Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Quattlebaum finds the lower court properly ordered the internet provider to pay rent for the utility duct. The internet provider rented the duct and could not come to terms with the railroad company over a lease renewal. They submitted the dispute to three appraisers, who decided the rent by a two-to-one vote in the railroad company's favor. The arbitration agreement requires the internet provider to pay the amount set by the appraiser, even if the vote wasn't unanimous. Affirmed.
To read this case, start your 14-day free trial.
Request a free trial account to get access to more case data, documents, and features.
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.