317 results for 'cat:"Fraud" AND cat:"Contract"'.
J. Dever grants in part a ticket booking firm’s motion to dismiss allegations of breach of contract and fraudulent inducement, among others, brought by the organizer of the Voices of America Country Music Festival. The organizer claims that the firm created over 5,000 duplicate tickets and over 1,800 duplicate parking passes, valued at over $1.4 million total. This is a clear breach of contract, but the firm presents sufficient evidence that its errors were unintentional, so all other claims are dismissed.
Court: USDC Eastern District of North Carolina, Judge: Dever, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: 5:23cv676, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: fraud, Trade, contract
J. Broderick finds for the equine hospital on breach of contract and fraud claims in a suit over the attempted purchase of a CT scanner for $995,000. While the hospital made down payments on the machine, the defendant manufacturer actually lacked the capacity to make the technology it purported to sell. The manufacturer clearly breached the contract by failing to timely deliver the machine, its only obligation under the agreement, and the hospital incurred damages of $546,000 in down payments it made on a machine that was never delivered.
Court: USDC Southern District of New York, Judge: Broderick, Filed On: April 9, 2024, Case #: 1:18cv6925, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: fraud, contract
J. Chasanow grants a communications company, consultant company, chief executive officer and chief financial officer’s partial motion to dismiss in this contract dispute brought by a former chief executive officer of the communications company. The former officer alleges that she was induced by the consultant company and its officers in order to enter a purchase agreement. She fails to allege false representations or state a claim for fraud.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Chasanow, Filed On: April 8, 2024, Case #: 8:23cv2749, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Communications, fraud, contract
J. Snyder denies in part a cannabis company's motion to dismiss an investor's claims of fraud and breach of contract after he requested the return of his investment and the company did not return the funds. The investor alleges that the company knowingly misrepresented the existence of the company, as well as its financial status, permits, and ability to conduct business in the state with required approvals. The investor has sufficiently alleged breach of contract, intentional misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, concealment and false promise claims.
Court: USDC Central District of California, Judge: Snyder, Filed On: April 8, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv3304, NOS: Other Fraud - Torts - Personal Property, Categories: fraud, contract
J. Melgren rules a precious metal buyer and class leader may pursue securities fraud claims against a precious metal dealer. The precious metal buyer sufficiently showed in court that the dealer convinced him to create an IRA account as part of a "low-risk method for growing wealth" for a Silver Lease Program, without disclosing that it was administered by a third party who pocketed his investment.
Court: USDC Kansas, Judge: Melgren, Filed On: April 8, 2024, Case #: 6:23cv1064, NOS: Securities/Commodities/Exchange - Other Suits, Categories: fraud, contract
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Willett finds the district court properly ruled in favor of the construction retaining wall manufacturer. The successor to the company that purchases and sells the walls says the manufacturer defrauded the original company by selling certain products to competitors. The successor seller brought its claims after limitations. Once the manufacturer allegedly breached the exclusivity agreement, the seller had an actionable claim. Any subsequent third-party sales would have only added to existing damages. The limitations period began to run upon the initial alleged breach. Affirmed.
Court: 5th Circuit, Judge: Willett, Filed On: April 3, 2024, Case #: 23-50123, Categories: fraud, contract
[Consolidated.] J. Conrad partially grants a medical supply company’s motion to compel following allegations of fraud it brought against two people affiliated with a wholesaler with whom the company did business. The company claims these two individuals stole at least $200 million from the wholesale business so that it could not pay the company for services rendered. The people’s accountant claims that the motion to compel was not served properly and that the subpoena was not valid. However, he fails to show sufficient evidence of these claims and, thus, must provide some of the paperwork requested.
Court: USDC Western District of North Carolina, Judge: Conrad, Filed On: April 2, 2024, Case #: 3:21cv501, NOS: Recovery of Overpayment & Enforcement of Judgment - Contract, Categories: fraud, Accounting Malpractice, contract
J. Boulware denies the subcontractor's motion for summary judgment. After issues with securing government funds for its work on Nellis Airforce Base, the contractor communicated with the electrical subcontractor regarding tracking of expenses. The subcontractor replied with altered invoices, eventually refusing to endorse a payment check for less than the claimed amount. Many disputes of material fact on fraud and contract claims and counterclaims remain.
Court: USDC Nevada, Judge: Boulware, Filed On: March 31, 2024, Case #: 2:21cv573, NOS: Miller Act - Contract, Categories: fraud, Government, contract
J. Whitehead declines to dismiss Amazon's complaint that the research institute refused to refund Amazon after it did not supply the company with the promised disposable medical gloves. Amazon sufficiently alleges that the research institute's employees and officers are its alter egos, that they knowingly made false promises about the disposable medical gloves, and that some misrepresentations happened before Amazon made the purchase.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Whitehead, Filed On: March 29, 2024, Case #: 2:21cv753, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: fraud, contract
J. Grimes finds the lower court properly dismissed a special motion to strike filed by a church deacon and his wife after a donor donated over $1 million to an organization run by the wife, after a sermon. The donation was to help purchase a car and a home for a destitute family, with any leftover funds to be returned to the donor. The donor discovered that the house and car were purchased in the organization’s name, not that of the family in need. The donor filed suit alleging he was solicited for the funds which were used fraudulently to benefit the organization, not the family he believed he was helping. The deacon and his wife deny the claim, alleging the conversations with the donor were public in nature and about the family’s needs, and protected as they were part of a sermon and protected speech. The lower court disagreed, as the discussions were specific in nature and the issue was not so much about where the speech or conversation occurred, but rather about the alleged misconduct perpetrated by the deacon and his wife after the sermon. Affirmed.
Court: California Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Grimes, Filed On: March 29, 2024, Case #: B327668, Categories: fraud, Fiduciary Duty, contract
J. Rothstein declines to dismiss the contract claim of the account holder's complaint alleging that the bank did not properly investigate a $140,000 fraudulent withdrawal. The claim survives because each time the bank allowed a fraudulent transfer was a distinct and separate error instead of a collective single error, and the deposit account agreement requires the bank to investigate any discrepancies a customer brings to its intention and to give the account holder a copy of reviewed investigative documents.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Rothstein, Filed On: March 29, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv5698, NOS: Consumer Credit - Other Suits, Categories: fraud, Consumer Law, contract
J. Scholer allows a petroleum vendor’s claims of constructive fraud to proceed in a case in which defendant continued to advance a client funds to purchase petroleum products despite defendant’s knowledge of the client’s inability to pay. The client filed for bankruptcy and the vendor now seeks payment for the petroleum product from defendant because Oklahoma’s Oil and Gas and Lien Act allows hydrocarbons to be sold with a lien on the proceeds from the sale of the product.
Court: USDC Northern District of Texas , Judge: Scholer, Filed On: March 29, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv525, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Energy, fraud, contract
J. Blakey partially grants a trucking company’s motion to dismiss fraud, contract breach and Carmack Amendment claims brought by a couple whose interstate move was botched by the company. The court finds the couple have not sufficiently alleged their fraudulent misrepresentation and Illinois consumer fraud claims, but allows their claims under the Carmack Amendment and federal motor carrier safety regulations to stand.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Blakey, Filed On: March 28, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv531, NOS: Recovery of Overpayment & Enforcement of Judgment - Contract, Categories: fraud, Transportation, contract
J. Underhill grants in part and denies in part a motion for summary judgment in a case in which Bondsmen did not return a depositor’s funds. The case is timely, and statute of limitations claims by Bondsmen do not apply. The depositor’s claim of fraudulent misrepresentation is denied because the Bondsmen’s representation of legal issuance of the bonds is an issue of fact. The depositor’s motion for summary judgment is denied in part and granted in part.
Court: USDC Connecticut, Judge: Underhill, Filed On: March 28, 2024, Case #: 3:21cv221, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: fraud, Conversion, contract
J. Wynn finds the lower court improperly granted summary judgment to the contractor on fraud claims. A couple and a contractor agreed to the sale and renovation of a home. The contractor told the couple that all subcontractors would be licensed before they signed the agreement. Despite Virginia law not requiring that subcontractors working under a licensed contractor hold their licenses, the couple would not have agreed to the sale if they knew they would be unlicensed. Vacated.
Court: 4th Circuit, Judge: Wynn, Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: 22-2265, Categories: Construction, fraud, contract
J. Coughenour denies the former insurance agency leader's motion to dismiss the fraudulent inducement claim in the insurance brokerage firm's complaint alleging that the former leader manipulated non-party Rice Insurance Agency's financial records to make it appear more profitable than it was, incentivizing the insurance brokerage firm to invest more than it should have. The insurance brokerage firm plausibly suggests that the former leader did not intend to honor his promises, as one pre-sale email has the former leader instruct an employee to delay recording commission checks so he could present an "earn out" of over 10 times until after the sale closed.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Coughenour, Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv1468, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: fraud, contract
J. Tunheim grants the video game maker's owner's motion for summary judgment in the game reseller's suit against him and his company alleging breach of contract and fraud. An email the owner forwarded with a delivery schedule, which proved to be false, is not sufficient to support a fraud claim.
Court: USDC Minnesota, Judge: Tunheim, Filed On: March 25, 2024, Case #: 0:19cv3114, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: fraud, contract
J. Failla partially grants the defendants' motion to dismiss investor claims that they misrepresented the value of their interests in a solar company in order to buy the investors' stake for $105 million, only to turn around and sell their collective interest for over $1 billion a year later. The parties' contract waives any right for investors to claim they were fraudulently induced into signing the sale agreement. However, the agreement does not bar claims against non-party affiliates, or non-fraud claims against the company.
Court: USDC Southern District of New York, Judge: Failla, Filed On: March 25, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv2172, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: fraud, contract
J. Bell affirms the lower court’s decision that a machinery producer has plausible evidence that a powder coat and finishing company committed fraud, among other things, when it created two similar companies and fraudulently transferred the producer’s money between them.
Court: USDC Western District of North Carolina, Judge: Bell, Filed On: March 21, 2024, Case #: 5:23cv59, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: fraud, Fiduciary Duty, contract
J. Simon declines to dismiss the fraud claim against one of the company owners from the investor's complaint, which alleges that the company owners induced the investor to put money into the cannabis business while overstating its profitability. The investor alleges sufficient facts showing that one of the company owners concealed facts about the other business that his co-owners operated that used the cannabis business' equipment without the investor's knowledge.
Court: USDC Oregon, Judge: Simon, Filed On: March 20, 2024, Case #: 3:21cv601, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: fraud, contract
J. Rufe grants a realty company's motion to dismiss this suit filed by a franchise company, alleging it breached the parties’ lease by failing to alert them that they were legally barred from opening a franchise store in the historic district of New Hope, Pennsylvania. The tenant failed to present any facts establishing that the landlord had a duty to alert them of local laws.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Judge: Rufe, Filed On: March 20, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv2193, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: fraud, Property, contract
J. Palafox finds a lower court partially erred in a complicated fraud case in which the suing company, which was working with several other companies to build a solar power facility in Nicaragua, accused its former partners of mislabeling and supplying lower quality solar panels than the parties had agreed to. The lower court was wrong to find that one company involved in the case still had a right to exercise a forum-selection clause in its contract, because the company had “consciously litigated” in Texas and only attempted to exert this option “after receiving an adverse ruling.” Otherwise, the court ruled correctly, including issuing a take-nothing judgement against another company after the suing company failed to address the individual elements of its fraud by nondisclosure claim. Reversed in part.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Palafox, Filed On: March 20, 2024, Case #: 08-22-00244-CV, Categories: fraud, contract
J. Seybert adopts in part a magistrate judge’s report and preserves for trial claims for fraud, rescission and declaratory relief stemming from a home equity sharing agreement. The court agrees with objections filed by two associated entities and dismisses claims for contract rescission against them, finding the claims were premised on fraud allegations that were dismissed.
Court: USDC Eastern District of New York, Judge: Seybert, Filed On: March 20, 2024, Case #: 2:21cv4542, NOS: Truth in Lending - Torts - Personal Property, Categories: fraud, Property, contract
Per curiam, the appellate division finds that the lower court improperly granted the capital firm's cross-motion for leave to file a third amended complaint to amend its allegations with respect to its fraud claim, but properly granted it with respect to the breach of sale agreement claim. The firm sufficiently alleged that the defendant company's obligation to transfer shares pursuant to the sale agreement was supported by valid consideration. Affirmed.
Court: New York Appellate Divisions, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: March 19, 2024, Case #: 01504, Categories: fraud, contract