Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Soto finds a lower court ruled correctly in favor of a seller in a convoluted real estate dispute. The seller, who was ordered to pay back the buyer for a property sale after it became clear that she was not in fact the owner of the property in question, has already provided “legally and factually sufficient evidence” that both she and buyer held the “mistaken belief” that she owned the property, whereas the buyer has not provided adequate evidence of fraud. Affirmed.
To read this case, start your 14-day free trial.
Request a free trial account to get access to more case data, documents, and features.
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.