Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Kobayashi dismisses a homeowner’s trespass and nuisance claims against Airbnb for allowing illegal rentals to proliferate in his neighborhood, but allows his false advertising claim to remain. The trespass and nuisance claims fail because the homeowner does not establish a link between Airbnb and the subcontractors he says are making noise that trespass on his property. However, Airbnb is not immune from the homeowner’s false advertising claims, despite their assertion that they only play host to rental owners, as the homeowner “challenges content created by Airbnb itself, not content created by a third party,” in reference to Airbnb’s promotion of itself. Its advertising promotes rentals on their site as legal, and Airbnb is not immune to claims made against its own content.