Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Sacks determines it was an error to vacate a preliminary injunction that would require a former couple to share custody of Teddy Bear, their Pomeranian, in alternating two-week periods. This custody arrangement was in line with the couple’s agreements with each other and it was not an abuse of discretion to conclude that the man had a high likelihood of success on his contract claim against the woman if she continued to refuse him access to Teddy Bear. Reversed.
To read this case, start your 14-day free trial.
Request a free trial account to get access to more case data, documents, and features.
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.