Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreePer curiam, the appeals court finds the trial court improperly granted a motion to enforce a settlement agreement in a lawsuit over injuries a motorist sustained in a car collision. Because the insurance company of the driver who injured the motorist did not disclose an additional policy held by the driver's co-defendant before the motorist settled, an essential term of the motorist's offer to settle was violated, making the underlying settlement unenforceable. Reversed.
To read this case, start your 14-day free trial.
Request a free trial account to get access to more case data, documents, and features.
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.