Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Delaney finds the trial court properly denied the construction company's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict after the jury ruled in favor of the salon owner on its counterclaim for civil theft. Evidence in the record clearly established the construction company forged a receipt for one of the payments made by the salon, while the damages for the theft claim were also separate from those made in the contract counterclaim, which allowed both to be submitted to the jury. Affirmed.
To read this case, start your 14-day free trial.
Request a free trial account to get access to more case data, documents, and features.
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.