Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Holcomb denies the government's motion to dismiss a naturalized citizen's allegations of violation of the Fifth Amendment after he filed an I-130 petition on behalf of his stepson, which the government revoked, because the citizen did not establish “that the beneficiary legally changed his name." The court possesses subject matter jurisdiction. It is premature for the court to rule on whether the statute is unconstitutionally vague as applied to this action. The citizen has sufficiently stated an equal protection claim in asserting that Yemeni-Americans and their family members are subjected to a heightened evidentiary burden that is not applied to other citizens. The citizen has sufficiently stated a procedural due process claim by alleging that Immigration Services did not include his marriage certificate in the appeal sent to the Board of Immigration Appeals.