Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Underhill grants in part and denies in part a motion for summary judgment in a case in which Bondsmen did not return a depositor’s funds. The case is timely, and statute of limitations claims by Bondsmen do not apply. The depositor’s claim of fraudulent misrepresentation is denied because the Bondsmen’s representation of legal issuance of the bonds is an issue of fact. The depositor’s motion for summary judgment is denied in part and granted in part.
To read this case, start your 14-day free trial.
Request a free trial account to get access to more case data, documents, and features.
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.