Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Messitte partially denies the marketing company and its owner and director, as well as the financial firm and its owner’s estate suing them, their motions in limine to exclude expert witness testimony in this fraud, conspiracy and defamation suit. The marketing firm’s proposed damages expert should be precluded from testifying regarding mitigation costs, which include legal fees, online reputation cost and childcare cost, but he may testify about lost profits to aid the jury in understanding the financial harm of defamation. The financial firm’s rebuttal expert will be permitted to testify on lost profits and a reduction in seminars held, and the owner’s text messages can be presented because the marketing company failed to identify any evidence to be excluded. The court grants the marketing company director’s motion in limine to forbid any use of or reference to his prior criminal history, as his convictions were 10 years ago and do not concern false statements.