1,959 results for 'court:"Texas Courts of Appeals"'.
J. Golemon finds the trial court properly revoked defendant's deferred adjudication community supervision. Convicted by guilty plea as a habitual offender for unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon, defendant was found to have violated the terms of his supervision and was sentenced to 45 years in prison. Counsel has found no arguable grounds for relief and defendant has filed no response. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Golemon , Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 09-23-00184-CR, Categories: Firearms, Probation, Sentencing
J. Johnson finds the trial court properly convicted defendant for misdemeanor theft, sentencing her to community supervision. Surveillance video from Academy sporting goods shows defendant taking two $300 Yeti coolers from the store without paying. The store director also identified defendant at trial. Furthermore, defendant fails to present an argument as to how she was prejudiced by trial counsel’s alleged deficiencies. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Johnson , Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 09-23-00281-CR, Categories: Evidence, Probation, Theft
J. Parker finds that the lower court properly entered an order modifying the parent-child relationship and appointed the father as "sole managing conservator with the exclusive right to determine the residence" of the children. Contrary to the mother's argument, the evidence sufficiently supports the lower court's best interest finding. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Parker, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 07-24-00002-CV, Categories: Evidence, Family Law
J. Alley declines to issue a petition for writ of mandamus vacating discovery-related orders in a divorce case. The relator ex-husband, who is a lawyer, argued discovery requests from his lawyer ex-wife could improperly require him to produce “attorney-client and work-product documents,” but the lower court has not yet ruled on privilege issues and, therefore there is “no clear abuse of discretion.”
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Alley, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 08-24-00026-CV, Categories: Civil Procedure, Family Law, Discovery
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Soto finds a lower court did not err in finding defendant guilty of assault with a deadly weapon. Defendant argued the court erred by allowing testimony on his previous domestic violence incidents, but those previous incidents were part of a pattern of violence and therefore relevant, as they “provided the jury with an explanation” for his actions “other than self-defense.” Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Soto, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 08-23-00232-CR, Categories: Evidence, Fair Trial, Assault
J. Soto finds a lower court did not err in finding defendant guilty of murder. Defendant argued the court erred by allowing testimony on his previous domestic violence incidents, but because defendant raised self-defense arguments — making his “motive and intent” in the shooting a “material issue in the case” — prosecutors were entitled to offer evidence of situations in which defendant “was the aggressor in the past.” Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Soto, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 08-23-00231-CR, Categories: Evidence, Fair Trial, Murder
J. Soto finds a lower court partially erred in granting summary judgment to a geotechnical engineer who was retained by a preservation group as part of a separate lawsuit over workmanship on a road. That preservation group than sued the engineer, arguing he had failed to adequately inspect the road as part of a settlement agreement. While the preservation group’s claims mostly fail because there are genuine questions over the engineer’s agreement to participate in the settlement agreement, the preservation group can still proceed with a negligence claim over “the professional engineering services that he did agree to provide.” Affirmed in part.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Soto, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 08-23-00205-CV, Categories: Settlements, Negligence, Experts
[Consolidated.] J. Christopher finds that the trial court should have granted the special appearance of the pharmaceutical holding company that was sued by two Texas counties for its role in the opioid crisis. The counties did not show the holding company is the alter ego of the drug maker over which the trial court has personal jurisdiction. Reversed in part.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Christopher, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 14-23-00202-CV, Categories: Negligence, Jurisdiction
Per curiam, the appellate court grants mandamus relief to the community association seeking to designate two entities as responsible third parties for an underlying suit brought by property owners over flooding allegedly caused by amenity lakes in the subdivision and improvements on nearby properties. It was an abuse of discretion for the trial court to deny the association's motion.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 14-23-00283-CV, Categories: Civil Procedure, Property
J. Smith finds that the trial court properly ruled against a doctor's motion to dismiss a negligence case filed against her by the mother of a child who committed suicide a day after being discharged from the doctor's care. On appeal, the doctor argues that she is entitled to dismissal of the case because the mother's expert report "lacks any evidence" to show that the care she provided was negligent and subsequently led to the suicide. The expert report provides a sufficient summary of the facts and establishes a line of causation from the doctor's care to the suicide. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Smith, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 03-22-00177-CV, Categories: Negligence, Experts, Medical Malpractice
J. Byrne finds that the trial court properly in part ruled in a case in which a court reporter and her firm sued the Judicial Brand Certification Commission for allowing another reporting firm to provide services without proper certification. The trial court correctly denied the commission’s plea to the jurisdiction for the reporter’s petition for mandamus relief. However, the trial court incorrectly denied the commission’s plea to the jurisdiction against the judicial review, because such a review is not an available option within this administrative context. Affirmed in part.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Byrne, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 03-22-00245-CV, Categories: Administrative Law, Government, Immunity
J. Smith finds that the lower court properly entered judgment in this negligence suit arising from a car accident. The appellant argues that he should have been awarded damages after the appellee was found by the jury "to be at fault for the accident." However, the jury's finding of zero damages was not "manifestly unjust." Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Smith, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 05-23-00390-CV, Categories: Tort, Damages, Negligence
J. Parker finds that the lower court improperly awarded title and possession of certain real property to the appellees. The evidence does not support the appellees' trespass to try title claim or their claim of "an oral gift of real estate." Accordingly, the matter is remanded for a new trial. Reversed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Parker, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 07-23-00284-CV, Categories: Evidence, Real Estate
J. Partida-Kipness conditionally grants the mother's petition for a writ of mandamus, in which she challenges certain orders in the underlying proceeding, granting the child's paternal grandfather "rights of possession and access." The rulings were an abuse of discretion, as the grandfather failed to establish standing to bring suit, due to his affidavit being deficient. Accordingly, the lower court lacked jurisdiction, and the grandfather's petition should be dismissed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Partida-Kipness, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 05-23-00812-CV, Categories: Civil Procedure, Family Law
J. Garcia finds that the lower court improperly granted declaratory relief to the appellee in this breach of contract lawsuit arising from a supplier subcontractor agreement. The evidence shows that a certain email termination was effective "under the substantial-compliance doctrine." The appellant does not establish, however, that the termination defeated the appellee's contract claims. Reversed in part.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Garcia, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 05-22-00752-CV, Categories: Evidence, Contract
J. Palafox finds a lower court did not err in revoking community supervision for defendant, imposed as part of two separate cases. Defendant argued there was not adequate evidence at his revocation hearing that he had taken a truck without permission, but the owner clarified defendant did not have permission in this case, and — although defendant was permitted to use the truck for work-related duties — in this case he admitted “he had taken the truck not for necessities but to purchase Xanax for himself.” Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Palafox, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 08-23-00018-CR, Categories: Evidence, Probation
J. Palafox finds a lower court did not err in revoking community supervision for defendant, imposed as part of two separate cases. Defendant argued there was not adequate evidence at his revocation hearing that he had taken a truck without permission, but the owner clarified defendant did not have permission in this case, and — although defendant was permitted to use the truck for work-related duties — in this case he admitted "he had taken the truck not for necessities but to purchase Xanax for himself." Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Palafox, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 08-23-00022-CR, Categories: Evidence, Probation
J. Soto finds a lower court erred in issuing a Qualified Domestic Relations Order after a divorce decree. The ex-wife is right that the court did not have jurisdiction to issue the order, but it was not part of the original divorce decree and was issued after the lower court’s jurisdiction over the case had already expired. Reversed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Soto, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 08-23-00311-CV, Categories: Family Law, Jurisdiction
J. Palafox grants mandamus relief after finding a lower court erred in a convoluted dispute that emerged from a personal injury case after it became clear at trial that an expert the injured man planned to call had a conflict of interest with a law firm representing the trucking company he was suing. The injured man is right that, because the trial date had been reset for a later date, discovery deadlines should have also been extended. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Palafox, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 08-23-00256-CV, Categories: Civil Procedure, Experts, Discovery
J. Bailey finds that the lower court properly denied the appellant's motion to recuse the judge based on an allegation of partiality in this eviction proceeding. The judge dismissed the appellant's counterclaim petition "the day after it was filed." It may have been improper to rule on the dismissal motion "without notice or hearing," but the ruling was "not a result of prejudice." Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Bailey, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 11-22-00127-CV, Categories: Civil Procedure, Real Estate
J. Tijerina finds that the lower court properly ruled in favor of the city in this breach of contract case arising from an agreement to perform certain road improvements. On appeal, the construction companies contend that the evidence is insufficient to establish their breach of the contract. But the evidence showed a "failure to adhere to the progress schedule." Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Tijerina, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 13-22-00416-CV, Categories: Evidence, Damages, Contract
J. Silva finds that the lower court properly terminated the parental rights of the mother to her two children. Contrary to the mother's arguments on appeal, the evidence sufficiently supports the statutory grounds for termination and the lower court's best interest finding. There was evidence of drug use by the mother while she was pregnant. There was also evidence that she failed to complete her service plan and testimony that the children's current foster placement is with a "loving home." Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Silva, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 13-23-00591-CV, Categories: Evidence, Family Law
J. Hassan finds that the trial court properly ruled against the majority shareholder of a corporation on third party claims against accounting firm parties stemming from a dispute with a partner in a hotel business. The shareholder failed to give evidence that the firm owed a fiduciary duty or that there was an alleged breach of any duty to him. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Hassan, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 14-22-00769-CV, Categories: Corporations, Fiduciary Duty
J. Poissant finds that the trial court improperly granted a plea to the jurisdiction in an actress' defamation suit against a university academic counselor after a disagreement between them and subsequent criminal trespass complaint against the actress. The counselor's claim of having "absolute privilege" will not be considered when determining subject matter jurisdiction in this case. Reversed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Poissant, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 14-22-00877-CV, Categories: Defamation, Jurisdiction