Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Tunheim denies the insurers' motion to stay proceedings pending its appeal of an injunction and underlying rulings that the insurers violated the Minnesota Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Proceeding with litigation on Minnesota Consumer Fraud Act claims will not modify the court's prior conclusions on violations of the No-Fault Act, which underlie its conclusions on the MDTPA and remaining claims under the Minnesota Consumer Fraud Act. Proceeding on remaining elements of the MCFA therefore will not impact an appellate court's ability to review the issues being appealed. A discretionary stay is also denied, since after four years of litigation "the case is getting old" and it is not in the Court's or the parties' interests to spend extra time on it unnecessarily.