Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Golemon finds the trial court properly denied the auto dealer's motion to compel arbitration. The buyer sued the dealer after she discovered that the truck she bought, advertised as new, was not new. The trial court properly found the dealer meant to manipulate the litigation process, prejudicing the buyer, by demanding arbitration after an unexcused 4-year delay, after a trial date had been set, and after the court granted the buyer's motion to compel discovery. Affirmed.
To read this case, start your 14-day free trial.
Request a free trial account to get access to more case data, documents, and features.
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.