of the law firm in this attorney fee dispute. The partnered law firm sought declaratory judgment regarding the enforceability of a fee-splitting and referral agreement, bringing multiple contract and fraud-based allegations, and seeking damages for alleged nonpayment. Though the agreement and associated contracts do not comply with requirements of a particular rule of professional conduct, the rule may not be used as a defense. Summary judgment on cases not litigated by the attorney was properly entered. Reversed in part.
Court: Oklahoma Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Hixon , Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 120999, Categories: attorney Fees, Contract
[Amended.] J. Meyer amends a previously published opinion to include the name of an additional attorney representing a neighbor in a dispute. The trial court properly ruled for a property owner who claimed his neighbor breached an agreement that settled their easement dispute. The neighbor refused to pay for an agreed-upon cattle guard and he placed a gate across an easement road, and then he failed to timely respond to the property owner's motion for summary judgment. However, the trial court erred in dismissing the neighbor's trespass claim on standing grounds. Also, an attorney fee award to the owner for pressing his summary judgment motion was proper but the owner was also entitled to fees for defending against the neighbor's motion for reconsideration. Vacated in part.
Court: Idaho Supreme Court, Judge: Meyer, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 49628, Categories: Property, Settlements, attorney Fees
J. Smith finds that the trial court properly and improperly ruled in a breach of fiduciary duty case filed by the co-owner of a corporation against an attorney who represented the corporation in litigation. The co-owners alleged in their complaint that the attorney failed to inform the corporation's board of directors of a possible conflict of interest and aided another owner of the corporation in starting a competing firm. Nothing in the evidence establishes a relationship between the co-owner and the attorney. However, remaining questions on the award of attorney fees in this litigation still exist and should be adjudicated. Affirmed in part.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Smith, Filed On: April 24, 2024, Case #: 03-22-00234-CV, Categories: Corporations, Fiduciary Duty, attorney Fees
J. Segal finds that the trial court should have granted an employer's motion to vacate a renewal of judgment for interest on an attorney fee award. Following a reversal that added to a previous attorney fee award in favor of an employee, the employee's attorneys sought interest from the time of the original trial court denial of fees. But because the appellate decision was not a modification, the interest on the fee award began to accrue when the appeals court reversed. Reversed.
Court: California Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Segal, Filed On: April 24, 2024, Case #: B327821, Categories: Civil Procedure, Employment, attorney Fees
J. Marcel vacates the trial court's granting of costs to the plaintiff driver in a car collision action. In this case, the defendant driver made an offer of $75,000 that the plaintiff driver did not accept, and the plaintiff driver obtained a final judgment of $12,500, which is at least twenty-five percent less than the amount offered. Statute compensates the rejected offeror who is forced to incur greater trial litigation costs that could have been avoided if the offeree had not acted unreasonably in rejecting the offer. However, the amount of those costs remains within the broad discretion of the trial
court. Vacated.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Marcel, Filed On: April 24, 2024, Case #: 23-CA-488, Categories: attorney Fees, Contract
J. Ortego finds that the trial court improperly awarded the plantation $440,500 in attorney fees for its property dispute with the district. The award is moot because the expropriation of the plantation's and others' properties are not less than what the district's levee board offered them, which violates applicable law. Reversed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Ortego, Filed On: April 24, 2024, Case #: CA-23-83, Categories: attorney Fees
J. Gill finds the lower court improperly dismissed a tenant's claims for damages and attorney fees associated with an allegedly illegal eviction. A tenant was served with a five-day eviction notice by a landlord during a period when evictions were prohibited due to Covid-19. While the landlord eventually moved to dismiss its claim, the tenant’s counterclaims moved forward, but were dismissed on grounds that the Wisconsin Consumer Act did not apply to residential leases. But the instant court finds it does apply, as a residential lease is a consumer transaction, with the tenant as the customer. The matter is remanded to determine attorney fees owed to tenant’s counsel and to determine the amount of damages to be awarded to the tenant. Reversed.
Court: Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Judge: Gill, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 2022AP182, Categories: Landlord Tenant, Damages, attorney Fees
J. Navarro-McKelvey dismisses the department's appeal of the lower court's decision to apply a multiplier to the award of attorneys' fees to the employee who prevailed in a sexual harassment suit. The department failed to show that the issue of waiver of sovereign immunity for attorneys' fees multipliers falls under the jurisdictional exception to the claim preservation requirements.
Court: Missouri Court Of Appeals, Judge: Navarro-McKelvey, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: ED111748, Categories: Civil Rights, Immunity, attorney Fees
J. Anderson grants, in part, attorney fees, interest and conditional appeals fees to a company that filed a breach of contract claim in state court but then filed a motion to dismiss to file a new claim in federal court in which the company prevailed. The attorney fees and interest are not recoverable for the case in the state court because of the defendant’s LLC status, but the fees are recoverable in federal court. The requests for fees pertaining to the federal case are granted in full.
Court: USDC Southern District of Texas, Judge: Anderson, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 3:21cv298, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Civil Procedure, Venue, attorney Fees
J. Delaney recommends granting, in part, a disabled man’s motion for default judgment on his Americans with Disabilities Act claims against a restaurant. He sufficiently alleges the sidewalk was too steeply sloped, and the sales counter and bathroom sink were too high, among other ADA-related issues.
Court: USDC Eastern District of California, Judge: Delaney, Filed On: April 22, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv759, NOS: Amer w/Disabilities - Other - Civil Rights, Categories: Ada / Rehabilitation Act, attorney Fees
J. Pregerson grants in part Nike's motion for attorney fees in a trademark dispute. A company alleged that Nike and Nordstrom infringed upon its stylized “N” design in their “Nordstrom x Nike” collaboration. The court found that the company owner "misled by omission" his relationship with another party, who turned out to be his mother, and that the relationship was significant regarding proof of the sale of branded products during the relevant period. The company was ordered to pay attorney fees for the discovery misconduct. Days before the scheduled ESI investigation, the company owner alleged that all devices that were scheduled to be searched had been stolen from his car. Nike seeks "full" attorney fees, arguing that the case is "exceptional" due to the discovery misconduct. Nike is awarded $1,491,634 in attorney fees and costs.
Court: USDC Central District of California, Judge: Pregerson, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 2:21cv398, NOS: Trademark - Property Rights, Categories: Trademark, Discovery, attorney Fees
J. Marshall grants the protester $1.1 million in attorney fees after a jury found in his favor and awarded him $85,000 in damages on his excessive force and Monell claims that were part of his complaint alleging that the city's officers beat him for participating in a protest against the murder of George Floyd. The city requests a fee reduction because the protester did not prevail on all of his claims, but "the time spent on claims for which plaintiff did not prevail cannot reasonably be separated from time spent on claims on which plaintiff did prevail."
Court: USDC Central District of California, Judge: Marshall, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 2:21cv6470, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, attorney Fees, Police Misconduct
J. Cain denies an insurer's request for sanctions of attorney fees against a lawyer and his law firm for suing the insurer after the insurer had settled a property owner’s hurricane damage claim with other counsel. The lawyer and his firm acted in bad faith throughout the litigation and sanctions are appropriate. However, because the proof of billing hours submitted by insurance counsel are inadequate, insurance counsel are allowed time to support the reasonableness of the fees sought.
Court: USDC Western District of Louisiana , Judge: Cain, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv3375, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Sanctions, attorney Fees
J. Rosenthal finds for an insurance company on its claim against another insurer for the $1 million it paid to settle a car collision case, along with $169,000 in attorney fees and costs. The other insurer's policies completely cover the settlement at issue.
Court: USDC Eastern District of California, Judge: Rosenthal, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 1:18cv1319, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Insurance, Settlements, attorney Fees
J. Brownlee finds the trial court improperly granted a patient summary judgment on his claim under the Florida Consumer Collection Practice Act that a foot and ankle center put a lien on his workers’ compensation settlement. The center argues there was insufficient evidence when the contingency fee multiplier was imposed. The court finds the multiplier failed factorial analysis from the beginning, but the patient presented no evidence relevant to the first factor. Therefore, this case is remanded solely to enter judgement without the contingency fee multiplier. Affirmed, in part. Reversed, in part.
Court: Florida Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Brownlee, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 6D23-665, Categories: Settlements, attorney Fees, Contract
J. Crothers rejects a request to assign a case to another judge in a matter involving a divorce proceeding. Additionally, the order awarding attorney fees to the wife is reversed and the matter is remanded for explanation as to whether the district court intended to award attorney fees in its judgment, and if so, instruct the court to explain the legal and factual basis for an award. Reversed.
Court: North Dakota Supreme Court, Judge: Crothers, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 2024ND73, Categories: Family Law, attorney Fees
J. Eddins finds that proceedings initiated by a state agency are not sheltered by sovereign immunity, and grants attorney fees to groups defending a frivolous petition filed by the state them. The court deems frivolous the board’s petition, which claims that an environmental group winning a prior case that capped water diversions from a Maui river prevented water from being used to battle the Lahaina wildfires. “It seems that the BLNR tried to leverage the most horrific event in state history to advance its interests.” Despite many sources, including Maui county itself, establishing that water availability from the river had nothing to do with containing the fires, the board refused to withdraw its petition and forced the environmental group to participate in further proceedings. Sovereign immunity is waived when state agencies initiate original actions, therefore the board is subject to the environmental group’s attorney fees.
Court: Hawai'i Supreme Court, Judge: Eddins, Filed On: April 18, 2024, Case #: SCPW-23-471, Categories: Environment, Government, attorney Fees