Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free[Consolidated.] J. Edwards finds that the lower court properly entered a modification judgment reducing the former husband's monthly alimony obligation. On appeal, the former husband contends that the alimony should have been terminated. However, the ruling was sufficiently supported by the evidence, as the former wife's testimony indicated a continuing need for alimony. Additionally, the former husband's mandamus petition is denied. Affirmed.
To read this case, start your 14-day free trial.
Request a free trial account to get access to more case data, documents, and features.
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.