Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Hambrick denies the insurance company's motion for a protective order regarding a "copy of the first Stop Gap coverage form issued to BTI with documents showing the date the form was first used to insure BTI and all variants of that form used thereafter," which relates to the insurance company's complaint that it has no duty to defend or indemnify the employees for when one of the employees suffered injury when unloading a trailer of molten sulfur. The information regarding the stop gap coverage issued to non-party BT Incorporated is relevant and potentially admissible because it can give insight on the parties' intent when they entered into the contract, and the insurance company does not show how allowing this evidence into this case would be unduly burdensome.