Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Sorenson finds that the trial court properly refused to bifurcate defendant's trial on a weapon charge from the determination of whether he was a restricted person since both issues were inextricably related. A mistrial was unnecessary after counsel impeached a witness's testimony. Counsel was not deficient for deciding not to object to an officer's claim that folding knives and a hatchet found in defendant's car were dangerous weapons. Affirmed.
To read this case, start your 14-day free trial.
Request a free trial account to get access to more case data, documents, and features.
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.