Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Connors finds that the lower court improperly convicted defendant on two of the sexual offenses but properly convicted him on the other. At issue is whether the evidence sufficiently established the age of the victim. The court concludes that the evidence proves the victim was under the age of 14 but not under the age of 12. Accordingly, the convictions on the Class A and B offenses are vacated, and the matter is remanded for resentencing as to the Class C offense of unlawful sexual contact. Vacated in part.
To read this case, start your 14-day free trial.
Request a free trial account to get access to more case data, documents, and features.
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.