Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Thompson finds that defendant should not have been convicted of illegal possession of a stolen firearm. In this case, the state did not show that the gun was stolen because the jury was not provided with the name of the person who owned the gun, the date/location when stolen, the name of the investigating officer, or the name of the officer who entered the gun as stolen. Further, there was no information on the report of the gun being stolen. Reversed in part.
To read this case, start your 14-day free trial.
Request a free trial account to get access to more case data, documents, and features.
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.