Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Greenholtz finds the lower court properly denied defendant’s petition for post-conviction relief. Defendant pleaded guilty to possession of heroin with intent to sell or deliver, with the length and manner of service to be determined by the court. Defendant received an 18-year sentence, and requested placement in a drug court program followed by community corrections, which the trial court considered; but when defendant was taken into custody, he was found to have heroin and opiates on his person and received new charges. Because of the new charges, defendant was no longer eligible for the drug court program and the trial court ordered him to serve his 18-year sentence. Defendant claims trial counsel was ineffective because he did not seek a competency evaluation due to mental illness, did not seek a continuance for his sentencing hearing, and alleges counsel knew he was not on his mental health medications and was using heroin at the time of the sentencing hearing. The post-conviction court found credibility in counsel’s testimony, and the instant court finds no deficiency in defendant’s representation. Affirmed.