Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Robinson finds that while the Danbury town clerk exceeded the scope of her authority when she determined only the second slate of Independent Party candidates for mayor in the November 2023 election should be placed on the ballot, the trial court's ultimate decision to place neither slate of candidates on the ballot was procedurally correct. The party did not functionally endorse a single set of candidates as required by state law. The first slate of candidates should have been approved by the clerk because an ad in the local newspaper satisfied statutory notice requirements, but the submission of a second set of certified candidates by the Independent Party effectively prevented it from endorsing a unified slate and required the trial court to remove both sets from the ballot. Affirmed.