Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Smith finds the husband's due process rights were not violated by the trial court's denial of his motion to continue the hearing on a protective order. The hearing had already been delayed once and he failed to submit any interrogatories to the court by its deadline, which would have allowed for more discovery. Meanwhile, the trial court properly denied the husband's request for a polygraph test because the wife objected to the results of the test, which rendered them inadmissible under Ohio law. Affirmed.
To read this case, start your 14-day free trial.
Request a free trial account to get access to more case data, documents, and features.
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.