Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Daniel alternately grants and denies multiple dismissal motions from multiple defendants in this sprawling racketeering, trade secret and contract case brought against them by Walgreens. The pharmacy chain accuses the defendants — store landlords, former employees and real estate investors — of conspiring to buy and sell Walgreens-leased properties while denying it its right of first refusal in real estate transactions involving Walgreens locations. The court agrees it lacks jurisdiction over several of the named investors and dismisses the claims against them, while denying the motion to dismiss from the main real estate firms involved in the suit. Against these defendants, the court finds Walgreens has sufficiently alleged the firms conspired to box its right of first refusal out of real estate transactions. The court issues a more complex order against a single investor, finding insufficient support for Walgreens RICO claims against him but allowing its Defend Trade Secrets Act violation claim to mover forward.