511 results for 'court:"USDC Western District of Washington"'.
J. King finds in favor of the insurance company on the fraud claim in the insured's complaint alleging that the insurance company must provide more coverage for an accident caused by an underinsured motorist. The insureds' claims for bad faith, negligence, fraud, Insurance Fair Conduct Act and Consumer Protection Act are all time-barred.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: King, Filed On: May 13, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv873, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Fraud, Insurance, Negligence
J. Lin dismisses the patient's class action accusing the hospital of installing and implementing browser plugins on its website that allowed third-parties to access the patient's information, which became apparent when the patient saw numerous targeted advertisements on Facebook related to the treatments she sought through the hospital for her medical conditions. The patient does not allege if she provided her medical information through the hospital's private patient portal or its general website. Other courts have found that websites do not contain the same level of expected privacy as a patient portal.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Lin, Filed On: May 13, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv1159, NOS: Other Statutory Actions - Other Suits, Categories: Privacy, Class Action
J. King grants Brooks Sports' motion to join Lloyd IP as a necessary party to Puma SE's complaint alleging that Brooks Sports infringed on Puma's "NITRO" mark used for footwear. Brooks Sports sufficiently contends that Lloyd IP is the true owner of the mark and that Puma is just a licensee without rights to sue, and it is better to make that conclusion by including Lloyd IP in the lawsuit than by keeping it out of it.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: King, Filed On: May 13, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv116, NOS: Trademark - Property Rights, Categories: Trademark
J. Cartwright denies Citibank's motion to compel arbitration for the consumer's complaint alleging that the bank reported a debt to his account after he closed it. Neither the alleged re-opening of the consumer's account by unknown parties nor Citibank's failure to address it were reasonably foreseeable results of the consumer's contractual relationship with Citibank. The arbitration agreement for the closed account "cannot reasonably be construed to include future unknown accounts opened by third parties" without the consumer's permission. Furthermore, while the agreement covers "a previous related account," it does not reference that it covers future related accounts.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Cartwright, Filed On: May 13, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv5908, NOS: Consumer Credit - Other Suits, Categories: Arbitration, Debt Collection, Consumer Law
J. Rothstein remands the job applicant's class action alleging that the furniture company violated Washington law by not posting the wage scale or salary of its job opening. The job applicant does not plausibly allege a cause of action, because while a job posting that does not contain compensation information is a technical violation, it does not harm or create a material risk of harm. The applicant lacks Article III standing, so the court does not have subject matter jurisdiction.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Rothstein, Filed On: May 10, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv1742, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Employment, Jurisdiction, Class Action
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Rothstein finds in favor of the construction company against the commercial dump truck driver's complaint that the construction company issued him workplace safety citations that were actually a pre-text to fire him for reporting discriminatory conduct. There is no evidence on record that the construction company's legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons to fire the dump truck driver were pre-textual, as he received multiple written warnings about his unsafe conduct.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Rothstein, Filed On: May 10, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv815, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Employment, Employment Discrimination
J. Rothstein remands the job applicant's complaint that the temp agency violated Washington law by not disclosing the wage scale or salary range of its job openings. The job applicant does not plausibly allege a cause of action, because while a job posting that does not contain compensation information is a technical violation, it does not harm or create a material risk of harm. Therefore, the applicant lacks Article III standing and the court does not have subject matter jurisdiction.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Rothstein, Filed On: May 10, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv1680, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, Employment, Jurisdiction
J. Pechman finds that a jury must determine whether the protesters' First Amendment rights were violated when they were arrested and booked in jail for writing political messages in sidewalk chalk and charcoal on the city's temporarily erected walls outside of the Seattle Police Department's East Precinct. "While this case does not implicate the city's ability to enforce its property destruction ordinance more generally, it touches on questions impacting the public civil discourse and free speech in Seattle."
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Pechman, Filed On: May 10, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv17, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, Municipal Law, First Amendment
J. Rothstein remands the job applicant's complaint alleging that the equipment company did not include the wage scale, salary range or general description of benefits for its job openings in violation of Washington state law. A job posting that does not provide compensation information is a technical violation, which by itself does not create concrete injury. Because the applicant lacks Article III standing, the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction and the case must be remanded to superior court.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Rothstein, Filed On: May 10, 2024, Case #: 2:24cv175, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, Employment, Jurisdiction
J. Chun denies the university president's motion to dismiss the retaliation claim in the school faculty member's complaint alleging that the university president wrongfully fired the faculty member for putting a statement in his class syllabus, emails and outside his faculty office door about the Coast Salish tribe's claim to land that read, "I acknowledge that by the labor theory of property the Coast Salish people can claim historical ownership of almost none of the land currently occupied by the University of Washington." The school faculty member plausible states a First Amendment retaliation claim, because the school faculty member's speech concerned a matter of public concern, and the court cannot employ the applicable Pickering balancing test at this stage.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Chun, Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv964, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, Education, Employment Discrimination
J. Zilly partially stays the company's infringement claims relating to its '229 and '668 patents that were allegedly infringed on by the the video game company. The company sufficiently represents that the '229 patent "does not add appreciably to the case" if the inter partes review estoppel applies to the '525 patent, which is described as "a hand held controller for a game console." The company will show why its claims involving the '229 patent should not be dismissed with or without prejudice within 35 days of this order.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Zilly, Filed On: May 7, 2024, Case #: 2:17cv1182, NOS: Patent - Property Rights, Categories: Patent
J. Bryan denies the government's motion to dismiss the family member's complaint that the wife died after being exposed to asbestos fibers while doing laundry for her husband, who was an enlisted navy machinist mate and came into contact with asbestos at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard. The government argues that the discretionary function exception applies because it covers certain "governmental decision-making from judicial second guessing of legislative and administrative decisions," but it is uncertain if two of the navy's regulations related to asbestos were mandatory directives that required action and if the government failed to follow those directives.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Bryan, Filed On: May 7, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv5701, NOS: Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Government, Wrongful Death, Asbestos
J. King partially grants the city's motion to stay the family's complaint alleging that the city's employees killed the decedent by placing a spit mask on him after they choked him. The police officers plan to assert their Fifth Amendment rights for the potential federal charges against them, and their depositions are the only identified discovery that the family does not have, so a stay is appropriate. Unless the stay goes on beyond six months, the parties shall notify the court when the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Western District of Washington decides whether to pursue federal criminal charges against the police officers within 30 days of notification.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: King, Filed On: May 6, 2024, Case #: 3:21cv5692, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Wrongful Death, Discovery, Police Misconduct
J. Evanson grants the consumer's motion to amend his class action alleging that Amazon entered into an agreement with Apple to ban third-party Apple vendors from Amazon's marketplace, forcing the consumers to spend more on Apple's products. Despite their arguments to the contrary, Amazon and Apple do not show that the consumer's potential inadequacy as a class representative qualifies as an inherent defect, and there is no undue delay in amending the complaint.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Evanson, Filed On: May 6, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv1599, NOS: Antitrust - Other Suits, Categories: Antitrust, Class Action
J. Evanson denies summary judgment to the music photographer for his complaint that the music streaming service used his licensed photo of Jamaican musician Lincoln Barrington “Sugar” Minott without permission. Neither the music photographer nor the music streaming service are entitled to summary judgment because there are factual disputes as to whether the music streaming service's owner had the right to use the photograph by implied or expressed license.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Evanson, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv470, NOS: Copyrights - Property Rights, Categories: Copyright
J. Chun declines to dismiss the school faculty member's retaliation claim in his complaint alleging that the university president wrongfully fired the faculty member for putting a statement in his class syllabus, emails and outside his faculty office door about the Coast Salish tribe's claim to land that read, "I acknowledge that by the labor theory of property the Coast Salish people can claim historical ownership of almost none of the land currently occupied by the University of Washington." The school faculty member plausibly alleges a First Amendment retaliation claim as his speech “related to scholarship or teaching." While the university and its president cite the "Johnson v. Poway Unified School District" decision that allows discipline of speech on school grounds, that case's analysis focuses on secondary school education, not college education.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Chun, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv964, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Education, Employment Retaliation, First Amendment
J. Jones orders the insureds to respond to two of the insurance company's interrogatories for the insureds' complaint alleging that the insurance company must fully cover the insureds' underinsured motorist claim. One of the interrogatories is relevant to the case because it deals with employment history and the insureds claim that they lost substantial wages, while the other interrogatory deals with why the insureds think that the insurance company violated the Insurance Fair Conduct Act, and the insureds cannot delegate their duty to respond on their expert witness.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Jones, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv420, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Insurance, Experts, Discovery
J. Peterson declines to dismiss the former employee's complaint alleging that the healthcare company eliminated her position and knowingly fired her for using the grievance procedures of her union's collective bargaining agreement with the healthcare company. The healthcare company argues that dismissal is appropriate because a federal court must interpret the CBA, but the CBA is based on state law and thus does not require interpretation in this court. This action is remanded to the Clark County District Court.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Peterson, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: 3:24cv5138, NOS: Other Labor Litigation - Labor, Categories: Jurisdiction, Labor / Unions
J. King grants the gas company's motion to amend its complaint that the county denied the gas company's request for reconsideration even though the gas company expressed concerns about how the approved renewal permit would "have a material adverse impact on BEW, and, if implemented by the County, would effectively deprive BEW of the lawful use of its property.” The gas company may add its Section 1983 claim, which alleges that that the county violated due process by not giving the gas company notice of the application for a renewed industrial wastewater discharge permit, because the county does not show how the gas company's alleged failure to exhaust makes the claim futile.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: King, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv542, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Energy, Contract
J. Pechman denies the electronic financial services company's motion to dismiss the consumer's class action alleging that the company substantially assisted its user in sending the consumer unsolicited text messages inviting her to sign up for the company's Cash App services, in violation of the Washington Consumer Electronic Mail Act. The consumer sufficiently alleges that the company gave its user substantial assistance in sending the unsolicited texts because its "Refer a Friend" program process creates easy steps for its user to follow in order to send the referral message.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Pechman, Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv1969, NOS: Other Personal Injury - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Communications, Class Action
J. Rothstein dismisses the job applicant's class action alleging that the furniture company violated Washington law by not posting the wage scale or salary of its job opening. The job applicant fails to state his claim because while intangible injuries like the omission of statutorily required information can be concrete, the job applicant actually alleges a technical violation because the job posting's lack of information does not harm or create a material risk of harm to any single person's concrete interest.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Rothstein, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv1742, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, Employment, Class Action
J. Cartwright grants the hotel partial summary judgment for its claim that the insurance company wrongfully denied the hotel coverage for property damaged caused by water on the basis that the damage occurred before the policy date. Undisputed facts show that some damage happened after the police period began, such as the new instances of interior damage that began in heavily trafficked areas of the hotel, which is enough to trigger coverage.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Cartwright, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv1344, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Insurance, Contract
J. King awards each of the survivors $150,000 in liquidated damages for their complaint asserting that they should receive damages for the convicted having images depicting the sexual abuse of the survivors as children. The survivors are entitled to default judgment because they prove that they suffered damages from the existence and possession of these images, and the convicted's lack of participation in this litigation will prejudice the survivors if they do not receive default judgment.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: King, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv803, NOS: Other Personal Injury - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Damages
J. Lasnik dismisses a lawsuit in which the former chief of inventory management for King County Metro Transit accuses the county of not accommodating her religious exemption to the Covid-19 vaccine mandate, placing her on administrative leave and then firing her. The former chief did not give the county timely notice of a religious conflict, because she makes no attempt to explain how a Covid-19 vaccine injection qualifies as a defilement of God's temple while vaccine injections for other illnesses do not, and she acknowledges that neither injections nor vaccines are forbidden in her belief system.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Lasnik, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv823, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, Employment, Covid-19
J. Estudillo denies the high school student default judgment for his complaint accusing the school district of not taking enough action to stop a fellow student from saying homophobic slurs to the high school student, who is queer and gender fluid. The high school student does not adequately allege that the school district did not provide him services comparable to non-disabled students, because it is possible that the school district fails to stop all bullying regardless on the protected class status of the victim.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Estudillo, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv5717, NOS: Amer w/Disabilities - Other - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, Education
J. Lin grants Amazon default judgment for its complaint that the sellers sold counterfeit products bearing the grill manufacturing company's trademark. Amazon and the grill manufacturing company will face prejudice without default judgment, because the sellers did not appear or participate in this litigation despite being personally served. Also, the grill manufacturing company presents a sufficient trademark case, because it alleges that it owns the "Weber" trademark that the sellers used without authorization.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Lin, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 2:21cv1512, NOS: Trademark - Property Rights, Categories: Trademark