Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreePer curiam, the appellate division finds that the lower court properly denied the insurers' motion for summary judgment in a dispute over their refusal to provide coverage in two underlying personal injury actions. The insurers failed to show that a policy exclusion applies, due to inconsistent language in the contract, and it is not clear that the accidents at issue arose from the contractors' electrical work on the site or from general safety conditions. Affirmed.
To read this case, start your 14-day free trial.
Request a free trial account to get access to more case data, documents, and features.
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.