Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for FreeJ. Leung denies the declaratory judgment seeker's motions to strike portions of an expert report, expert disclosure, diligence documents and undisclosed testimony and partially grants its motion to compel production of notebooks kept by the patent holders' principal. The requested notebooks are relevant to the judgment seeker's claim that its product did not infringe the patent holders' patents, they need not be communications to be responsive, and it would not be unduly burdensome or untimely to produce them at this point, particularly since the judgment seeker first learned of them in the context of the principal's trial testimony. A motion to strike new infringement theories fails because no new infringement theory has actually been disclosed. A motion to strike a summary of anticipated expert testimony similarly fails because the summary does not alter the existing infringement theories. Finally, spreadsheets regarding the disputed software are demonstrative evidence and need not be excluded at this time.